Authors :
Dr. John Motsamai Modise
Volume/Issue :
Volume 8 - 2023, Issue 12 - December
Google Scholar :
http://tinyurl.com/28y74zcs
Scribd :
http://tinyurl.com/s8n2s4xn
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10654023
Abstract :
This article aims to initiate a discussion on the
idea of strengthening succession planning and enhancing
police leadership. It aims to show how the findings of
many researchers are interconnected. This article
examines the assessment process used today for the
promotion of mid-level officers to the executive level. It
looks in more detail at leadership training, including
how all officers can access and utilise it. The final section
makes the link between the desired leadership styles of
officers and how these desired styles could be enhanced
through appropriate assessment processes, leadership
development programmes and training for aspiring
police leaders.
The South African Police Service promotes people
to senior positions using traditional written
examinations. Written assessments are the most
economical. Recent research has shown that there are
problems with the validity of assessments. One such
problem is the attempt to predict a candidate's
behaviour or leadership qualities. Further research
highlights concerns about the lack of leadership
development in potential leaders. The process has
discouraged many from submitting applications for
internal promotions. This meta-analysis offers
recommendations to improve the promotion process for
police officers that can help with succession planning as
well as selecting the best candidate and improving
organisational leadership in general. Organisational
leadership can be heavily influenced by the police
promotion process, which can have both advantages and
disadvantages. Here is a summary of both sides:
A. Potential Benefits:
Increased competence and expertise: More qualified
and skilled officers may be appointed to leadership
roles through promotions granted on the basis of
merit. Better judgment, problem-solving, and
strategic planning may result from this.
Enhanced morale and motivation: officer morale and
motivation can be raised through an equitable and
transparent promotion procedure. Officers may be
inspired to perform well and aim for leadership
positions by understanding that promotions are
determined on merit and performance.
Stronger pipeline for leadership: Talent that shows
promise for future leadership roles can be found and
developed through a well-thought-out promotion
procedure. This can guarantee that the firm will
always have a consistent supply of talented and
qualified leaders.
Greater diversity and inclusivity: A more inclusive
and varied leadership team may result from a
promotion process that values merit above all else
and does away with prejudice. This can promote
more interactions with the general public, increase
cultural awareness, and improve understanding of
the community.
B. Challenges to consider:
Potential for unfairness and bias: Unconscious bias
or partiality can exist in even the best-intentioned
promotional procedures. To reduce these risks, it is
essential to put in place transparent processes,
objective standards, and oversight systems.
Temporary instability and disruption: Elevating
officers to leadership roles may result in vacancies
that need to be filled as well as modifications to
current structures and teams. To reduce disturbance,
transition management and effective planning are
crucial.
Opposition to change: Some current leaders can be
against the adjustments that new leadership brings
about. For transitions to go smoothly, cooperation,
support, and effective communication are required.
Opposition to change: Some current leaders can
object to the adjustments made by the new
administration. To ensure seamless transitions,
effective teamwork, communication, and support are
required.
C. Additional considerations:
Training and development: By funding leadership
training and development initiatives, newly promoted
officers can be given the tools they need to be
successful in their new positions.
Mentorship and support: By offering new leaders
mentorship and support programs, we can assist
them learn from seasoned leaders and successfully
manage the obstacles of their new roles.
Performance evaluation and accountability: You can
make sure that the promotion process improves
organizational effectiveness by defining clear
performance objectives and holding leaders
responsible for their actions.All things considered, improving organizational
leadership can be accomplished with the help of the
police promotion procedure. Through the
implementation of best practices and resolution of
potential obstacles, law enforcement agencies can
optimize the advantages of promotion and establish a robust and efficient leadership cohort.
This article aims to initiate a discussion on the
idea of strengthening succession planning and enhancing
police leadership. It aims to show how the findings of
many researchers are interconnected. This article
examines the assessment process used today for the
promotion of mid-level officers to the executive level. It
looks in more detail at leadership training, including
how all officers can access and utilise it. The final section
makes the link between the desired leadership styles of
officers and how these desired styles could be enhanced
through appropriate assessment processes, leadership
development programmes and training for aspiring
police leaders.
The South African Police Service promotes people
to senior positions using traditional written
examinations. Written assessments are the most
economical. Recent research has shown that there are
problems with the validity of assessments. One such
problem is the attempt to predict a candidate's
behaviour or leadership qualities. Further research
highlights concerns about the lack of leadership
development in potential leaders. The process has
discouraged many from submitting applications for
internal promotions. This meta-analysis offers
recommendations to improve the promotion process for
police officers that can help with succession planning as
well as selecting the best candidate and improving
organisational leadership in general. Organisational
leadership can be heavily influenced by the police
promotion process, which can have both advantages and
disadvantages. Here is a summary of both sides:
A. Potential Benefits:
Increased competence and expertise: More qualified
and skilled officers may be appointed to leadership
roles through promotions granted on the basis of
merit. Better judgment, problem-solving, and
strategic planning may result from this.
Enhanced morale and motivation: officer morale and
motivation can be raised through an equitable and
transparent promotion procedure. Officers may be
inspired to perform well and aim for leadership
positions by understanding that promotions are
determined on merit and performance.
Stronger pipeline for leadership: Talent that shows
promise for future leadership roles can be found and
developed through a well-thought-out promotion
procedure. This can guarantee that the firm will
always have a consistent supply of talented and
qualified leaders.
Greater diversity and inclusivity: A more inclusive
and varied leadership team may result from a
promotion process that values merit above all else
and does away with prejudice. This can promote
more interactions with the general public, increase
cultural awareness, and improve understanding of
the community.
B. Challenges to consider:
Potential for unfairness and bias: Unconscious bias
or partiality can exist in even the best-intentioned
promotional procedures. To reduce these risks, it is
essential to put in place transparent processes,
objective standards, and oversight systems.
Temporary instability and disruption: Elevating
officers to leadership roles may result in vacancies
that need to be filled as well as modifications to
current structures and teams. To reduce disturbance,
transition management and effective planning are
crucial.
Opposition to change: Some current leaders can be
against the adjustments that new leadership brings
about. For transitions to go smoothly, cooperation,
support, and effective communication are required.
Opposition to change: Some current leaders can
object to the adjustments made by the new
administration. To ensure seamless transitions,
effective teamwork, communication, and support are
required.
C. Additional considerations:
Training and development: By funding leadership
training and development initiatives, newly promoted
officers can be given the tools they need to be
successful in their new positions.
Mentorship and support: By offering new leaders
mentorship and support programs, we can assist
them learn from seasoned leaders and successfully
manage the obstacles of their new roles.
Performance evaluation and accountability: You can
make sure that the promotion process improves
organizational effectiveness by defining clear
performance objectives and holding leaders
responsible for their actions.All things considered, improving organizational
leadership can be accomplished with the help of the
police promotion procedure. Through the
implementation of best practices and resolution of
potential obstacles, law enforcement agencies can
optimize the advantages of promotion and establish a robust and efficient leadership cohort.