Authors : Syarifah Zaimuratasya; Choirul Anam; Heri Sutanto; Dito A. Rukmana

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 8 - August

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3pvmpc8j

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/y3bs2pbs

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24AUG732

Abstract : This study aimed to fabricate thyroid shields made from Silicone Rubber (SR)-Cooper (Cu) material, analyze the effectiveness of SR-Cu shields in reducing radiation dose, and compare them with tube current modulation (TCM) in computed tomography (CT) examination. Thyroid shields were made from SR-Cu with Cu percentages of 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20%. The thyroid shields were positioned over the neck of the anthropomorphic phantom. Scanning was performed using a GE 128-slice CT scanner with fixed tube current of 150 mA and tube current modulation (TCM). The elatiscity of thyroid shields was tested using an universal testing machine (UTM). The ability of thyroid shields for dose reduction was measured using a 10X6-3CT Radcal detector, and quality of the resulted images was characterized with metric of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the anterior, posterior, and lateral areas of the neck area of anthropomorphic phantom. It is found that the elasticity of the thyroid shields increased from 0.09 to 0.12 N/mm2 for Cu percentages from 0 to 20%. The measured dose decreased as the percentage of Cu increased. 20% of SR-Cu was able to reduce the dose by 32.4% for the fix tube current. In comparison, the TCM technique reduced the dose by 44.5%. Therefore, dose reduction using the developed shields is lower than using TCM approach. It is also found that implementation of the thyroid shields did not reduce image quality significantly. It is found that there were no apparent artifacts in the images. The highest SNR was found in the image with 20% SR-Cu, which was 3.84. In comparison, the SNR using the TCM approach was 3.59. In conclusion SR-Cu shields were successfully developed and they reduced dose with relatively consistent of image quality.

Keywords : SR-Cu Thyroid Shielding, Tube Current Modulation, Dose Absorption, Image Quality, CT.

References :

1. Jawas, N. (2017). Segmentasi Bagian Paru-Paru di Citra 2D CT-Scan. E-Proceedings KNS&I STIKOM Bali, 803-808.
2. Lewis MA, Edyvean S. Patient dose reduction in CT. Br J Radiol. 2005;78(934):880-883.
3. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(22):2277-2284. 
4. Lawrence S and Seeram E. (2017). The current use and effectiveness of bismuth shields in computed tomography: a systematic review Radiol. Open. J. 2 7–16.
5. Franck, C., Smeets, P., Lapeire, L., Achten, E., & Bacher, K. (2018). Estimating the Patient-specific Dose to the Thyroid and Breasts and Overall Risk in Chest CT When Using Organ-based Tube Current Modulation. Radiology, 288(1), 164–169.
6. Riyanto, S., Budo, W.S., & Anam, C. (2019). Pengaruh Arus Tabung Terhadap Noise dan Kontras Citra pada Pesawat CT-Scan. Berkala Fisika, 22(3), 105-109.
7. Saeedi-Moghadam, Mahdi & Tayebi, Mansour & Chegeni, Nahid & Sina, Sedigheh & Kolayi, Tayebeh. (2020). Efficiency of non-lead and lead thyroid shields in radiation protection of CT examinations. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 180. 109265.
8. Rego SL., Yu L., Bruesewitz MR., Vrieze TJ., et al. CARE Dose4D CT Automatic Exposure Control System : Physics Principles and Practical Hints. Radiol. Soc. North Am. 2007 Sci. Assem. Annu. Meet. 2007.
9. Haaga, J. R., Miraldi, F., MacIntyre, W., Lipuma, J. P., Bryan, P. J. and Wiesen, E., (1981). The effect of mAs variation upon computed tomography image quality as evaluated by in vivo and in vitro studies. Radiology, 138(2), 449-454.
10. Susanto, B. 2019. Fabrikasi Filter Radioprotektif Berbahan SR RTV 52-Al untuk Aplikasi Radiodiagnostik Menggunakan Digital Radiografi (DR). Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
11. Sutanto, H., Irdawati, Y., Anam, C., Fujibuchi, T., Dougherty, G., Hidayanto, E., Arifin, Z., Soedarsono, J. W., & Bahrudin (2020). An artifact-free thyroid shield in CT examination: a phantom study. Biomedical physics & engineering express, 6(1), 015029.
12. Kessel, I dan O’Connor, J.T. (1997) Getting the Lead Out: The Complete Resource on How to Prevent and Cope with Lead Poisoning. Published by Plenum Trade, New York.
13. Halliday, D., Resnick, R. and Walker, J. (2014) Fundamental of Physics. 10th Edition, Wiley and Sons, New York.
14. Wijesinghe P, Kennedy BF, Sampson DD. Optical Elastography On The Microscale. Tissue Elast. Imaging. 2020; 185–229.
15. Araby, Sherif & Zhang, Liqun & Kuan, Hsu-Chiang & Dai, Jia-Bin & Majewski, Peter & MA, Jun. (2013). A novel approach to electrically and thermally conductive elastomers using graphene. Polymer. 54. 3663-3670.
16. Kang H, Zuo K, Wang Z, Zhang L, Liu L and Guo B 2014 Using a green method to develop graphene oxide/elastomers nanocomposites with combination of high barrier and mechanical performance. Compos. Sci. Technol. 92 1–8.
17. Yang, Heng & Yao, XueFeng & Zheng, Zhong & Gong, LingHui & Yuan, Li & Yuan, Yanan & Liu, YingHua. (2018). Highly sensitive and stretchable graphene-silicone rubber composites for strain sensing. Composites Science and Technology. 167.
18. Lee YH, Park ET, Cho PK, et al. Comparative analysis of radiation dose and image quality between thyroid shields and unshields during CT examination of the neck. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(3):611-615.
19. Matsubara K, Sugai M, Toyoda A, et al. Assessment of an organ-based tube current modulation in thoracic computed tomography. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012;13(2):3731.
20. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al. Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology. 2004;233(3):649-657.