Authors : Dr. Annie Abraham S.; Dr. Janet Glory M. C.

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 10 - October

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2a9hpszz

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26Oct1653

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The human capital theory of Becker essentially views investments in the knowledge, and skill sets of employees as productive assets that increase individual income, organizational productivity and growth. But a narrowly-focused notion of human capital may miss the subtleties of human development, employee autonomy, the quality of working life and individual possibilities in the workplace. The Capability Approach by Amartya Sen, moves the analytical focus away from resources and outcomes, and towards the substantive freedoms people have, to become the beings and to do the doings that they have reason to value. Human capabilities and skill levels also show high level of complementarity in modern production of goods and services, as suggested by Michael Kremer’s O-Ring model. This paper develops a unified theoretical framework that integrates these three seminal concepts, which can be practically administered in business and non-profit organizations. We define individual capabilities as the result of skill investments required by Becker transformed through organizational conversion factors such as psychological safety, agency, and autonomy — following Sen's conversion principle. We then introduce these capability levels into a Kremer-style production framework characterized by strong task complementarity. However, instead of following the multiplicative model of production function used by Kremer, we would use Transcendental Logarithmic Production Function. The proposed framework consists of four key phases, namely, human-capital investment, conversion mechanism, enhanced employee capabilities and realized organizational goals. The mathematical model and the set of conceptual propositions developed in this paper provides a research agenda for empirically examining the framework.

Keywords : Human Capital Investment, Capability Approach, Conversion Factors, Skill Complementarity, Conversion Mechanism, Organisational Goals, Translog Production Function.

References :

1. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education. National Bureau of Economic Research. Front matter, Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education
2. Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities, p. 13, Commodities and Capabilities : Amartya Sen : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
3. Kremer, M. (1993). The O-Ring Theory of Economic Development, Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (1993): 551–575. https://www.almendron.com/tribuna/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/kremer93.pdf
4. Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in Human Capital. American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17. 350kPEESchultzInvestmentHumanCapital.pdf
5. Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. National Bureau of Economic Research. c1765.pdf
6. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.
7. Wright, P. M., McMahan, G. C., & McWilliams, A. (1994). Human Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based Perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(2), 301–326. (PDF) Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based perspective
8. Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (1999). The Human Resource Architecture: Toward a Theory of Human Capital Allocation and Development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31–48. The Human Resource Architecture: Toward a Theory of Human Capital Allocation and Development | Academy of Management Review
9. Sen, A. (1997). Human Capital and Human Capability. World Development, 25(12), 1959–1961.
10. Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
11. Cameron, J., & Eyeson, A. (2012). Connecting Developments in Corporate Human Management Thinking to the Capability Approach as Used in International Development Research. Connecting Developments in Corporate Human Management Thinking to the Capability Approach as Used in International Development Research | Request PDF
12. Downs, Y., & Swailes, S. (2013). A Capability Approach to Organizational Talent Management. Human Resource Development International, 16(3), 267–281. A Capability Approach to Organizational Talent Management - University of Huddersfield Research Portal
13. Subramanian, D., Verd, J. M., Vero, J., & Zimmermann, B. (2013). Bringing Sen's Capability Approach to Work and Human Resource Practices. International Journal of Manpower, 34(4), 292–304. Bringing Sen’s capability approach to work and human resource practices | International Journal of Manpower | Emerald Publishing
14. Sigmoid Function – LearnDataSci
15. William H. Greene, 2020, “Econometric Analysis”, eighth edition, Pearson, New Delhi