Authors : Anis Wulandari; M Maria Sudarwani; Sri Pare Eni

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4jtspxee

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/42y3j35s

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL165

Abstract : The flow of urbanization continues to show an increase, this is the result of rapid economic growth. Urban problems arise along with the natural rate of population growth, such as traffic jams caused by, among other things, an increase in the number of vehicles. The smart city concept has been developed and implemented in large cities such as Jakarta. Smart mobility and smart living are two of the six parts of the smart city concept, which have now been developed as a solution to solving urban problems, one of which is the improvement and development of public transportation infrastructure in order to improve the quality of efficient and effective services. The aim of this research is to know, understand and formulate critically and objectively the application of smart mobility and smart living, which are examined from the physical and non-physical characteristics of the commuter line transportation mode. This research uses a mixed method or combination approach. Research uses two approaches, namely qualitative and quantitative. Quantitative methods are used surveys and experiments, while qualitative methods themselves are naturalistic methods. The research results have four outcomes including; optimizing intramodal and intramodal accessibility for all users including people with disabilities, realizing sustainable public transportation, integration through technology to realize less cash, efficiency and access to information, as well as public transportation that pays attention to health, cleanliness, safety and security for its users.

Keywords : Smart City; Smart Mobility; Smart Living; Commuter Line; Sudirman Station.

References :

1. Ahmadjayadi, C., Subkhan, F., Wiradinata, M.R. (2016). Soaring or Running aground? New Indonesia from Smart City to Smart Nation. Jakarta: Kompas Gramedia
2. Pangaribuan, N., Winarni, I., Toha, M., Utami, S. (2017). Optimizing the Role of Science & Technology to Create a Smart City. Banten: Open University.
3. Atmojo, M. E., Fridayani, H.D. (2021). Smart City-Based Urban Governance Perspective of Innovation and City Development on the Island of Java. Yogyakarta: Blue Ocean.
4. Magdalena, D.E., Ardianta, D.A. (2017). Sudirman Station Circulation Arrangement with the Flow Concept. Pomits Journal of Science and Arts. 6(2):2337-3520.
5. Atmawidjaja, E.S., Sastra, Z., Akbar, N.R. (2015). Final Report on the Study of Smart City Development in Indonesia. Jakarta: Directorate General of Spatial Planning, Ministry of Public Works.
6. Montes Jose (2020). A Historical View of Smart Cities: Definitions, Features and Tipping Points. SSRN. 31 Page.
7. Eie Müller. D., Kosmidis. I. (2023). Sustainable mobility in smart cities: a document study of mobility initiatives of mid-sized Nordic smart cities. European Transport Research Review. 15:36.
8. Alonso. C.M., Aleta. N.B., Ruiz. R.MA. (2016). Smart Mobility in Smart Cities. Congreso de Ingeniería del Transporte València, Universitat Politècnica de València. XII.
9. Wawer. M., Grzesiuk. K., Jegorow. D. (2022). Smart Mobility in a Smart City in the Context of Generation Z Sustainability, Use of ICT, and Participation. MDPI Open access Journal. 15(13):4651.
10. Setyowati. K., Suryawati. R., Parwiyanto. H. (2020). Strategic Planning on Smart Mobility Development. majoring in social sciences. 19(2): 180-206.
11. Pratiwi. A., Soedwiwahjono, Hardiana. A. (2015). Surakarta City's Readiness Level for Smart Mobility Dimensions as Part of the Smart City Concept. Region Journal of Regional Development and Participatory Planning. 6(2):34.
12. Prawira. S.A., Pranitasari.D. (2020). The Influence of Accessibility, Innovation and Quality of Public Facilities Services on the Satisfaction of Disabled Passengers on the Jakarta Electric Railway. Repository of the Indonesian College of Economics. 1-15.
13. Al-Lami.A. (2023). Sustainability Indicators of Surface Public Transportation. MDPI Open Access Journal.15(21):15289.
14. Widiyastuti. I., Nupikso. D., Putra. A. A., Inanny. V. A. (2021). Smart Sustainable City Framework: Proposed Sustainable and Integrative Smart City Model. PIKOM Journal of Communication and Development Research. 22(1): 13-20.
15. Raynault. E., Christoper Ed. (2013). How does Transportation Affect Public Health?.US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. 76(6).
16. Mihaylova Nadya. (2021). How Transport Offers a Route to Better Health. Health Foundation Long. 1-22.
17. Hasibuan. M. H. M., Btubara. H., Lubis. M. ((2019). Study of Economical, Safe, Comfortable and Environmentally Friendly Transportation Equipment. UISU SEMNASTEK. 237-245.
18. Johnsen. S. O. (2018). Risk, Safety and Security in the Ecosystem of Smart Cities. IntechOpen. 205-221.
19.  Imre. S. Celebi. D. (2017). Measuring Comfort in Public Transport: A case study for Istanbul. Transportation Research Procedia. 25: 2441-2449.
20. GBC Indonesia. (2013). Greenship for New Buildings version 1.2. Green Building Council Indonesia. 1-17.
21. Munandar. Ns. A. (2022). Quantitative, Qualitative and Combination Research Methods. Bandung: Indonesian Science Media.
22. Abdullah Ma’ruf. (2015). Quantitative Research Methods. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.
23. Margaretha. A. M., Nugroho. A.A. (2023). Integrated Public Transportation: Optimizing the Implementation of Smart Mobility in DKI Jakarta. Journal of Public Policy and Applied Administration. 5(2):45-56.
24. Nam and Pardo. (2011). Conseptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, people and Institutuions. Proceedings of the 12^th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. 282-291.
25. Kaledi,S, Dewanti and Herwangi, Y. (2019). Smart Mobility Development Startegy Based on Public Transportation inYogyakarta City. Vol 14(1). 112-123.