Authors : Sopiko Gvritishvili

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 3 - March

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mrmf7ft5

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/yksrdphp

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26mar1987

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This study investigates the effectiveness of an integrated metacognitive–pragmatic instructional approach in improving reading comprehension among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Although metacognitive strategy instruction and pragmatic awareness have been widely examined as separate components of EFL reading pedagogy, empirical evidence on their combined instructional impact remains limited, particularly in university contexts. To address this gap, the study employed a quasi-experimental mixed-methods design involving 60 undergraduate EFL students enrolled in a mandatory English course. Participants were assigned to an experimental group (n = 30), which received explicit instruction integrating metacognitive strategies (planning, monitoring, and evaluation) with pragmatic awareness (discourse markers, implicature, author stance, and contextual inference), and a control group (n = 30) that followed a conventional reading syllabus. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-reading comprehension tests, while qualitative data were obtained from reflective journals and classroom observations. Results indicated that the experimental group achieved significantly greater gains in reading comprehension than the control group (t(58) = 8.12, p < .001), with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 2.01). Qualitative findings revealed increased metacognitive regulation, greater sensitivity to discourse-level meaning, and more active interpretive reading behavior. These findings suggest that integrating metacognitive regulation with pragmatic awareness provides an effective framework for developing deeper reading comprehension in EFL contexts.

Keywords : Reading, Metacognitive Strategies, Pragmatics, Discourse Markers, EFL Learners.

References :

1. Anderson, N. J. (2012). Metacognition in teaching and learning English as a foreign language. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching (pp. 167–176). Cambridge University Press.
2. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353–394). Longman.
3. Carrell, P. L. (1983). Some issues in studying the role of schemata, or background knowledge, in second language comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 1(2), 81–92.
4. Chamberlain, M., & Kearns, D. (2021). Investigating the effectiveness of structured reading interventions for struggling readers: A mixed-methods approach. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(4), 721–742. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.401
5. Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14–26.
6. Cohen, A. D., & Weaver, S. J. (2006). Styles and strategies-based instruction. University of Minnesota.
7. Cruz, M. A. (2020). The role of reading fluency in literacy development among Filipino learners. Philippine Journal of Education, 93(2), 45–58.
8. Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2020). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. Teachers College Press.
9. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
10. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (2019). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 40(5), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519831383
11. Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
12. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell Publishing.
13. Nation, I. S. P. (2020). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
14. O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
15. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House.
16. Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J. (2020). Fluency: The bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 74(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1891
17. Rasinski, T. V. (2019). The fluent reader: Oral reading strategies for building word recognition, fluency, and comprehension (3rd ed.). Scholastic.
18. Rumelhart, D. E. (1994). Toward an interactive model of reading. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 864–894). International Reading Association.
19. Santos, M. C. (2021). Vocabulary knowledge, fluency, and comprehension among EFL learners: A mixed-methods analysis. Asian EFL Journal, 25(3), 132–157.
20. Stahl, S. A., & Nagy, W. E. (2019). Teaching word meanings. Routledge.
21. Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. Longman.
22. Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2021). Reading fluency and its intervention: Insights from developmental and neurocognitive perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(7), 1281–1297.