Food Brigade Strategy to Increase Paddy Production in Aceh Province


Authors : Akram Hamidi; Zakiah; Suyanti Kasimin

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 1 - January


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mtc6nae6

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/5pk3b623

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jan535

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : The agricultural sector in Simeulue Regency faces challenges including low productivity, limited infrastructure, and high dependence on external funding. The Food Brigade Program (Program Brigade Pangan) was established as a strategic initiative to enhance production efficiency through the collective management of land areas of at least 200 hectares, supported by adaptive agricultural technology. This study aims to identify internal and external factors influencing rice production enhancement and to formulate development strategies for the Food Brigade Program in Simeulue Regency. The research method employed is a descriptive-quantitative survey using purposive sampling of seven Food Brigade groups, involving a total of 105 respondents. Data analysis was conducted by identifying internal and external environmental factors, evaluated using the Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) and External Factor Evaluation (EFE) matrices, followed by strategy formulation through SWOT analysis. The results indicate that the program's primary strengths lie in the availability of extensive land, adequate water resources (pump irrigation), and high community interest in agricultural innovation. However, the program is constrained by unsustainable monitoring systems and low technology literacy among traditional farmers. The recommended strategy is an aggressive strategy (growth- oriented strategy) utilizing the Strengths-Opportunities (S-O) approach. The implementation of this strategy includes the Land Optimization Program (OPLA) to increase the Cropping Index (IP) from 2 to 2.5, and institutional strengthening through Farmer Field Schools (Sekolah Lapang) and partnerships with post-harvest processing industries. Additionally, diversification of water-saving irrigation systems ("Solar Drip Reservoir System") is required to mitigate climate change impacts, alongside the revitalization of local wisdom such as Kono Lada through Qanun regulations to protect sustainable agricultural land. The integration of technological modernization, cooperative financial independence, and strengthened digital coordination is expected to ensure food sovereignty and farmer welfare in Simeulue Regency.

Keywords : Food Brigade; Rice Production; SWOT Analysis; Simeulue; Farmer Institutions.

References :

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), (2021). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2021. Rome.
  2. Kementerian Pertanian RI. (2022). Rencana Strategis Kementerian Pertanian Tahun 2020-2024 (Revisi). Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Pertanian.
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), (2023). Statistik Produksi Padi Nasional 2023. Jakarta.
  4. World Bank, (2019). Future of Food: Harnessing Digital Technologies to Improve Food System Outcomes. Washington, DC.
  5. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). (2022). Crisis Response Initiative: Protecting future harvests. Rome: IFAD.
  6. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Aceh, (2025). Provinsi Aceh Dalam Angka 2025. Aceh Dalam Angka 2025. https://doi.org/10.25104/mtm.v16i1.840.
  7. Kementerian Pertanian, (2024a). Keputusan Kepala Badan Penyuluhan Dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pertanian Nomor : 227/KPTS/RC.010/I/11/2024, Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Penumbuhan Brigade Pangan.
  8. Asnita, R., Dewi, H.A., Noeriwan, N., Kusuma, I., Lating, A., Trijaya, D.S. and Latifah, E., 2023. Kajian Inovasi Teknologi Budidaya Padi Di Kabupaten Mojokerto. Jurnal Riset Kajian Teknologi dan Lingkungan, 6(1), pp.086–097. https://doi.org/10.58406/jrktl.v6i1.1253.
  9. Maxwell, S., (1996). Food security: a post-modern perspective. Food Policy, [online] 21(2), pp.155–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-9192(95)00074-7.
  10. Food Insecurity and Vulnerability Information and Mapping Systems (FIVIMS), (2005). Guidelines for National Food Insecurity and Vulnerability Information and Mapping Systems (FIVIMS): Background and Principles. Rome: FAO.
  11. Barrett, C. B. (2021). Overcoming global food security challenges through science and solidarity. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 103(2), 422–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12196
  12. Dewan Ketahanan Pangan, (2009). Pedoman Pengukuran Ketersediaan Pangan. Jakarta: Dewan Ketahanan Pangan Republik Indonesia.
  13. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), (2016). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2016. Rome: FAO.
  14. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2020. Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2020. Paris.
  15. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), (2018). The Future of Food and Agriculture: Alternative Pathways to 2050. Rome.
  16. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), (2021). Peningkatan kapasitas petani melalui penyuluhan dan Good Agricultural Practices (GAP). Laporan Teknis IRRI. Filipina.
  17. David, F.R., 2011. Manajemen Strategis; Konsep. 12th ed. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  18. Craig, T. and Robert M. Grant., (1996). Strategic Management. London: Prentice Hall.
  19. Hunger, J.D., Wheelen, T.L. and Thomas, L., (2003). Strategic Management and Business Policy: Achieving Sustainability. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  20. Porter, M.E., (2007). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. Ney York: Free Press.
  21. Kuncoro, M., (2006). Analisis SWOT: Teknik Membedah Kasus Bisnis. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
  22. Arikunto, S., 2020. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  23. Nazir, M., (2003). Metode Penelitian, Cetakan Kelima. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
  24. Kementerian Pertanian, (2024b). Petunjuk teknis Program Brigade Pangan 2024. Jakarta Selatan.
  25. Dinas Pertanian Kabupaten Simeulue, (2023). Data Profil Brigade Pangan Simeulue. Simeulue.
  26. Paul, S., Burman, R.R. and Singh, R., 2024. Training effectiveness evaluation: Advancing a Kirkpatrick model based composite framework. Evaluation and Program Planning, [online] 107, p.102494. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102494.
  27. Hammada, M.A.S., (2024). Tantangan Pertanian Berkelanjutan di Indonesia : Suatu Tinjauan Lingkungan Hidup. 5.
  28. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)., (2023). Panduan pengembangan produk pangan berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Jakarta.
  29. Bank Dunia, (2023). Memperkuat ketahanan ekonomi petani melalui kelembagaan kelompok tani. Laporan Pembangunan Pertanian. Jakarta Selatan.
  30. UNDP, (2023a). Building sustainable and resilient agricultural systems: Policy recommendations for inclusive growth. Amerika Serikat.
  31. Kementerian Desa, (2023). Evaluasi program pemberdayaan petani berbasis desa. Jakarta.
  32. Bappeda Kabupaten Simeulue, (2023). Laporan evaluasi program pertanian berbasis kelompok tani tahun 2023. Simeulue: Bappeda Kabupaten Simeulue.
  33. Kementerian Pertanian, 2023. (2023). Rencana strategis Kementerian Pertanian 2023-2025: Menuju lumbung pangan nasional. Jakarta: Kementan RI.
  34. Balitbangtan Kementan, (2023). Rilis varietas padi adaptif lahan pasang surut untuk wilayah pesisir. Bogor.
  35. Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika (BMKG). (2023). Pandangan Iklim Tahun 2023. Jakarta: Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika
  36. Perum BULOG. (2023). Laporan Tahunan 2023: Menguatkan Eksistensi, Menjaga Ketersediaan Pangan. Jakarta: Perum BULOG.
  37. Bappenas, (2023). Laporan evaluasi dampak pembangunan infrastruktur logistik pertanian di Simeulue. Jakarta.
  38. Mayang, A., & Ratnawati, T. (2020). The Analysis of Internal and External Factors in Determining Business Strategy. Journal of Economics and Business, 4(2), 112-120.
  39. Arifin, B., Haryanto, Y. and Widodo, S. (2021). Sustainable land zoning for food security. Land Use Policy, 104, p. 105321
  40. Suryana, A., Arif, S.S. and Nurdin, E. (2020). Sustainable financing model for smallholder farmers through cooperative scheme. Agricultural Finance Review, 80(3), pp. 345-360.
  41. Tarigan, H., Sinaga, J., & Waluyo. (2022). Dinamika Distribusi dan Logistik Pangan Antar Wilayah: Laporan Analisis Kebijakan. Jakarta: Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian (PSEKP)
  42. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), (2023). Digital inclusion in rural agriculture: Global best practices. Rome.
  43. Fitriani, N., Rahmawati, D. and Nugroho, B., 2022. Market access and its impact on farming intensity: evidence from smallholder rice farmers in Indonesia. Food Policy, 108, p.102234.
  44. Satriawan, H., Fuady, Z., & Fitriana, U. N. (2022). Strategi Adaptasi Petani Padi Sawah Terhadap Perubahan Iklim. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pertanian, 7(1), 250-260.
  45. Nurhayati, N., Amiruddin, A., & Jamil, M. H. (2021). Strategy for Controlling the Conversion of Paddy Fields to Non-Agricultural Land. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 807(4), 042005.
  46. Dariah, A., Susanti, E., & Mulyani, A. (2021). Teknologi Pengelolaan Lahan Sawah untuk Mitigasi Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca. Jurnal Sumberdaya Lahan, 15(2), 89-100.
  47. Junaidi, J., & Arifin, Z. (2023). Institutional Transformation of Agricultural Cooperatives: Challenges and Opportunities in the Digital Era. Journal of Socio-Economics on Tropical Agriculture (JSETA), 5(1), 12-25.
  48. Afrizal, T., Nurhidayati and Saputra, R. (2022). Community participation and institutional support in enhancing cropping intensity: evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 14(3), pp. 112-125.
  49. David, F.R., David, F.R. and David, M.E., 2023. Strategic Management: A Competitive Advantage Approach, Concepts and Cases. 17th ed. New York: Pearson Education.
  50. Saputra, R., Nurhidayati and Afrizal, T. (2021). IoT-based smart irrigation for sustainable agriculture. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 35(4), pp. 112-125.
  51. Prasetyo, D., Suryanto, A. and Mustafa, A. (2021). Integrated policy interventions and local resource utilization in rice farming systems. Agricultural Systems, 193, pp. 103-115.
  52. Arif, S., Isyanto, A. Y., & Suhaeni, S. (2022). Strategi Pengembangan Usahatani Padi Organik Berbasis Kearifan Lokal untuk Meningkatkan Pendapatan Petani. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis (JEPA), 6(1), 215-226.
  53. Zakaria, A., Munir, A., & Pratiwi, I. (2020). Performance of Solar Water Pumping System for Irrigation in Dry Land Farming. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 486(1), 012015. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/486/1/012015
  54. Zhang, Q., Arifin, B. and Saputra, R. (2021). Smart farming technologies for sustainable rice production: a review'. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 185, p. 106125.
  55. Sari, D.W., Prasetyo, A. and Fitriani, N. (2020). Farmer-industry partnership model for sustainable agri-supply chain: case study from Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, p. 120451.
  56. Bijman, J., & Wijers, S. (2019). What Makes a Cooperative Successful? Identifying the Key Success Factors in Dutch Agricultural Cooperatives. International Journal of Cooperative Management, 4(1), 15-28.
  57. Karlan, D., Savonitto, B., Thuysbaert, B., & Udry, C. (2017). Impact of Savings Groups on the Lives of the Poor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(12), 3079-3084.
  58. Willer, H., & Lernoud, J. (Eds.). (2019). The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2019. Frick and Bonn: Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL) and IFOAM – Organics International.
  59. Nurhidayati, Afrizal, T. and Saputra, R. (2022). Precision irrigation for climate-resilient rice farming. Agricultural Water Management, 265, p. 107543.
  60. Aker, J. C. (2011). Dial "A" for Agriculture: A Review of Information and Communication Technologies for Agricultural Extension in Developing Countries. Agricultural Economics, 42(6), 631-647.
  61. Brière, M., & Szafarz, A. (2015). Does Commercial Microfinance Belong to the Financial Sector? Lessons from the Stock Market. World Development, 74, 327-344. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.020

