Authors :
Kinkete Mfumabi Hervé; Belo Belaris Kevin; Longa Kapesa Emilie; Tshibangu Lutumba Israêl; Makengele Lukusa Gradi; Mabasa Ndontoni John; Mbiye Tshiama Sharonne
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 8 - August
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/56s3nax4
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26aug908
Note : A published paper may take 4-5
working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and
ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Mixed traffic in Kinshasa combines cars, motorcycles, and pedestrians on roads with limited fixed sensing and
intermittent connectivity. This paper presents KINBOT-AI as a design, implementation, and controlled-demonstration
artifact: a resource-constrained mobile Edge-AI platform that performs local perception, tracking, counting, queue
estimation, safety control, event logging, and human-supervised alert handling. The evaluation comprised 40 navigation
missions on a closed 85 m route, 25 counting sequences, 15 queue scenarios, 12 auxiliary environmental traces, 20 simulated
alerts, and eight forced 30 s network outages. The prototype completed 37/40 nominal missions (92.5%; 95% Wilson
interval: 80.1–97.4). Classwise F1 scores were 0.87 for vehicles, 0.82 for motorcycles, and 0.79 for pedestrians. Counting
errors recalculated from the reported manual and automatic totals were 8.6%, 14.1%, and 16.5%, respectively. Queuelength MAE was 1.7 units, average autonomy to 20% battery was 58 min, and median alert latency was 1.4 s. During all
eight outages, local obstacle avoidance continued and no logged event was lost or duplicated after reconnection. These
measurements characterize the prototype only within the controlled study environment and must not be interpreted as citywide operational performance.
Keywords :
Edge AI, Mobile Robot, Mixed Traffic, Object Detection, Human-in-the-Loop, Intermittent Connectivity, Kinshasa.
References :
- J. Zhang et al., “Data-driven intelligent transportation systems: A survey,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1624–1639, 2011, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2011.2158001.
- K. Nellore and G. P. Hancke, “A survey on urban traffic management system using wireless sensor networks,” Sensors, vol. 16, no. 2, 157, 2016, doi: 10.3390/s16020157.
- Japan International Cooperation Agency, Project for Urban Transport Master Plan in Kinshasa City: Final Report, 2019.
- S. Ayimpam, “La gouvernance au quotidien des taxi-motos à Kinshasa,” Géotransports, nos. 17–18, pp. 135–149, 2023.
- C. McFarlane et al., “First measurements of ambient PM2.5 in Kinshasa and Brazzaville using field-calibrated low-cost sensors,” Aerosol Air Qual. Res., vol. 21, 200619, 2021, doi: 10.4209/aaqr.200619.
- W. Shi et al., “Edge computing: Vision and challenges,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 637–646, 2016, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2016.2579198.
- M. Satyanarayanan, “The emergence of edge computing,” Computer, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 30–39, 2017, doi: 10.1109/MC.2017.9.
- S. Lee et al., “Edge AI-based smart intersection and its application for traffic signal coordination,” J. Adv. Transp., 2024, 8999086, doi: 10.1155/2024/8999086.
- J. Villa et al., “Intelligent infrastructure for traffic monitoring based on deep learning and edge computing,” J. Adv. Transp., 2024, 3679014, doi: 10.1155/2024/3679014.
- F. A. S. Gayas et al., “Edge-based traffic monitoring at intersections: Multi-class vehicle detection, tracking, and counting using YOLOv11 and BoT-SORT,” 2025, doi: 10.3233/ATDE251131.
- C.-H. Li and H.-S. Hou, “Enhancing synchronization of YOLO-based traffic detection on low-end devices by using the COID algorithm,” Proc. Eng. Technol. Innov., 2025, doi: 10.46604/peti.2025.15264.
- J. Redmon and A. Farhadi, “YOLOv3: An incremental improvement,” arXiv:1804.02767, 2018.
- G. Jocher, A. Chaurasia, and J. Qiu, Ultralytics YOLOv8, version 8.0.0, 2023.
- T.-Y. Lin et al., “Microsoft COCO: Common objects in context,” in ECCV, 2014, pp. 740–755.
- S. Thrun, W. Burgard, and D. Fox, Probabilistic Robotics. MIT Press, 2005.
- R. Siegwart, I. R. Nourbakhsh, and D. Scaramuzza, Introduction to Autonomous Mobile Robots, 2nd ed. MIT Press, 2011.
- [17] C. Pang et al., “Adaptive obstacle detection for mobile robots in urban environments,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 6, 1749, 2018, doi: 10.3390/s18061749.
- [18] A. Bewley et al., “Simple online and realtime tracking,” in ICIP, 2016, pp. 3464–3468, doi: 10.1109/ICIP.2016.7533003.
- [19] L. D. Brown, T. T. Cai, and A. DasGupta, “Interval estimation for a binomial proportion,” Stat. Sci., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 101–133, 2001.
Mixed traffic in Kinshasa combines cars, motorcycles, and pedestrians on roads with limited fixed sensing and
intermittent connectivity. This paper presents KINBOT-AI as a design, implementation, and controlled-demonstration
artifact: a resource-constrained mobile Edge-AI platform that performs local perception, tracking, counting, queue
estimation, safety control, event logging, and human-supervised alert handling. The evaluation comprised 40 navigation
missions on a closed 85 m route, 25 counting sequences, 15 queue scenarios, 12 auxiliary environmental traces, 20 simulated
alerts, and eight forced 30 s network outages. The prototype completed 37/40 nominal missions (92.5%; 95% Wilson
interval: 80.1–97.4). Classwise F1 scores were 0.87 for vehicles, 0.82 for motorcycles, and 0.79 for pedestrians. Counting
errors recalculated from the reported manual and automatic totals were 8.6%, 14.1%, and 16.5%, respectively. Queuelength MAE was 1.7 units, average autonomy to 20% battery was 58 min, and median alert latency was 1.4 s. During all
eight outages, local obstacle avoidance continued and no logged event was lost or duplicated after reconnection. These
measurements characterize the prototype only within the controlled study environment and must not be interpreted as citywide operational performance.
Keywords :
Edge AI, Mobile Robot, Mixed Traffic, Object Detection, Human-in-the-Loop, Intermittent Connectivity, Kinshasa.