Authors : Siti Thifal Permana Kusumah; Siti Jahroh; Widodo Ramadyanto

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 1 - January

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2rm25vzp

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/yetbp8bk

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jan924

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The marine insurance and reinsurance industry is characterized by high levels of uncertainty due to technical, operational, and environmental risks. In Indonesia, Marine Hull insurance plays a strategic role in supporting maritime transportation, yet it is also exposed to significant underwriting risks. Effective risk management in underwriting is therefore essential to ensure portfolio sustainability and underwriting performance. This study aims to analyze the implementation of risk management in Marine Hull Facultative underwriting at PT XYZ, measure the maturity level of risk management based on ISO 31000, and formulate improvement recommendations. This research employs a mixed method approach using questionnaires, Focus Group Discussions (FGD), interviews, and document analysis. The Risk Maturity Model (RMM) was applied to assess four attributes: risk management framework, risk culture, documentation, and underwriting systems. The findings indicate that the overall maturity level of underwriting risk management at PT XYZ is at the Preliminary Defined level. While risk awareness and underwriting documentation are relatively well established, weaknesses remain in system integration, audit follow up, and governance consistency. Strengthening system support, formalizing risk governance, and enhancing continuous improvement mechanisms are recommended to improve underwriting quality and reduce underwriting losses.

Keywords : Risk Management, Maturity, Underwriting Risk, Marine Hull, Reinsurance, ISO 31000.

References :

1. Adam FF. Marine hull product risk assessment at a reinsurance company. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Vocational Education Applied Science and Technology (ICVEAST 2023). Adv Soc Sci Educ Humanit Res. 2023; Vol. 783: 296–306. doi:10.2991/978-2-38476-132-6_28.
2. Afiyanti Y. Focus Group Discussion (Diskusi Kelompok Terfokus) sebagai Metode Pengumpulan Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia. 2008; 12(1): 58–62. https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v12i1.201
3. Arjang A, Ausat AMA, Prasetya YB. Optimalisasi sistem informasi dalam meningkatkan daya saing UMKM: Analisis sinergi inovasi digital dan fenomena FOMO dalam dinamika pasar. Jurnal Minfo Polgan. 2025; 14(1): 68–76. doi:10.33395/jmp.v14i1.14629
4. Berry-Stölzle TR, Fritzsch S, Scharner P, Weiß G. Insurers’ climate change risk management quality and natural disasters. Journal of Risk & Insurance. 2024; 91(2): 263–298. doi:10.1111/jori.12472
5. Fu’adi A, Andrian P, Sutopo YA. Asesmen tingkat maturitas sistem kerja hybrid di PT Elang Mahkota Teknologi, Tbk. Journal of Electrical, Electronic, Mechanical, Informatic and Social Applied Science (EEMISAS). 2024; 3(1): 22–28. doi:10.58991/eemisas.v3i1.52
6. Heckman L. The ALA Guide to Information Sources in Insurance, Risk Management, and Actuarial Science. Chicago: ALA Editions, an imprint of the American Library Association; 2016.
7. Hopkin P. Fundamentals of Risk Management: Understanding, Evaluating and Implementing Effective Risk Management. 4th ed. London: Kogan Page Ltd; 2010.
8. Jiang M, Liu Y, Lu J, Qu Z, Yang ZL. Risk assessment of maritime supply chains within the context of the Maritime Silk Road. Ocean and Coastal Management. 2023; 231: 106380. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106380
9. Junedah L. Pengaruh maturitas SPIP, kapabilitas APIP, serta implementasi e-planning dan e-budgeting terhadap kualitas sistem akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah (SAKIP) [Master’s thesis]. Universitas Lampung; 2019.
10. Kurniawan A, Wibowo A. Maturitas enterprise risk management kontraktor besar di Indonesia dan faktor-faktor yang memengaruhinya. Jurnal Teknik Sipil. 2017; 24(3): 257–268. doi:10.5614/jts.2017.24.3.9
11. LogicManager, Inc. RIMS Risk Maturity Model for Enterprise Risk Management (RMM) [Internet]. Boston, MA: LogicManager; 2006 Nov 28 [cited 2026 Jan 13]. Available from: https://www.logicmanager.com/resources/news/rims-launches-risk-maturity-model-for-enterprise-risk-management/
12. London School of Insurance. Marine Hull Insurance and Reinsurance [Internet]. London: London School of Insurance; 2019 [cited 2026 Jan 13]. Available from: https://elearning.londonschoolofinsurance.com/pdf/en/Marine-Hull_Ins_Reins.pdf
13. Marsauli V, Raharja S. Penerapan maturitas manajemen risiko, memahami level maturitas yang relatif rendah: studi kasus di PT XYZ. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting. 2023; 12(2): 1–10.
14. Molak V. Fundamentals of Risk Analysis and Risk Management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1997.
15. Ningrat MA, Suwanda D, Huseno T. Analisis maturitas dan kerangka governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) upaya peningkatan pendapatan asli daerah atas pengelolaan kekayaan yang dipisahkan di Provinsi DKI Jakarta: Studi kasus PT Bank DKI tahun 2018–2022. Jurnal Mahasiswa Ekonomi dan Bisnis. 2024; 4(2): 514–524.
16. Njatrijani R. Klaim marine hull and machinery dalam praktek pertanggungan. Diponegoro Private Law Review. 2018; 3(1): 326–344.
17. Nuryawati L, Ritonga IT. Analisis hubungan maturitas sistem pengendalian intern pemerintah (SPIP) dan kualitas pengelolaan keuangan (studi pada pemerintah daerah di Indonesia) [Master’s thesis]. Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2022.
18. Oko-Osi AH, Aroyehun DD. Underwriting practices and financial performance of insurance companies in Nigeria. Lagos Journal of Banking, Finance & Economic Issues. 2024; 5(1): 93–105.
19. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 1/POJK.05/2015 tentang Penerapan Manajemen Risiko bagi Lembaga Jasa Keuangan Non-Bank [Internet]. Jakarta: Otoritas Jasa Keuangan; 2015 [cited 2026 Jan 13].
20. Pratama RS, Rahmi M. Analisis manajemen risiko proses underwriting pada asuransi syariah: studi kasus PT Asuransi Jiwa Reliance Syariah. Islamic Economics and Business Review. 2023; 1(2): 155–168.
21. PT Maskapai Reasuransi Indonesia Tbk. Laporan keuangan [Internet]. 2026 [cited 2026 Jan 13]. Available from: https://marein-re.com/laporan-keuangan
22. Putratama MF, Basuki M. Manajemen risiko terhadap nilai klaim asuransi rangka kapal berdasarkan ITC Hull 1.10.83 Clause 280 (All Risks Comprehensive) pada kapal BG. TRG 06. Jupiter: Publikasi Ilmu Keteknikan Industri, Teknik Elektro dan Informatika. 2024; 2(5): 139–152. doi:10.61132/jupiter.v2i5.543
23. Ramadhani S, Ramadyanto W, Jahroh S. Risk assessment of the causes of cost overrun of project XYZ. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science. 2024; 3(11)
24. Ramidi SE, M.Si. Manajemen Risiko – Sesi 4: Metode Perhitungan Risiko [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2026 Jan 13]. Available from: https://belajaronline.cmed-indonesia.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Manajemen-Risiko-Sesi-4-Metode-Perhitungan-RIsiko-Ok.pdf
25. Renn O. Risk perception and risk management: A review. Risk Analysis. 2010; 30(4): 589–605.
26. Rofikah W, Septiarini DF. Implementation of underwriting risk management in PT Asuransi Jasindo Syariah. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori dan Terapan. 2020; 7(5): 901–910.
27. Safitri Z, Wendi E, Sitorus VP, Noviyanti I. Analisis SWOT terhadap pengembangan strategi bisnis pada Warung Makan Asyik Desa Balunijuk. Jurnal Manuhara: Pusat Penelitian Ilmu Manajemen dan Bisnis. 2024; 2(3): 140–153. doi:10.61132/manuhara.v2i3.967
28. Salim A. Dampak perubahan iklim terhadap transportasi laut. Riset Sains dan Teknologi Kelautan. 2023; 6(2): 170–173. doi:10.62012/sensistek.v6i2.31711
29. Sarjana S, Nardo R, Hartono R, Siregar ZH, Irmal, Sohilauw MI, Wahyuni S, Rasyid A, Djaha ZA, Badrianto Y. Manajemen Risiko. Bandung: CV. Media Sains Indonesia; 2022. p. 1–189.
30. Simanjuntak R, Priyarsono DS, Sumarti T. Analisis tingkat maturitas implementasi manajemen risiko di IPB University. Jurnal Manajemen dan Organisasi. 2021; 12(3): 177–188. doi:10.29244/jmo.v12i3.32779
31. Silmi. Analisis maturitas sistem pengendalian intern pemerintah terintegrasi peraturan BPKP nomor 5 tahun 2021. Journal of Applied Managerial Accounting. 2024; 8(1): 47–58.

32.  

32. Soekarto. Pengantar risiko dan tipe-tipe risiko. Indonesia; 2019.
33. Sudrajat RT. Analisis maturitas implementasi governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) di PT Kimia Farma Trading & Distribution [tesis]. Jakarta: Universitas Bakrie; 2025.
34. Suhartono R. Pengaruh maturitas Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (SPIP) dan kapabilitas Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (APIP) terhadap Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen dan Organisasi. 2021; 12(3): 177–188.
35. Suparto ERA, Lukmandono L. Penilaian maturity level ERM (Enterprise Risk Management) berbasis ISO 31000:2018. Prosiding SENIATI. 2022; 6(3): 478–482. doi:10.36040/seniati.v6i3.5079
36. Taleb NN. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House; 2007.
37. Vionna VV. Pengaruh penerapan manajemen risiko terhadap kinerja underwriting pada perusahaan asuransi umum. Jurnal Manajemen dan Organisasi. 2023; 14(2): 1–15.
38. Vorst CR, Priyarsono DS, Budiman A. Manajemen Risiko Berbasis SNI ISO 31000. Jakarta: Badan Standardisasi Nasional; 2024.