Integrating Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Evaluation of Breast Implant Satisfaction and Quality of Life


Authors : Busola Sulaimon

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/hcxbefhw

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2ym2d5z7

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN1948

PlumX Metrics

Semantic Scholar

ResearchGate

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : With a focus on aesthetic and reconstructive services, PROs have become even more important in assessing the success rate of procedures. More specifically, the current study looks into the use of PROs to gauge patient quality of life and satisfaction with breast implants. Accordingly, patients may not be content with their care because typical measures based on a proportion of fatalities, morbidity/mortality rates, or other consequences following treatment do not necessarily provide the complete picture. It is recognized that including PROs could assist healthcare practitioners with patient satisfaction insights that conventional measurements must precisely record. Among the frequently employed tools is the Breast-Q, which assesses many domains, such as satisfaction with the physical, psychological, and sexual aspects of the breast's appearance. Because of this, research has shown that incorporating these indicators is crucial for evaluating the perceived surgical outcomes, which show improved life quality and psychosocial elements and enhanced satisfaction with the appearance of the treated body area. However, physical discomfort and other adverse effects might sometimes be felt as tightness or pain that are difficult to quantify with traditional medical testing. When PROs are used in the clinic, a more thorough picture of the patient's functioning domains is provided, which enables the doctor to help the patient manage their post-operative pain or consult with a specialist about psychiatric issues. PROs can also strengthen the relationship between patients and clinicians by allowing patients to participate in creating their treatment plans, which guarantees that the plans are tailored to the patients' needs and preferences. Therefore, we must stress the significance of PROs, especially in assessing patient satisfaction with breast implants and their overall quality of life. Carotenemia SC identified areas of strength and need for improvement from the perspective of subjective constructs to enhance process quality improvement in breast implant surgery for the benefit of patients.

References :

  1. Adegoke, B. O., Odugbose, T., & Adeyemi, C. (2024). Harnessing big data for tailored health communication: A systematic review of impact and techniques. International Journal of Biology and Pharmacy Research, 3(2), 1-10. 

https://orionjournals.com/ijbpru/sites/default/files/IJBPRU-2024-0024.pdf

  1. Adelani, F. A., Okafor, E. S., Jacks, B. S., & Ajala, O. A. (2024). Theoretical insights into securing remote monitoring systems in water distribution networks: lessons learned from Africa-US projects. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 5(3), 995-1007. 

https://fepbl.com/index.php/estj/article/view/953

  1. Alam, S. (2023). PMTRS: A Personalized Multimodal Treatment Response System Framework for Personalized Healthcare. International Journal of Applied Health Care Analytics, 8(6), 18–28. 

https://norislab.com/index.php/IJAHA/article/view/77

  1. Cremona, M., Bister, D., Sheriff, M., & Abela, S. (2022). Quality-of-life improvement, psychosocial benefits, and patient satisfaction of patients undergoing orthognathic surgery: a summary of systematic reviews. European Journal of Orthodontics, 44(6), 603-613. 

https://academic.oup.com/ejo/article-abstract/44/6/603/6576749

  1. Davidson, K. W., Mangione, C. M., Barry, M. J., Nicholson, W. K., Cabana, M. D., Caughey, A. B., ... & US Preventive Services Task Force. (2022). Collaboration and shared decision-making between patients and clinicians in preventive health care decisions and US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations. Jama, 327(12), 1171-1176. 

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2790280

  1. Eriksen, J., Bygholm, A., & Bertelsen, P. (2020). The purpose of patient-reported outcome (PRO) post its digitalization and integration into clinical practice: An Interdisciplinary redefinition resembling PROs theoretical and practical evolvement. Applied Sciences, 10(21), 7507. 

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/21/7507 

  1. Fancourt, D., Finn, S., Warran, K., & Wiseman, T. (2022). Group singing in bereavement: effects on mental health, self-efficacy, self-esteem, and wellbeing. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 12(e4), e607-e615. 

https://spcare.bmj.com/content/12/e4/e607.abstract

  1. Funabashi, M., Wang, S., Lee, A. D., CK Duarte, F., Budgell, B., Stilwell, P., & Hogg-Johnson, S. (2022). Discomfort, pain, and stiffness: What do these terms mean to patients? A cross-sectional survey with lexical and qualitative analyses. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23(1), 283. 

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-022-05214-y

  1. Lam, M., Migonney, V., & Falentin-Daudre, C. (2021). Review of silicone surface modification techniques and coatings for antibacterial/antimicrobial applications to improve breast implant surfaces. Acta Biomaterialia, 121, 68-88.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1742706120306632

  1. Miseré, R. M., van Kuijk, S. M., Claassens, E. L., Heuts, E. M., Piatkowski, A. A., & van der Hulst, R. R. (2021). Breast-related and body-related quality of life following autologous breast reconstruction is superior to implant-based breast reconstruction long-term follow-up study. The Breast, 59, 176-182. 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977621004112

  1. Nguyen, H., Butow, P., Dhillon, H., & Sundaresan, P. (2021). A review of the barriers to using patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) and patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine cancer care. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 68(2), 186-195.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jmrs.421  

  1. Nowrozy, R., Ahmed, K., Kayes, A. S. M., Wang, H., & McIntosh, T. R. (2024). Privacy preservation of electronic health records in the modern era: A systematic survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(8), 1-37.

https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3653297  

  1. Ranieri, J., Fiasca, F., Guerra, F., Perilli, E., Mattei, A., & Di Giacomo, D. (2021). Examining the postoperative wellbeing of women who underwent mammoplasty: a cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 645102.

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.645102

With a focus on aesthetic and reconstructive services, PROs have become even more important in assessing the success rate of procedures. More specifically, the current study looks into the use of PROs to gauge patient quality of life and satisfaction with breast implants. Accordingly, patients may not be content with their care because typical measures based on a proportion of fatalities, morbidity/mortality rates, or other consequences following treatment do not necessarily provide the complete picture. It is recognized that including PROs could assist healthcare practitioners with patient satisfaction insights that conventional measurements must precisely record. Among the frequently employed tools is the Breast-Q, which assesses many domains, such as satisfaction with the physical, psychological, and sexual aspects of the breast's appearance. Because of this, research has shown that incorporating these indicators is crucial for evaluating the perceived surgical outcomes, which show improved life quality and psychosocial elements and enhanced satisfaction with the appearance of the treated body area. However, physical discomfort and other adverse effects might sometimes be felt as tightness or pain that are difficult to quantify with traditional medical testing. When PROs are used in the clinic, a more thorough picture of the patient's functioning domains is provided, which enables the doctor to help the patient manage their post-operative pain or consult with a specialist about psychiatric issues. PROs can also strengthen the relationship between patients and clinicians by allowing patients to participate in creating their treatment plans, which guarantees that the plans are tailored to the patients' needs and preferences. Therefore, we must stress the significance of PROs, especially in assessing patient satisfaction with breast implants and their overall quality of life. Carotenemia SC identified areas of strength and need for improvement from the perspective of subjective constructs to enhance process quality improvement in breast implant surgery for the benefit of patients.

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe