Authors :
Yuvraj Singh; Dhirender Pratap Singh; Naveen Chander; Yash Pratap Singh; Tanuj; Parth Singh
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 11 - November
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/ywkne873
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/2s3j63bz
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24NOV431
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
The use of generate AI in shapingt education
and skills’ acquisition has ensured that learners have a
personalized learning plan, curriculum and test
preparations and administra- tion. Through the help of
the current and improved AI models, educators can
design learning environments that enhance and increase
students’ interest and achievement in several subjects.[1]
Consequently, this paper will also explore how
generative AI can be used in practice for purposes like
writing and teaching, generating and providing real-time
feedback, and even recreatingscenarios for skills training
which are as close to the real life as possible. Though
useful, generative AI brings several concerns such as
data privacy and algorithmic bias into the limelight.
This work also focuses on the methods that need to be
followedin order to make ethical integration of AI while
introducing these technologies in education to provide
access to learning for all as well as prepare the students
and educators for the use of technology in their studies
and work.
Keywords :
Generative AI, Automated Content Creation, Interactive Tutoring, Real-Time Feedback, Educational Technology, Ethical Considerations, Data Privacy, Algorithmic Bias, Responsible AI Integration.
References :
- Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.
- Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shinn, N., & Wu, J. (2020). Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. arXiv:2005.14165.
- Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y. W. (2006). A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Computation, 18(7), 1527–1554.
- Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 27.
- Khan, F., Akram, R., & Hassan, A. (2020). Generative adversarial networks (GANs): A survey and research directions. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 17(6), 2570-2585.
- Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 26.
- Yang, Z., Chen, X., Salakhutdinov, R., & Cohen, W. W. (2017). Multi-task learning for word representation. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
- Xu, B., & Zhang, B. (2021). Transformers in Education: Applications of Generative AI in Modern Classrooms. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
- Baker, R. S. J. D., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In Learning Analytics (pp. 61–75). Springer.
- Heffernan, N. T., & Heffernan, C. L. (2014). The impact of intelligent tutoring systems on student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 425-450.
- Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.
- Baker, R. S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In Learning Analytics (pp. 61-75). Springer.
- Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile learning in education. Education and Information Technologies, 13(3), 235-251.
- VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-214.
- Rodr´ıguez, M., & Iglesias, C. A. (2020). Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Education: A review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(4), 2549-2565.
- Duan, Y., & Song, Y. (2020). Generative AI models in educational technology: Applications and future directions. Educational Technology Society, 23(4), 16-28.
- Zawacki-Richter, O., Baecker, E., & Deimann, M. (2019). Research on Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review of the Literature. Educational Technology Society, 22(4), 61-77.
- Herna´ndez, J., & Ortega, A. (2021). The role of generative AI in personalized learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-18.
The use of generate AI in shapingt education
and skills’ acquisition has ensured that learners have a
personalized learning plan, curriculum and test
preparations and administra- tion. Through the help of
the current and improved AI models, educators can
design learning environments that enhance and increase
students’ interest and achievement in several subjects.[1]
Consequently, this paper will also explore how
generative AI can be used in practice for purposes like
writing and teaching, generating and providing real-time
feedback, and even recreatingscenarios for skills training
which are as close to the real life as possible. Though
useful, generative AI brings several concerns such as
data privacy and algorithmic bias into the limelight.
This work also focuses on the methods that need to be
followedin order to make ethical integration of AI while
introducing these technologies in education to provide
access to learning for all as well as prepare the students
and educators for the use of technology in their studies
and work.
Keywords :
Generative AI, Automated Content Creation, Interactive Tutoring, Real-Time Feedback, Educational Technology, Ethical Considerations, Data Privacy, Algorithmic Bias, Responsible AI Integration.