Authors : Kotharu Srinivasa Rao; Narisetty Laxmipriya; Velivela Gopinath

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 1 - January

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4vmt5r5t

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/msxeeet2

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jan353

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of reinforced concrete (RC) beams is critical for ensuring the safety and longevity of civil infrastructure. Conventional SHM approaches often rely on manual inspection or standalone machine learning and deep learning models, which are limited in capturing nonlinear damage characteristics and temporal degradation patterns under varying loading conditions. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a hybrid XGBoost– LSTM model that integrates gradient boosting–based feature learning with long short-term memory–based temporal sequence modeling for effective damage detection and severity assessment of RC beams. Initially, damage-sensitive features are extracted from sensor-based structural response data in both time and frequency domains. XGBoost is employed to perform nonlinear feature selection and preliminary damage estimation, enabling the identification of the most influential structural parameters. The selected feature sequences are then fed into an LSTM network to model the time-dependent evolution of structural damage. The proposed hybrid framework is evaluated using multiple performance metrics and compared against conventional machine learning and deep learning models, including support vector machines, random forest, standalone XGBoost, and LSTM. Experimental results demonstrate that the hybrid XGBoost–LSTM model achieves superior accuracy, robustness under noisy conditions, and improved damage severity prediction, with performance gains of up to 10–15% over baseline models. The findings confirm that the proposed approach provides a reliable and scalable solution for intelligent SHM of RC beams, supporting the development of data-driven, real-time infrastructure monitoring systems.

Keywords : Structural Health Monitoring; Reinforced Concrete Beams; Hybrid Learning; XGBoost; LSTM; Damage Detection; Artificial Intelligence.

References :

1. Farrar, C.R., Worden, K., “An introduction to structural health monitoring,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, vol. 365, no. 1851, pp. 303–315, 2007.
2. Sohn, H., Farrar, C.R., Hemez, F.M., et al., “A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996–2001,” Los Alamos National Laboratory Report, LA-13976-MS, 2004.
3. Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., Prime, M.B., Shevitz, D.W., “Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics,” Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1996.
4. Worden, K., Manson, G., “The application of machine learning to structural health monitoring,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, vol. 365, pp. 515–537, 2007.
5. Yao, R., Pakzad, S.N., “Autoregressive statistical pattern recognition algorithms for damage detection in civil structures,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 31, pp. 355–368, 2012.
6. Ni, Y.Q., Xia, Y., Liao, W.Y., Ko, J.M., “Technology innovation in developing the structural health monitoring system for Guangzhou New TV Tower,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 73–98, 2009.
7. Avci, O., Abdeljaber, O., Kiranyaz, S., Hussein, M., Inman, D.J., “A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: From traditional methods to machine learning and deep learning applications,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 147, 2021.
8. Sun, H., Büyüköztürk, O., “Identification of debonding in reinforced concrete beams using machine learning,” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, vol. 29, no. 3, 2015.
9. Gandomi, A.H., Alavi, A.H., “A new multi-gene genetic programming approach to nonlinear system modeling. Part II: Geotechnical and structural engineering applications,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 21, pp. 189–201, 2012.
10. Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., Guo, Y., “Damage detection of civil structures using random forest algorithm,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 25, no. 5, 2018.
11. Chen, T., Guestrin, C., “XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system,” Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 785–794, 2016.
12. Zhang, J., Li, H., Ma, Z., “Concrete compressive strength prediction using extreme gradient boosting,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 237, 2020.
13. Ahmad, M., Tang, X., Qiu, J., “Concrete strength prediction using machine learning techniques,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 228, 2019.
14. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J., “Long short-term memory,” Neural Computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780, 1997.
15. Abdeljaber, O., Avci, O., Kiranyaz, S., et al., “Real-time vibration-based structural damage detection using one-dimensional convolutional neural networks,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 388, pp. 154–170, 2017.
16. Yu, Y., Wu, X., Gu, X., “Structural damage detection based on LSTM neural networks,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 26, no. 5, 2019.
17. Lei, Y., Jia, F., Lin, J., Xing, S., Ding, S.X., “An intelligent fault diagnosis method using unsupervised feature learning towards mechanical big data,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 3137–3147, 2016.
18. Wang, Z., Sun, H., Büyüköztürk, O., “A hybrid CNN–LSTM model for structural damage detection,” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 765–785, 2020.
19. Zhang, L., Yang, Y., Wang, J., “Hybrid machine learning framework for damage identification of civil structures,” Engineering Structures, vol. 224, 2020.
20. Lundberg, S.M., Lee, S.I., “A unified approach to interpreting model predictions,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), pp. 4765–4774, 2017.