Evaluation of the Sofa Score in Predicating Outcome of Sepsis Patients Admitted to a Tertiary Care Center in Nepal


Authors : Sharad Khanal; Birendra Kumar Yadav; Aabishkar Subedi

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 8 - August

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yc4fkk85

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bdmn2hmu

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24AUG586

Abstract : Background Sepsis is a major health burden with life- threatening conditions, which leads to a high rate of mortality in patients. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, which assesses organ dysfunction across multiple systems, has been considered a reliable indicator of the severity of critical illness. We have carried out this study to evaluate the predictive value of the SOFA score in assessing the mortality of patients with sepsis on admission.  Methods Our study was a cross-sectional, descriptive study carried out in patients with sepsis who were admitted to the medical ICU of Chitwan Medical College from December 15, 2021, to December 14, 2022. Patient sampling was done based on a non-probability convenience sampling technique.  Results In a study of 130 patients, 54.6% were male and 45.4% were female. The mean SOFA score was 7.1, with a median of 7. 38.5% (50 patients) died due to sepsis. The mean SOFA score was higher among deceased patients (9.3) than survivors (5.8). Higher SOFA scores were associated with increased mortality. 46% of patients required inotropes/Vasopressor support for shock. Patients requiring vasopressor support had a significantly higher mortality rate (53.3%) compared to those who did not need support (25.7%). 13.1% of patients required mechanical ventilatory support, and the majority of these patients (70.6%) had mortality.  Conclusion SOFA score is a valuable tool to assess organ dysfunctions and it can predict the outcome of patients admitted with sepsis.

Keywords : Assessment Score, Mortality, Sepsis, Sequential Organ Failure.

References :

