Investigating Gender-Based Differential Item Functioning in Secondary School Economics Test Items Using Item Response Theory


Authors : Ossai Elizabeth Ngozika

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 2 - February


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/56du7du5

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2sdpwpee

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb192

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study investigated gender-based differential item functioning (DIF) in a 50-item Economics Multiple Choice Test (EMT) administered to 1,005 SS2 students from 46 co-educational secondary schools in Nsukka Education Zone. The study examined whether test items functioned equivalently for male and female students, identified items displaying DIF, and classified the DIF type. Results revealed that 47 out of 50 items functioned fairly for both genders, indicating that male and female students of equal ability had equal chances of answering correctly (No DIF). However, three items 12, 27, and 36 exhibited uniform DIF, favoring either males or females consistently across all ability levels. No non-uniform DIF was observed. These findings suggest that the EMT is largely gender-fair and reliable for assessing Economics achievement in SS2 students, with recommendations to review the few biased items to enhance fairness.

Keywords : Differential Item Functioning, Gender Fairness, Economics Assessment, Item Response Theory, SS2 Students.

References :

  1. Agi, C. I., Amakiri, H. A. E., & Ehi, A. B. (2024). Evaluation of item bias using differential item functioning (DIF) technique in NECO conducted Economics examination in Taraba State, Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(3), 1776–1790.
  2. Ali, A. (2006). Conducting research in education and the social sciences. Enugu: Tashiwa Networks Ltd.
  3. Danuwijaya, A. A., & Roebianto, A. (2023). Gender differences in secondary school assessment: A differential item functioning analysis using Rasch modeling. Journal of Psychological and Educational Research, 24(2), 45–60.
  4. Ikpoyi, E., Amakiri, H., & Ehi, A. (2024). Gender fairness in secondary school Economics examinations: DIF analysis of co-educational school items. Nigerian Journal of Educational Measurement, 10(1), 23–37.
  5. Nkeki, P., & Asekomhe, S. (2024). Gender and school-type differences in Economics multiple-choice items in WASSCE: Implications for item fairness. African Journal of Educational Assessment, 12(2), 55–69.
  6. Nworgu, B. G. (2015). Educational research, issues and methodology (3rded). Nsukka, Nigeria: University Trust Publishers.
  7. Ozdemir, B., & Alshamrani, A. H. (2020). Examining test fairness across gender using IRT-based differential item and test functioning methods. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 27–45.
  8. PPSMB (Post Primary School Management Board, Nsukka). (2013/2014). Senior secondary school population report for Nsukka Education Zone. Enugu State, Nigeria: PPSMB.
  9. Stella, T. (2021). Gender-based differential item functioning in secondary school science assessments. International Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 8(4), 112–124.
  10. Wahyuni, A. (2022). Detection of gender bias using differential item functioning (DIF) analysis in school examinations. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 13(1), 46–49.

This study investigated gender-based differential item functioning (DIF) in a 50-item Economics Multiple Choice Test (EMT) administered to 1,005 SS2 students from 46 co-educational secondary schools in Nsukka Education Zone. The study examined whether test items functioned equivalently for male and female students, identified items displaying DIF, and classified the DIF type. Results revealed that 47 out of 50 items functioned fairly for both genders, indicating that male and female students of equal ability had equal chances of answering correctly (No DIF). However, three items 12, 27, and 36 exhibited uniform DIF, favoring either males or females consistently across all ability levels. No non-uniform DIF was observed. These findings suggest that the EMT is largely gender-fair and reliable for assessing Economics achievement in SS2 students, with recommendations to review the few biased items to enhance fairness.

Keywords : Differential Item Functioning, Gender Fairness, Economics Assessment, Item Response Theory, SS2 Students.

Paper Submission Last Date
28 - February - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe