Authors :
Georgie E. Brogada; Manuel V. Estera
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 5 - May
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/4bn7fntm
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/2kbk9bnm
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26May494
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
This study examined the types of parental engagement that shape social skills and enhanced the academic success
of Key Stage students. Anchored in Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory, Social Learning Theory, and Epstein’s
School-Family Partnership Model, the research analyzed students’ perceptions of parental engagement in school-based
activities, home-based academic support, communication with teachers, and extracurricular participation. Findings
revealed that visible and consistent parental engagement positively influenced students’ confidence, cooperation, motivation,
self-regulation, and academic engagement. Parental modeling, collaborative parent-teacher communication, and structured
home support were identified as key mechanisms fostering both social competence and academic responsibility. However,
challenges such as limited parental time, communication barriers, socioeconomic constraints, and varying parental capacity
constrained effective involvement. Based on these findings, a structured School and Home Partnership Program was
proposed to strengthen collaboration, enhance parental capacity, and address identified barriers. The study
underscores the importance of sustained, balanced, and inclusive parental engagement in promoting holistic student
development. The study employed a descriptive research design using student respondents to capture lived experiences
and perceptions of parental involvement across multiple contexts. Data was analyzed to determine how different
forms of engagement contributed to both social development and academic outcomes. Results indicated that students were
more positively influenced by direct, observable parental participation than by formal or symbolic involvement. The
alignment of expectations between home and school emerged as a crucial factor in promoting discipline, accountability,
and emotional security among learners. These findings emphasize that parental involvement functions as a
multidimensional support system that extends beyond academic assistance to include social modeling and motivational
reinforcement.
Furthermore, the study highlights the need for schools to institutionalize inclusive and flexible strategies that
accommodate parents’ diverse capacities and circumstances by recognizing barriers to participation and addressing them
through structured programs, schools can cultivate stronger partnerships that benefit learners’ overall development. The
proposed framework provides practical guidance for educators and policymakersseeking to transform parental involvement
into a sustained and strategic component of school improvement efforts, ultimately contributing to improved student wellbeing, social competence, and academic performance.
Keywords :
Parental Engagement, Social Development, Academic Success, Key Stage 3 Learners.
References :
- Alley, M. (2019). Student goal-setting and motivation in literacy learning. Journal of Educational Research, 112(3), 345–357.
- Baker, J. A., Grant, S., & Morlock, L. (2016). The teacher-student relationship as a developmental context for children with internalizing or externalizing behavior problems. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(1), 3-15.
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.
- Barber, C., & Klauda, S. (2020). How reading engagement influences academic achievement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1083–1097.
- Barkley, E., & Major, C. (2020). Engaged reading: Strategies for motivation and comprehension. Jossey-Bass.
- Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., & Buntins, K. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through goal-setting in literacy instruction. Frontiers in Education, 5(1), 22–34.
- Benner, A. D., Boyle, A. E., & Sadler, S. (2016). Parental involvement and adolescents’ educational success: The roles of prior achievement and socioeconomic status. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(6), 1053-1064.
- Biel, C., Buzhardt, J., Brown, R., & Romano, M. (2020). Repeated reading interventions and their impact on fluency. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(4), 289–307.
- Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Self-efficacy in literacy learning: A key to student motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 449–471.
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design.
- Chao, R., Kanatsu, A., & Yamada, H. (2016. Parenting practices and adolescent academic achievement across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(2), 246-260.
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
- Delfino, A. (2019). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation in reading: Balancing rewards and engagement. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 141–156.
- Denhams, S. A., Bassett, H. H., & Zinsser, K. M. (2019). Early childhood teachers as socializers of young children’s emotional competence. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47(1), 1–9.
- Department of Education. (2023). MATATG education agenda (Deped Memorandum No. 54, s. 2023).
- El Nokali, N. E., Bachman, H. J., & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2015). Parent involvement and children’s academic and social development in elementary school. Child Development, 81(3), 988-1005.
- Epstein, J. L. (1995). School/family community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(9), 701–712.
- Fredricks, J. Reschly, A., & Christenson, S. (2019). Motivation and engagement in reading: The role of autonomy and choice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59.
- Garbacz, S. A., Sheridan, S. M., & Konziol, N. A. (2018). Family engagement in rural schools: Implications for parent-child learning. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(3), 379–390.
- Gersten, R., & Haymond, K. (2020). Structured literacy interventions for disadvantaged learners. Exceptional Children, 86(2), 117–134.
- Goodall, J., & Montgomery, C. (2019). Parental involvement to parental engagement: A continuum. Education Review, 71(1), 55–67.
- Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2015). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740-763.
- Hill, N. E., Witherspoon, D.P., & Bartz, D. (2018). Parental involvement in education during early adolescence: Implications for school adjustment and achievement. Developmental Psychology, 54(9), 1741-1752.
- Hornby, G., & Blackwell, I. (2018). Barriers to parental involvement in education: An update. Educational Review, 70(1), 109–119.
- Hudson, R., Moore, J., & Han, S. (2021). Reducing the achievement gap through structured reading interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(5), 345–359.
- Joussemet, M., Landry, R., & Koestner, R. (2018). A self-determination theory perspective on parenting. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 194-200.
- Kelly, J., & Phillips, L. (2022). Enhancing reading comprehension through explicit strategy instruction, Reading Psychology, 43(7), 621–639.
- Kim, J., Burkhauser, M., & Mesite, L. (2021). Systematic Early Literacy Interventions: Effects on Motivation and Achievement. Elementary School Journal, 121(3), 429–452.
- Kim, Y., & Hill, N. E. (2022). The Role of Parental Involvement in Adolescents’ Academic Achievement. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 32(2), 345–360.
- Lau, E. Y. H., & Lee, K. (2021). Parents’ views on young children’s distance learning and screen time during Covid-19. Early Education and Development, 32(6), 863–879.
- Liu, Y., Black, E., & Algina, J. (2020). The effects of digital communication between parents and schools on student outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2481-2499.
- Malecka, B., Boud, D., & Carless, D. (2022). Parental Support and Children’s Reading Engagement: A Family Literacy Perspective. Educational Review, 74(40, 563–581.
- Masten, A. S., & Tellegen, A. (2017). Resilience in developmental psychopathology: Contributions of family and school environments. Development and Psychopathology, 24(2), 345-361.
- Masters, G. (2022). Supporting School Improvement through Effective Parental Engagement. Australian Council for Educational Research.
- McBreen, M., & Savage, R. (2021). Teacher Modeling and Reading Motivation: Inspiring a culture of Literacy. Literacy Research and Instruction, 60(4), 307–325.
- McNeal, R. B. (2015). Parent involvement, academic achievement, and the role of student attitudes and behaviors as mediators. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(8), 564-576.
- Mehigan, K. (2020). Creating Safe and Supportive Reading Environments for Literacy Growth. Irish Educational Studies, 39(2), 267–283.
- Minor, C. (2023). Personalized Learning in Literacy Interventions: Building Confidence and Competence. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 66(5), 435–444.
- Moroni, S., Dumont, H., Trautwein, U., Niggli, A., & Baeriwsyly, F. (2015). The need to distinguish between quantity and quality in research on parental involvement. The Journal of Educational Research, 108(5), 417-431.
- Neuenschwander, M. P., Vida, M., Garrett, J. L., & Eccles, J. S. (2016). Parents’ expectations and students’ achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 761-775.
- Nieuwoudt, J. (2022). The Importance of Social Skills for Academic Success: A review. International Journal of Educational Research, 112.
- Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Nelson, L. J. (2017). Parenting and the development of prosocial behavior in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 56, 123-132.
- Perez, T., Cromley, J. G., & Kaplan, A. (2018). The role of parental expectations in shaping students’ academic engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 1-12.
- Pomerantz, E. M., Moorman, E. A., & Shamah, R. (2019). Parenting beliefs, parental stress, and social-emotional development in children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21(3), 389-398.
- Reschly, A., & Christenson, S. (2022). Motivation and Reading Development: A Framework for Practice. Educational Psychologist, 57(2), 112–125.
- Rudd, L., Lambert, J., Satterwhite, M., & Smith, C. (2020). Differentiated Reading Instruction: Supporting Diverse Learners in Literacy. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(1), 45–62.
- Sheldon, S. B., & Jung, S. B. (2015). The family engagement partnership student outcome evaluation. School Community Journal, 25(2), 147-167.
- Spear-Swerling, L. (2019). Structured Literacy and Its Role in Early Reading Intervention. Annals of Dyslexia, 69(1), 1–20.
- Spinrad, T. L., Eisenberg, N., & Gaertner, B. (2017). Measures of effortful regulation for young children. Infant Mental Health Journal, 28(6), 606-626.
- Tan, C. Y., Lyu, M., & Peng, W.J. (2019). Academic Benefits from Parental Involvement are Stratified by Parental Socioeconomic Status: A Meta-analysis. Parenting: Science and Practice, 19(3), 241–257.
- Thompson, B. (2019). Parent-school digital communication and student achievement.
- Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(2), 236-254.
- Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
- Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2016. Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on students’ academic and social development. Child Development, 83(3), 877-895.
- Wentzel, K., Russell, S., & Baker, S. (2016). Emotional support and prosocial behavior in adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(5), 674-689.
- Wilder, S. (2018). Effects of Parental Involvement on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Synthesis. Educational Review, 70(1), 1–17.
- Yamamoto, Y., & Holloway, S. D. (2015). Parental expectations and children’s academic performance in sociocultural context. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 189-214.
- Yu, G., Gao, X., & Wang, L. (2021). Collaborative Learning in Literacy Development: peer discussions and reading comprehension. Journal of Second Language Writing, 55.
This study examined the types of parental engagement that shape social skills and enhanced the academic success
of Key Stage students. Anchored in Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory, Social Learning Theory, and Epstein’s
School-Family Partnership Model, the research analyzed students’ perceptions of parental engagement in school-based
activities, home-based academic support, communication with teachers, and extracurricular participation. Findings
revealed that visible and consistent parental engagement positively influenced students’ confidence, cooperation, motivation,
self-regulation, and academic engagement. Parental modeling, collaborative parent-teacher communication, and structured
home support were identified as key mechanisms fostering both social competence and academic responsibility. However,
challenges such as limited parental time, communication barriers, socioeconomic constraints, and varying parental capacity
constrained effective involvement. Based on these findings, a structured School and Home Partnership Program was
proposed to strengthen collaboration, enhance parental capacity, and address identified barriers. The study
underscores the importance of sustained, balanced, and inclusive parental engagement in promoting holistic student
development. The study employed a descriptive research design using student respondents to capture lived experiences
and perceptions of parental involvement across multiple contexts. Data was analyzed to determine how different
forms of engagement contributed to both social development and academic outcomes. Results indicated that students were
more positively influenced by direct, observable parental participation than by formal or symbolic involvement. The
alignment of expectations between home and school emerged as a crucial factor in promoting discipline, accountability,
and emotional security among learners. These findings emphasize that parental involvement functions as a
multidimensional support system that extends beyond academic assistance to include social modeling and motivational
reinforcement.
Furthermore, the study highlights the need for schools to institutionalize inclusive and flexible strategies that
accommodate parents’ diverse capacities and circumstances by recognizing barriers to participation and addressing them
through structured programs, schools can cultivate stronger partnerships that benefit learners’ overall development. The
proposed framework provides practical guidance for educators and policymakersseeking to transform parental involvement
into a sustained and strategic component of school improvement efforts, ultimately contributing to improved student wellbeing, social competence, and academic performance.
Keywords :
Parental Engagement, Social Development, Academic Success, Key Stage 3 Learners.