Authors : Idi Ochieng Juma Masoud; Dr. Jane Omwenga; Dr. Joseph Ndururi

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 5 - May

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/45eskbmm

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/4csctfxk

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY1817

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : In the evolving landscape of business, successful organizations of the future will be distinguished by their ability to cultivate exceptional skills in innovation, particularly in the realms of strategy development and organizational design. Innovation, whether manifested in product development, process enhancement, organizational methodologies, or marketing strategies, constitutes a multifaceted and intricate endeavor. It encompasses various dimensions across a singular firm, its clientele, and its network of suppliers (Tafti, Abdolvand, & Harandi, 2019). The study sought to examine the role of innovative structure on performance of SMEs in Kenya. The study applied Organizational Control Theory to investigate the role of innovation strategy implementation on the competitive performance of manufacturing SMEs in Nairobi City County, Kenya. The target population comprised 538 manufacturing SMEs located in Nairobi City County, chosen due to its cosmopolitan nature and concentration of manufacturing businesses. Top managers were selected as respondents because they primarily handle strategic management issues within organizations. Stratified sampling was employed to select the sample, with the population divided into sectors based on the classification provided by the Kenya Association of Manufacturers (KMA). The research adopted a positivism philosophy, aiming to gather empirical evidence to support its hypotheses. A cross-sectional survey design was utilized, combining qualitative and quantitative mixed methods. Data collection relied on a questionnaire, whose validity and reliability were confirmed through a pilot study. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25 software was used to analyze quantitative data, while qualitative data underwent thematic analysis and were presented in narrative form. The analysis included descriptive statistics to summarize quantitative findings, which were presented in tables and figures. The study employed a rigorous methodological approach to comprehensively investigate the relationship between innovation strategy implementation and the competitive performance of manufacturing SMEs in Nairobi City County, Kenya. The study also computed correlation and regression analysis to test the relationship between study variables and test the research hypothesis. The study concludes that Innovative structure has a positive and significant effect on the performance of SMEs in Kenya. The study revealed that centralization, integration, and decision-making influence the performance of SMEs in Kenya. This implies that improvement in innovative structure (centralization, integration, and decision- making) would improve the performance of SMEs in Kenya. This study recommends that the management of manufacturing SMEs in Kenya should formulate and implement effective strategies of investing in innovative strategies to increase the SMEs' competitiveness and improve their performance.

Keywords : Innovative Structure, Performance of SMEs in Kenya, Organizational Control Theory.

References :

1. Abdi, K., Mardani, A., Senin, A. A., Tupenaite, L., Naimaviciene, J., Kanapeckiene, L., & Kutut, V. (2018). The effect of knowledge management, organizational culture and organizational learning on innovation in automotive industry. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 19(1), 1-19.
2. Abowitz, D. A., & Toole, T. M. (2010). Mixed method research: Fundamental issues of design, validity, and reliability in construction research. Journal of construction engineering and management, 136(1), 108-116.
3. Abu Amuna, Y. M., Abu-Naser, S. S., Al Shobaki, M. J., & Abu Mostafa, Y. A. (2019). Fintech: creative innovation for entrepreneurs.
4. Aksoy, H. (2017). How do innovation culture, marketing innovation and product innovation affect the market performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Technology in Society, 51(4), 133-141.
5. Awamleh, F., & Ertugan, A. (2021). The relationship between information technology capabilities, organizational intelligence, and competitive advantage. Sage Open, 11(2), 21582440211015201.
6. Baierle, I. C., Benitez, G. B., Nara, E. O. B., Schaefer, J. L., & Sellitto, M. A. (2020). Influence of open innovation variables on the competitive edge of small and medium enterprises. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 179.
7. Bilan, Y., Hussain, H. I., Haseeb, M., & Kot, S. (2020). Sustainability and economic performance: Role of organizational learning and innovation. Engineering Economics, 31(1), 93-103.
8. Chege, S. M., Wang, D., & Suntu, S. L. (2020). Impact of information technology innovation on firm performance in Kenya. Information Technology for Development, 26(2), 316-345.
9. Chen, M.-H., Wang, H.-Y., & Wang, M.-C. (2018). Knowledge sharing, social capital, and financial performance: The perspectives of innovation strategy in technological clusters. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 16(1), 89-104.
10. Cui, T., Ye, H. J., Teo, H. H., & Li, J. (2015). Information technology and open innovation: A strategic alignment perspective. Information & management, 52(3), 348-358.
11. Damanpour, F., & Aravind, D. (2012). Organizational structure and innovation revisited: From organic to ambidextrous structure. In Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 483-513): Elsevier.
12. Damanpour, F., & Wischnevsky, J. D. (2006). Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23(4), 269-291.
13. Dedahanov, A. T., Rhee, C., & Yoon, J. (2017). Organizational structure and innovation performance: is employee innovative behavior a missing link? Career Development International.
14. Dogan, E. (2017). A strategic approach to innovation. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 4(3), 290-300.
15. Duhaylongsod, J. B., & De Giovanni, P. (2018). The impact of innovation strategies on the relationship between supplier integration and operational performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
16. Esemu, T., & Wood, E. (2014). Innovation and Value Creation in Emerging African Commercial Agriculture: Evidence from the Ugandan Flower Export Sector. In Quality Innovation: Knowledge, Theory, and Practices (pp. 497-521): IGI Global.
17. Etriya, E., Omta, O., Scholten, V., & Wubben, E. (2020). The importance of entrepreneurship and innovation for smallholder vegetable farmers in West Java, Indonesia.
18. Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine faculty use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) in higher education institutions. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 11(2).
19. Frey, B. S., Homberg, F., & Osterloh, M. (2013). Organizational control systems and pay-for-performance in the public service. Organization studies, 34(7), 949-972.
20. Ghauri, P., Grønhaug, K., & Strange, R. (2020). Research methods in business studies: Cambridge University Press.
21. Gitau, R. M. (2011). The relationship between financial innovation and financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya. University of Nairobi,
22. Ho, K. L. P., Nguyen, C. N., Adhikari, R., Miles, M. P., & Bonney, L. (2018). Exploring market orientation, innovation, and financial performance in agricultural value chains in emerging economies. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(3), 154-163.
23. Hvolkova, L., Klement, L., Klementova, V., & Kovalova, M. (2019). Barriers hindering innovations in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Competitiveness, 11(2), 51.
24. Kamau, J. G., Senaji, T. A., Eng, R., & Nzioki, S. C. (2019). Effect of information technology capability on competitive advantage of the Kenyan banking sector. International Journal of Technology and Systems, 4(1), 1-20.
25. Karlsson, C., & Tavassoli, S. (2016). Innovation strategies of firms: What strategies and why? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1483-1506.
26. Kim, J., & Choi, S. O. (2020). The intensity of organizational change and the perception of organizational innovativeness; with discussion on open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(3), 66.
27. Migdadi, M. M. (2019). Organizational learning capability, innovation and organizational performance. European Journal of Innovation Management.
28. Walker, R. M., Chen, J., & Aravind, D. (2015). Management innovation and firm performance: An integration of research findings. European Management Journal, 33(5), 407-422.
29. Wang, D. S. (2019). Association between technological innovation and firm performance in small and medium-sized enterprises: The moderating effect of environmental factors. International Journal of Innovation Science.
30. Waruwu, H., Asbari, M., Purwanto, A., Nugroho, Y. A., Fikri, M. A. A., Fauji, A., . . . Agistiawati, E. (2020). The role of transformational leadership, organizational learning and structure on innovation capacity: Evidence from Indonesia private schools. EduPsyCouns: Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 2(1), 378-397.