The agricultural sector in Simeulue Regency faces challenges including low productivity, limited infrastructure, and high dependence on external funding. The Food Brigade Program (Program Brigade Pangan) was established as a strategic initiative to enhance production efficiency through the collective management of land areas of at least 200 hectares, supported by adaptive agricultural technology. This study aims to identify internal and external factors influencing rice production enhancement and to formulate development strategies for the Food Brigade Program in Simeulue Regency. The research method employed is a descriptive-quantitative survey using purposive sampling of seven Food Brigade groups, involving a total of 105 respondents. Data analysis was conducted by identifying internal and external environmental factors, evaluated using the Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) and External Factor Evaluation (EFE) matrices, followed by strategy formulation through SWOT analysis. The results indicate that the program's primary strengths lie in the availability of extensive land, adequate water resources (pump irrigation), and high community interest in agricultural innovation. However, the program is constrained by unsustainable monitoring systems and low technology literacy among traditional farmers. The recommended strategy is an aggressive strategy (growth- oriented strategy) utilizing the Strengths-Opportunities (S-O) approach. The implementation of this strategy includes the Land Optimization Program (OPLA) to increase the Cropping Index (IP) from 2 to 2.5, and institutional strengthening through Farmer Field Schools (Sekolah Lapang) and partnerships with post-harvest processing industries. Additionally, diversification of water-saving irrigation systems ("Solar Drip Reservoir System") is required to mitigate climate change impacts, alongside the revitalization of local wisdom such as Kono Lada through Qanun regulations to protect sustainable agricultural land. The integration of technological modernization, cooperative financial independence, and strengthened digital coordination is expected to ensure food sovereignty and farmer welfare in Simeulue Regency.

Keywords : Food Brigade; Rice Production; SWOT Analysis; Simeulue; Farmer Institutions.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe