Functionality of Google Maps and Parameter-based Efficient Eateries route Detection


Authors : Vedant Wagh; Ayush Vishwakarma

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 12 - December

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/adky8esb

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2twxpf4w

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14575910

Abstract : Google Map has been giving us the best results as promised since 2007 without ever failing. It also keeps upgrading the data and eventually integrated my location service. However, occasionally Google Map does not function as intended when displaying the quickest routes. It's because the geospatial data isn't updated frequently. It takes a certain amount of time to update the data. Here, we've spoken about how it occasionally malfunctions and how it provides us with a route that accurately forecasts the outcome. In order to tackle the challenge of identifying a destination using approximation parameters, we reviewed the Google Maps technique in this study and suggested a system. The issue is that if we want to locate a restaurant from source S that is decent and has average costs, the map should provide the path of the restaurant that is not the closest but effective by taking into account factors like the restaurant bill, distance, travel costs, service time, etc.

References :

  1. H. Li and L. Zhijian, "The study and implementation of mobile GPS navigation system based on Google Maps," 2010 International Conference on Computer and Information Application, Tianjin, China
  2. Z. Xiaofang, Z. Xu and Hejiang, "Research on satellite selection and search strategy of constellation autonomous navigation," 2022 34th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Hefei, China.
  3. S. Nanda, M. Ranjan Mishra, A. Narayan Brahma, S. Chandra Swain, S. Shekhar Patra and R. Kumar Barik, "Performance Analysis of Geospatial Serverless Computing for Geospatial Big Data Analysis," 2022 3rd International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems (ICESC), Coimbatore, India
  4. M. Ouyang et al., "Network Coding-Based Multipath Transmission for LEO Satellite Networks With Domain Cluster," in IEEE Internet of Things Journal
  5. G. Yuxuan, L. Yue and S. Penghui, "Research Status of Typical Satellite Communication Systems," 2021 19th International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN), Qufu, China
  6. P. Martin, E. Marchand, P. Houlier and I. Marchal, "Mapping and re-localization for mobile augmented reality," 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Paris, France
  7. H. Zhang, M. Li, Z. Chen, Z. Bao, Q. Huang and D. Cai, "Land use information release system based on Google Maps API and XML," 2010 18th International Conference on Geoinformatics, Beijing, China
  8. R. Ding et al., "5G Integrated Satellite Communication Systems: Architectures, Air Interface, and Standardization," 2020 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP), Nanjing, China
  9. T. Geller, "Imaging the World: The State of Online Mapping," in IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
  10. A.Dhoke and P. Shankar, "Exploring the Complexities of GPS Navigation: Addressing Challenges and Solutions in the Functionality of Google Maps," 2023 7th International Conference On Computing, Communication, Control And Automation (ICCUBEA), Pune, India.
  11. Y. Dian Harja and R. Sarno, "Determine the best option for nearest medical services using Google maps API, Haversine and TOPSIS algorithm," 2018 International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT), Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  12. O. Verenych, S. Bezshapkin, I. Vasyliev and D. Verenych, "GIS-Technologies Using for Spatial Data Analyse of the Road Traffic Accidences on the Example of Kyiv," 2019 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Trends in Information Theory (ATIT), Kyiv, Ukraine
  13. J. -R. Jiang, H. -W. Huang, J. -H. Liao and S. -Y. Chen, "Extending Dijkstra's shortest path algorithm for software defined networking," The 16th Asia-Pacific Network Operations and Management Symposium, Hsinchu, Taiwan
  14. T. Cieslewski, S. Lynen, M. Dymczyk, S. Magnenat and R. Siegwart, "Map API - scalable decentralized map building for robots," 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Seattle, WA, USA
  15. Bozyiğit, G. Alankuş and E. Nasiboğlu, "Public transport route planning: Modified dijkstra's algorithm," 2017 International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK), Antalya, Turkey
  16. K. Wei, Y. Gao, W. Zhang and S. Lin, "A Modified Dijkstra’s Algorithm for Solving the Problem of Finding the Maximum Load Path," 2019 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Information and Computer Technologies (ICICT), Kahului

Google Map has been giving us the best results as promised since 2007 without ever failing. It also keeps upgrading the data and eventually integrated my location service. However, occasionally Google Map does not function as intended when displaying the quickest routes. It's because the geospatial data isn't updated frequently. It takes a certain amount of time to update the data. Here, we've spoken about how it occasionally malfunctions and how it provides us with a route that accurately forecasts the outcome. In order to tackle the challenge of identifying a destination using approximation parameters, we reviewed the Google Maps technique in this study and suggested a system. The issue is that if we want to locate a restaurant from source S that is decent and has average costs, the map should provide the path of the restaurant that is not the closest but effective by taking into account factors like the restaurant bill, distance, travel costs, service time, etc.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe