Authors :
Muhammad Djamir; Sri Endah Wahyuningsih
Volume/Issue :
Volume 5 - 2020, Issue 6 - June
Google Scholar :
http://bitly.ws/9nMw
Scribd :
https://bit.ly/3euqSmL
DOI :
10.38124/IJISRT20JUN104
Abstract :
Law enforcement against the perpetrators of
money laundering crimes in Indonesia is still not
optimal because it is related to other criminal acts
which constitute predicate crimes. This study aims to
find and analyze the process of law enforcement against
the perpetrators of money laundering crimes in the
criminal justice system in Indonesia and the factors that
influence it. The method of approach in this research is
sociological juridical, with primary and secondary data
sources. Primary data were obtained by conducting
interviews with four judges in Sumber District and
Cirebon district courts whereas secondary data is
obtained by conducting a literature study on the
legislation, research results, journals, books, legal
dictionaries. The data obtained were then analyzed
using qualitative descriptive methods. The results
showed that the process of law enforcement for money
laundering in Indonesia is based on Article 69 of Law
Number 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and
Eradication of Money Laundering Criminal Acts,
stipulating that investigations, prosecutions and
examinations at a court hearing cannot be proven.
Predicate crime (predicate crime), as for the factors that
influence the process of law enforcement against the
perpetrators of the factors covering the legislation, lack
of cooperation between law enforcement officials and
the legal culture.
Keywords :
Money Laundering; Criminal Acts; Law Enforcement; Criminal Justice System.
Law enforcement against the perpetrators of
money laundering crimes in Indonesia is still not
optimal because it is related to other criminal acts
which constitute predicate crimes. This study aims to
find and analyze the process of law enforcement against
the perpetrators of money laundering crimes in the
criminal justice system in Indonesia and the factors that
influence it. The method of approach in this research is
sociological juridical, with primary and secondary data
sources. Primary data were obtained by conducting
interviews with four judges in Sumber District and
Cirebon district courts whereas secondary data is
obtained by conducting a literature study on the
legislation, research results, journals, books, legal
dictionaries. The data obtained were then analyzed
using qualitative descriptive methods. The results
showed that the process of law enforcement for money
laundering in Indonesia is based on Article 69 of Law
Number 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and
Eradication of Money Laundering Criminal Acts,
stipulating that investigations, prosecutions and
examinations at a court hearing cannot be proven.
Predicate crime (predicate crime), as for the factors that
influence the process of law enforcement against the
perpetrators of the factors covering the legislation, lack
of cooperation between law enforcement officials and
the legal culture.
Keywords :
Money Laundering; Criminal Acts; Law Enforcement; Criminal Justice System.