  1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour C, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). Vol. 315, JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. American Medical Association; 2016. p. 801–10.
  2. Doi K, Estenssoro E, Ferrer R, Hodgson C, Møller MH, Jacob S, et al. Bin Du 28 Charles Gomersall 31 Mark Nunnally 47 Charles L. Sprung 57. Vol. 49. 2021. Available from: www.ccmjournal.org
  3. Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NKJ, Hartog CS, Tsaganos T, Schlattmann P, et al. Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis current estimates and limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb 1;193(3):259–72.
  4. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. The Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200–11.
  5. Torio CM, Moore BJ. National inpatient hospital costs: the most expensive conditions by payer, 2013: statistical brief 204. Healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP) statistical briefs. 2006;2006–16.
  6. Fleischmann-Struzek C, Mellhammar L, Rose N, Cassini A, Rudd KE, Schlattmann P, et al. Incidence and mortality of hospital- and ICU-treated sepsis: results from an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis. Vol. 46, Intensive Care Medicine. Springer; 2020. p. 1552–62.
  7. Lakhey S, Karki B, Shrestha B, Shakya S, Pandey SB. Sepsis: a private hospital experience in Nepal. Journal of Institute of Medicine Nepal. 2007 Jan 8;28(1):12–5. Available from: https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JIOM/article/view/428
  8. Font MD, Thyagarajan B, Khanna AK. Sepsis and Septic Shock – Basics of diagnosis, pathophysiology and clinical decision making. Vol. 104, Medical Clinics of North America. W.B. Saunders; 2020. p. 573–85.
  9. Lamichhane S, Manandhar N, Dhakal S, Shakya YL. Management and Outcome of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2018 Jul 3;16(2):165–71.
  10. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendon~a A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis.related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Vol. 22, Intensive Care Med. Springer-Verlag; 1996.
  11. Lambden S, Laterre PF, Levy MM, Francois B. The SOFA score - Development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials. Vol. 23, Critical Care. BioMed Central Ltd.; 2019.
  12. Murthy S, Leligdowicz A, Adhikari NKJ. Intensive care unit capacity in low-income countries: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2015 Jan 24;10(1).
  13. Acharya SP. Critical care medicine in Nepal: where are we? Vol. 5, International health. 2013. p. 92–5.
  14. Safari S, Shojaee M, Rahmati F, Barartloo A, Hahshemi B, Forouzanfar MM, et al. Accuracy of SOFA score in prediction of 30-day outcome of critically ill patients. Turk J Emerg Med. 2016 Dec 1;16(4):146–50.
  15. Kamath AC, Harsoor S. original article Study of sofa score for predicting the outcome of patients admitted in ICU at BTGH. 2020.
  16. Pölkki A, Pekkarinen PT, Takala J, Selander T, Reinikainen M. Association of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) components with mortality. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Jul 1;66(6):731–41.
  17. Gupta T, Puskarich MA, DeVos E, Javed A, Smotherman C, Sterling SA, et al. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Component Score Prediction of In-hospital Mortality From Sepsis. J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug 1;35(8):810–7.
  18. Weng L, Zeng X ying, Yin P, Wang L jun, Wang C yao, Jiang W, et al. Sepsis-related mortality in China: a descriptive analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jul 1;44(7):1071–80.
  19. Wardi G, Tainter CR, Ramnath VR, Brennan JJ, Tolia V, Castillo EM, et al. Age-related incidence and outcomes of sepsis in California, 2008–2015. J Crit Care. 2021 Apr 1;62:212–7.
  20. Yang Y, Yang KS, Hsann YM, Lim V, Ong BC. The effect of comorbidity and age on hospital mortality and length of stay in patients with sepsis. J Crit Care. 2010 Sep;25(3):398–405.
  21. Basnet B, Bhandari R, Moore M. Initial resuscitation for Australasian Triage Scale 2 patients in a Nepalese emergency department. Emergency Medicine Australasia. 2012;24(4):430–4.
  22. Van Vught LA, Klouwenberg PMCK, Spitoni C, Scicluna BP, Wiewel MA, Horn J, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and attributable mortality of secondary infections in the intensive care unit after admission for sepsis. JAMA. 2016;315(14):1469–79.
  23. Fuller BM, Mohr NM, Dettmer M, Kennedy S, Cullison K, Bavolek R, et al. Mechanical ventilation and acute lung injury in emergency department patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: An observational study. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2013 Jul;20(7):659–69.
  24. Vincent JL, Jones G, David S, Olariu E, Cadwell KK. Frequency and mortality of septic shock in Europe and North America: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2019 May 31;23(1).
  25. Oh Y, Roh J, Lee J, Chung HS, Lee K, Lee MK. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score as a predictor of mortality in ventilated patients with multidrug-resistant bacteremia. Acute and Critical Care. 2020 Aug 1;35(3):169–78.
  26. Gu WJ, Wang F, Tang L, Liu JC. Single-dose etomidate does not increase mortality in patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Chest. 2015 Feb 1;147(2):335–46.
  27. Minne L, Abu-Hanna A, de Jonge E. Evaluation of SOFA-based models for predicting mortality in the ICU: A systematic review. Vol. 12, Critical Care. 2008.
  28. Jones AE, Trzeciak S, Kline JA. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for predicting outcome in patients with severe sepsis and evidence of hypoperfusion at the time of emergency department presentation. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(5):1649–54.

Background Sepsis is a major health burden with life- threatening conditions, which leads to a high rate of mortality in patients. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, which assesses organ dysfunction across multiple systems, has been considered a reliable indicator of the severity of critical illness. We have carried out this study to evaluate the predictive value of the SOFA score in assessing the mortality of patients with sepsis on admission.  Methods Our study was a cross-sectional, descriptive study carried out in patients with sepsis who were admitted to the medical ICU of Chitwan Medical College from December 15, 2021, to December 14, 2022. Patient sampling was done based on a non-probability convenience sampling technique.  Results In a study of 130 patients, 54.6% were male and 45.4% were female. The mean SOFA score was 7.1, with a median of 7. 38.5% (50 patients) died due to sepsis. The mean SOFA score was higher among deceased patients (9.3) than survivors (5.8). Higher SOFA scores were associated with increased mortality. 46% of patients required inotropes/Vasopressor support for shock. Patients requiring vasopressor support had a significantly higher mortality rate (53.3%) compared to those who did not need support (25.7%). 13.1% of patients required mechanical ventilatory support, and the majority of these patients (70.6%) had mortality.  Conclusion SOFA score is a valuable tool to assess organ dysfunctions and it can predict the outcome of patients admitted with sepsis.

Keywords : Assessment Score, Mortality, Sepsis, Sequential Organ Failure.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe