Authors : Mohammad Ebrahimi

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 2 - February

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3w2dvrs4

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mt9cdc9u

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14987736

Abstract : Human nature is highly complex and considered as an open non-equilibrium stochastic system. The complexity of biological systems related to the nature of cells, diverse components including, spatio-temporal interactions, constant modification, nonlinearity, networking, stochasticity, emergence, feedback loops, dependencies, competitions, degeneracy, phase coherence and chaos, entrainment and other aspects, which all are basis of the fundamental property of complex biological system. To understand such a complicated system like human organism, we need the systematic approaches. Scientists have attempted to better understand human physiology and pathology via both neurological homunculus and immunological Homunculus. It is supposed that biological processes are based on chemistry, and chemistry is based on quantum mechanics. Quantum biology is defined as the field of investigations applying quantum mechanics and chemical physics to biological issues. Quantum mechanics provides a description of the properties of subatomic particles, atoms, molecules, and molecular assemblies and their interaction with biofield. Many concepts such as chemical, acoustic, mechanical, electromagnetic, and molecular are suggested for cellular communications. Information transfer through signaling waves is considered the basic principle of communication between cells. The complex network of constitutively expressed repertoires wave-signals emitted from cells of different tissues, which have various parameters (frequency, amplitude, and coupling) and are different in norm and pathology, we named quantum Homunculus, or briefly Quantuculus. Here we came up with the idea that quantum immunculus continuously can detect in flexible mode coming electromagnetics signal from different part of body and through this evaluate cellular events, such as cell destruction/ proliferation rate, based on time varying and topology characterization.

Keywords : Neurological Homunculus., Immunological Homunculus., Quantum Homunculus., Cell Signaling., Bioresonance., Complexity.

References :

1. Ebrahimi M, Nesterova VI and Nesterov VI (2017) New Three-Dimensional NLS-bio-feedback Approaches in Site Specific Diagnosis of Cancer. Springer International Publishing AG, 2017, P. Mehdipour (ed.), Cancer Genetics and Psychotherapy.1071-1097.
2. Ebrahimi M, Nestrova V I (2024) Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Quantum-Entropy theory in Psychology and Medicine. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Psychological Research, 2024:1-10.
3. Weng G, Upinder SB and Iyengar R (1999) Complexity in Biological Signaling Systems. Science, 284: 92–96.
4. Poletaev A and Ebrahimi M (2018) Unsolved Mysteries: from Reductionism to Holistic Approaches in Medicine: Lessons from Immunculus. Adv Biomed Res Innov, 1:1-6.
5. Catani M (2017) A little man of some importance.  Brain, 40: 3055–3061.
6. Douglas NG, Bruce F (2009) Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration.  NeuroImage; 48:63-72.
7. Christelle G, Jean-Louis B (2003) C. elegans: of neurons and genes. Med Sci (Paris), 19: 725-734.
8. Schellekens W, Bakker C, Ramsey FN, Petridou N (2022) Moving in on human motor cortex. Characterizing the relationship between body parts with non-rigid population response fields. PLoS Comput Biol, 18: 1-13.
9. Treviño M, Torre-Valdovinos BD and Manjarrez E (2016) Noise Improves Visual Motion Discrimination via a Stochastic Resonance-Like Phenomenon. Front. Hum. Neurosci,10 (572): 1-13.
10. Boxte Jeroen JAV (2019) Modeling stochastic resonance in humans: The influence of lapse rate. Journal of Vision,19: 1–11.
11. McDonnell MD, Abbott D (2009) What Is Stochastic Resonance? Definitions, Misconceptions, Debates, and Its Relevance to Biology. PLoS Computational Biology,5:1-9.
12. Bassett DS, Bullmore ET (2009) Human brain networks in health and disease. Curr Opin Neurol, 2009:  340-347.
13. Aertsen A, Preißl H (1991) Dynamics of activity and connectivity in physiological neuronal networks. In: Schuster HG, editor. Nonlinear dynamics and neuronal networks. Weinheim, Germany. VCH Publishers: 281-302.
14. Mainzer K (2007) The emergence of mind and brain: an evolutionary, computational, and philosophical approach. Progress in Brain Research, 168: 115-132.
15. Cohen RI (2007) Biomarkers, self-antigens and the immunological homunculus. Journal of Autoimmunity, 29:246-249.
16. Elkon K and Casali P (2008) Nature and functions of autoantibodies. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol, 4. 491–498.
17. Poletaev A, Osipenko L (2003) General network of natural autoantibodies as immunological homunculus (Immunculus). Autoimmunity Reviews, 2: 264–271.
18. Scofield RH (2004) Autoantibodies as predictors of disease. Lancet, 363: 1544–1546.
19. Lacroix-Desmazes S, Kaveri VS, Mouthon L, Ayouba A, Malanchère E, Coutinho A, Kazatchkine MD (1998) Self-reactive antibodies natural-autoantibodies in healthy individuals. Journal of Immunological Methods,216: 117-137.
20. Ebrahimi M, Sharifov S, Salili M & Chernosova L (2015) An Introduction to Impact of Bio-Resonance Technology in Genetics and Epigenetics. Epigenetics Territory and Cancer, Springer. Edit. Parvin Mehdipour, 495–513.
21. Brian DE (2023) Force in Immunology: There Is Often a Catch. J Immunol, 211 (3): 307.
22. Wang M, Jiang H ,  Liu X,  Wang X (2022) Biophysics involved in the process of tumor immune escape. iScience,19(4):1-2.
23. Deng L, Langley RJ, Brown PH, Xu G, Teng L, Wang Q, et al (2007) Structural basis for the recognition of mutant self by a tumor-specific, MHC class II– restricted T cell receptor. Nat. Immunol, 8: 398–408.
24. Noppeney U, Friston KJ, Price CJ (2004) Degenerate neuronal systems sustaining cognitive functions. Journal of Anatomy, 205:433-442.
25. Edelman G, Gally J (2001) Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 98:13763-13768.
26. Jiménez A, Lu Y, Jambhekar A and Galit L (2022) Principles, mechanisms and functions of entrainment in biological oscillators. Interface Focus,12: 1-9.
27. Claim A, Ileri U, Uzuntarla M, Ozer M (2015) Vibrational resonance in feed-forward-loop neuronal network motifs. BMC Neuroscience, 16: 1-2.
28. Sanada H, Kunihashi Y, Gotoh H, Onomitsu K, Kohda M, Nitta J, Santos PV & Sogawa T (2013) Manipulation of mobile spin coherence using magnetic-field-free electron spin resonance. Nature Physics, 9:280–283.
29. Jelezko F, Gaebel T, Popa I, Gruber A & Wrachtrup J (2004) Observation of coherent oscillations in a single electron spin. Phys. Rev. Lett, 7: 1-4.
30. Kafatos CM, Chevalier G, Chopra D, Hubacher J, Kak S, Theise DN (2015) Biofield Science: Current Physics Perspectives. Global Adv Health Med, 4: 25-34.
31. Donald D (2005) Fitts. Principles of Quantum Mechanics: As Applied to Chemistry and Chemical Physics. January 2005, eBook. Chapter 1. 1-34. ISBN: 9780511037016.
32. Neese F, Atanasov M, Bistoni G, Maganas D and Ye S (2019) Chemistry and Quantum Mechanics in 2019: Give Us Insight and Numbers. J. Am. Chem. Soc, 141: 2814−2824.
33. [33]. Slocombe L, Sacchi M & Al-Khalili J (2022) An open quantum systems approach to proton tunnelling in DNA. Communications Physics, 109:1-9.
34. Bentleya PE, Freya BB and Deniza AA (2019) Physical chemistry of cellular liquid phase separation. Chemistry, 25: 5600–5610.
35. Bond E (2021) The Quantum Handshake: An Electric Charge/Transactional Interpretation of the Single Electron Double-Slit Experiment. Journal of Quantum Information Science, 11: 71-83.
36. Bonnemay L, Hoffmann C, Gueroui Z (2015) Remote control of signaling pathways using magnetic nanoparticles. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol,7:342–354.
37. Stanley SA, Sauer J, Kane RS, Dordick JS, Friedman JM (2015) Remote regulation of glucose homeostasis in mice using genetically encoded nanoparticles. Nat Med, 21: 92–98.
38. Mullins JM, Penafiel LM, Juutilainen J (1999) Dose–response of electromagnetic field-enhanced ornithine decarboxylase activity. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg, 48:193-199.
39. Cifra M, Fields JZ and Farhadi A (2010) Electromagnetic Cellular Interactions. Progress in Biophysics & Molecular Biology,105: 223-246.
40. Nesterov V (2011) Information in the structure of the universe. Adv Nat Sci, 4(2):1–6.
41. Nesterov VI (2012) Method of biolocation studies accuracy increasing. Curr Top Neurol Psychiatr Relat Discip, XX 3:11–15.
42. Nesterova VI, Yankina LA, Kojemyakin OR (2012) Application of three-dimensional NLS-diagnostics in oncology. New Trends Prospects Dev FCO, 3:19–21.
43. Canolty R, Ganguly K, Kennerley S, Cadieu C, Koepsell K, Wallis J.& Carmena J (2010) Oscillatory phase coupling coordinates anatomically dispersed functional cell assemblies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci; USA, 107:17356–17361.
44. Tort AB, Kramer MA, ThornC, Gibson DJ, Kubota Y, Graybiel AM & Kopell NJ (2008) Dynamic cross-frequency couplings of localfield potential oscillations in rat striatum and hippocampus during performance of a T-maze task. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA,105: 20517–20522.
45. Buzsáki G (2010) Neural syntax: cell assemblies, synapsembles and readers. Neuron, 68: 362–385.
46. Vogel V, Sheetz MP (2009) Cell fate regulation by coupling mechanical cycles to biochemical signaling pathways. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 21:38-46.
47. Cohn M (2008) An in-depth analysis of the concept of “polyspecificity” assumed to characterize TCR/BCR recognition. Immunol. Res, 40: 128–147.
48. Ayala Garcia MA, Yebra BG, Lopez F, Andrea L and Guerra EG (2012) The Major Histocompatibility Complex in Transplantation. J. Transplant, 842141:1-7.
49. Mould RR, Mackenzie AM, Kalampouka I, Nunn AVW, Thomas EL, Bell JD and Botchway SW (2024) Ultra weak photon emission—a brief review. Front. Physiol. 15:1-12.