Authors : Estelly Chibbandula; Dr. Siatwiinda M.

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2jmzxnkf

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/ymrufy6j

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul1157

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Carbon credit initiatives have expanded rapidly across forest-dependent landscapes in Zambia, yet the extent to which host communities are meaningfully informed and involved in decision-making remains uncertain. This study examined the effect of information dissemination on community participation in decision-making in carbon credit projects in Sinda and Vubwi districts of Eastern Province, with information asymmetry and knowledge gaps treated as related conditions. A quantitative, cross-sectional survey design was adopted. The sample of ninety-one households was determined using Yamane's formula, and respondents were selected through a multistage procedure concluding with simple random sampling. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and analysed in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 26 through descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression. Most respondents were from Sinda (73.6 per cent) and the rest from Vubwi (26.4 per cent). Descriptive results revealed high perceived information asymmetry (mean 4.27 of five) and low information dissemination (mean 1.33 of four), and only about a quarter of respondents (25.3 per cent) reported involvement in decision-making. The regression model was significant and explained 30.5 per cent of the variance in community participation, with information dissemination the only significant predictor (standardised coefficient 0.726, p less than 0.001), while asymmetry and knowledge gaps were not significant. The findings indicate that the quality and frequency of deliberate information flows, rather than asymmetry alone, drive informed engagement. The study recommends transparent, locally appropriate communication, robust free, prior and informed consent and accountable benefit-sharing to deepen genuine participation in carbon credit governance.

Keywords : Carbon Credits, Information Asymmetry, Community Participation, Decision-Making, Information Dissemination, Forest-Dependent Communities, Climate Finance, Eastern Province, Zambia.

References :

1. Akerlof, G., 1970. The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), pp. 488-500.
2. Arnstein, S., 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), pp. 216-224.
3. BioCarbon Partners, 2023. Climate finance and community conservation in Zambia, Lusaka: BioCarbon Partners.
4. Brookings Institution, 2025. Improving carbon credit markets: transparency, quality and fungibility, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
5. Government of the Republic of Zambia, 2022. Eighth National Development Plan 2022-2026, Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
6. Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market, 2023. The Core Carbon Principles, London: Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market.
7. Interactive Country Fiches, 2021. Forest: Zambia, Geneva: United Nations Environment Programme.
8. International Institute for Environment and Development, 2021. Strengthening governance of community-based natural resource management in Zambia, London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
9. Milupi, I., Mubita, K., Monde, P. & Simooya, S., 2021. Community participation and community based natural resource management in Zambia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 5(9), pp. 421-430.
10. Milupi, I., Somers, M. & Ferguson, W., 2020. Inadequate community engagement and sustainable wildlife resource management in Zambia. African Journal of Ecology, 58(3), pp. 343-351.
11. Mulenga, B., Tembo, S. & Richardson, R., 2019. Electricity access and charcoal consumption among urban households in Zambia. Development Southern Africa, 36(5), pp. 585-599.
12. Öko-Institut, 2023. Assessing the transparency and integrity of benefit-sharing in voluntary carbon market projects, Freiburg: Öko-Institut.
13. Probst, B. et al., 2024. Systematic assessment of the achieved emission reductions of carbon crediting projects. Nature Communications, Volume 15, p. 9562.
14. Rocky Mountain Institute, 2023. Radical transparency for voluntary carbon markets, Boulder, CO: Rocky Mountain Institute.
15. Spence, M., 1973. Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), pp. 355-374.
16. The Nature Conservancy, 2023. Fairer carbon market frameworks for communities, Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy.
17. Voluntary Carbon Markets Integrity Initiative, 2023. Claims Code of Practice, London: Voluntary Carbon Markets Integrity Initiative.
18. West, T. et al., 2023. Action needed to make carbon offsets from forest conservation work for climate change mitigation. Science, 381(6660), pp. 873-877.
19. World Bank, 2024. Zambia and the World Bank sign agreement to cut carbon emissions in Eastern Province, Washington, DC: World Bank.
20. World Vision, 2021. Restoring Zambia's forests through community action, Lusaka: World Vision Zambia.