Authors :
Timothy Terngu Bem; Yemi S. Onifade; E. O. Agbalagba; V. B. Olaseni
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 5 - May
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/sjsaasvn
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/decn5c2h
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26May1888
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
A two-dimensional (2D) electrical resistivity survey and radiometric assessment of soil lithology were conducted
in Forest Rayfield to investigate subsurface conditions, groundwater potential, and possible groundwater vulnerability
associated with geological formations and mining activities. The electrical resistivity survey was carried out along a single
profile using hybrid schlumberger-wenner array configuration. Apparent resistivity data gotten from the field were
iteratively converted using RES2DINV to produce 2D resistivity sections for subsurface interpretation. The interpreted
resistivity model identified Zone E1 extending from the surface to a depth of approximately 12 m, with resistivity values
ranging from 254 to 578 Ωm. Zone E1 therefore represents a transition zone between the weathered layer and fresh basement
granite that is suitable for groundwater flow and storage. The most suitable location for groundwater development was
identified at a lateral distance of 30–38 m along the profile and at depths greater than 40 m.
Keywords :
Radiometric Analysis; Groundwater Potential; ERT; Basement Complex; Contamination Assessment.
References :
- Agbalagba E. O.., & Onoja R. A.. (2011). Radiological assessment and hazard indices of naturally occurring radionuclides in soil materials.
- Agbalagba E. O.., et al. (2018). Geophysical survey of groundwater potential and radioactivity assessment of soil depth lithology for drinking water-quality determination.
- Agbalagba E. O.., et al. (2019). Geophysical survey of groundwater potential and radioactivity assessment of soil depth lithology for drinking water-quality determination.
- Arogunjo A. M.., et al. (2005). Gamma spectroscopy and environmental radioactivity assessment procedures.
- Ashraf M.., et al. (2010). Assessment of absorbed dose rate and radiological hazards from natural radionuclides.
- Avwiri G. O.., et al. (2012). Environmental radioactivity measurements and radiological hazard assessment.
- Avwiri G. O.., et al. (2014). Evaluation of annual gonadal dose equivalent from naturally occurring radionuclides.
- Banks D.., et al. (1997). Mine drainage and groundwater contamination studies.
- Dahlin T.., et al. (2002). Optimization of cell width in electrical resistivity tomography inversion models.
- Dey A.., & Morrison H. F.. (1979). Resistivity modelling for arbitrarily shaped two-dimensional structures.
- Diab H. M.., et al. (2008). Radium equivalent activity and radiological hazard assessment.
- Eruteya O. E.., et al. (2021). Application of electrical resistivity tomography in groundwater investigations.
- Freeze R. A.., & Cherry J. A.. (1979). Groundwater.
- IAEA. (2007). International basic safety standards for protection against ionizing radiation.
- ICRP. (2012). Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
- Jaiye O. O.. (2013). Environmental degradation associated with mining activities in the Jos Plateau.
- Jarup L.. (2003). Hazards of heavy metal contamination. British Medical Bulletin.
- Loke M. H.. (2003). RES2DINV manual and inversion techniques for electrical imaging surveys.
- Loke M. H.. (2011). Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies.
- Loke M. H.., et al. (2013). Recent developments in electrical resistivity imaging methods.
- Macdonald A. M.., et al. (2002). Groundwater development in basement complex terrains of Africa.
- Masok F. B.., et al. (2015). Radiological assessment of soils in Rayfield, Jos.
- Nevas M.., et al. (2002). Standard procedures for gamma spectrometric analysis.
- Neyamadpour A.., et al. (2010). Application of Wenner array in subsurface resistivity studies.
- OECD. (1979). Exposure to radiation from natural radioactivity in building materials.
- Okpoli C. C.. (2013). Electrical resistivity methods in groundwater exploration.
- Omosanya K. O.., et al. (2012). Robust inversion techniques in electrical resistivity tomography.
- Omosanya K. O.., et al. (2014). Electrical resistivity imaging for environmental applications.
- Onudibia I.., et al. (2023). Radiological risk assessment associated with mining environments.
- Passariello B.., et al. (2002). Environmental impacts of mining waste disposal.
- Ravisankar R.., et al. (2014). Annual effective dose equivalent estimation from natural radionuclides.
- Reynolds J. M.. (2011). An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics.
- Sousa A. J.., et al. (2008). Soil systems and contaminant migration studies.
- Taskin H.., et al. (2009). Radiological hazard indices and excess lifetime cancer risk assessment.
- Tordoff G. M.., et al. (2000). Mine waste and environmental contamination.
- UNSCEAR. (2000). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation.
- UNSCEAR. (2008). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation.
- Veiga R.., et al. (2006). Estimation of annual effective dose equivalent from terrestrial radiation.
- Zarie K. A.., & Al-Mugren K. S.. (2010). Soil radionuclide assessment in mining environments.
A two-dimensional (2D) electrical resistivity survey and radiometric assessment of soil lithology were conducted
in Forest Rayfield to investigate subsurface conditions, groundwater potential, and possible groundwater vulnerability
associated with geological formations and mining activities. The electrical resistivity survey was carried out along a single
profile using hybrid schlumberger-wenner array configuration. Apparent resistivity data gotten from the field were
iteratively converted using RES2DINV to produce 2D resistivity sections for subsurface interpretation. The interpreted
resistivity model identified Zone E1 extending from the surface to a depth of approximately 12 m, with resistivity values
ranging from 254 to 578 Ωm. Zone E1 therefore represents a transition zone between the weathered layer and fresh basement
granite that is suitable for groundwater flow and storage. The most suitable location for groundwater development was
identified at a lateral distance of 30–38 m along the profile and at depths greater than 40 m.
Keywords :
Radiometric Analysis; Groundwater Potential; ERT; Basement Complex; Contamination Assessment.