Evaluating the Gap in Specialised Training for Container Ship Deck Officers: Implications for Maritime Safety


Authors : Svilen Velinov

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 3 - March

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/ftd67dte

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/29e6vuep

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar1675

PlumX Metrics

Semantic Scholar

ResearchGate

IJISRT Repository

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.

Abstract : Container ships play a vital role in global trade by transporting a significant portion of general cargo worldwide. Despite extensive safety regulations, accidents continue to occur, often due to human error and non-compliance with mandatory cargo stowage and securing requirements. This study analyses the need for specialised training for seafarers responsible for cargo operations on container ships to ensure compliance with International Maritime Organization (IMO) regulations and reduce accidents. A review of statistical data on container ship accidents, a comparative analysis of training standards for different vessel types, and an examination of current IMO regulations related to container ship crew training were conducted. The analysis revealed that human error is the largest contributing factor to accidents, and a significant proportion of safety recommendations are related to cargo handling and transportation. However, the STCW Code and IMO model courses lack specialized training for container ship deck officers, in contrast to the extensive training provided for tanker officers. A survey of nautical students who completed their first contract as junior cadets on container ships confirmed the findings, highlighting the need for ship type-specific training. The study recommends that the IMO review the current training standards for container ships and consider introducing type-specific training for all crew joining container ships to address this gap and improve maritime safety.

Keywords : Container Ships; Maritime Safety; Crew Training; Specialised Training.

References :

  1. Raunek, “Top 22 World’s Biggest And Largest Container Ships in 2024,” Marine Insight, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://www.marineinsight.com /know-more/top-10-worlds-largest-container-ships-in-2019/
  2. Chen Yang, “27500 TEU!! Here comes the world’s largest container ship!,” Xinde Marine News. [Online]. Available: https://www.xindemarinenews. com/m/view.php?aid=56265
  3. J. Ge, M. Zhu, M. Sha, T. Notteboom, W. Shi, and X. Wang, “Towards 25,000 TEU vessels? A comparative economic analysis of ultra-large containership sizes under different market and operational conditions,” Marit Econ Logist, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 587–614, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1057/s41278-019-00136-4.
  4. R. J. Sánchez, D. E. Perrotti, and A. G. P. Fort, “Looking into the future ten years later: big full containerships and their arrival to south American ports,” J. shipp. trd., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 2, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s41072-021-00083-5.
  5. B. Musso, “The Evolution of Maritime Container Transportation,” in Analytical Decision-Making Methods for Evaluating Sustainable Transport in European Corridors, vol. 11, I. M. Lami, Ed., in SxI - Springer for Innovation / SxI - Springer per l’Innovazione, vol. 11. , Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014, pp. 33–43. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04786-7_3.
  6. International Maritime Organization, Ed., Casualty investigation code: code of international standards and recommended practices for a safety investigation into a marine casualty or marine incident, 2008 ed. in IMO publication. London: IMO, 2008.
  7. IMO, “Revised harmonized reporting procedures – Reports required under SOLAS regulations I/21 and XI-1/6, and MARPOL, articles 8 and 12.” International Maritime Organization, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/MSAS/Documents/MSC-MEPC3/MSC-MEPC.3-Circ.4%20Rev%201%20%20Revised%20harmonized%20reporting%20procedures%20-%20Reports%20required%20under%20SOLAS%20regulations%20I21.pdf
  8. B. Li, J. Lu, H. Lu, and J. Li, “Predicting maritime accident consequence scenarios for emergency response decisions using optimization-based decision tree approach,” Maritime Policy & Management, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 19–41, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1080/03088839.2021.1959074.
  9. X. Ma, W. Deng, W. Qiao, and H. Lan, “A methodology to quantify the risk propagation of hazardous events for ship grounding accidents based on directed CN,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 221, p. 108334, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108334.
  10. S. Fan, Z. Yang, J. Wang, and J. Marsland, “Shipping accident analysis in restricted waters: Lesson from the Suez Canal blockage in 2021,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 266, p. 113119, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113119.
  11. J. Weng and D. Yang, “Investigation of shipping accident injury severity and mortality,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 76, pp. 92–101, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.01.002.
  12. B. Navas De Maya and R. E. Kurt, “Marine Accident Learning with Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (MALFCMs): A case study on bulk carrier’s accident contributors,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 208, p. 107197, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107197.
  13. J. Chen, W. Bian, Z. Wan, S. Wang, H. Zheng, and C. Cheng, “Factor assessment of marine casualties caused by total loss,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 47, p. 101560, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101560.
  14. L. Gucma, A. Androjna, K. Łazuga, P. Vidmar, and M. Perkovič, “Reconstructing Maritime Incidents and Accidents Using Causal Models for Safety Improvement: Based on a Case Study,” JMSE, vol. 9, no. 12, p. 1414, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.3390/jmse9121414.
  15. J. Chen, W. Bian, Z. Wan, Z. Yang, H. Zheng, and P. Wang, “Identifying factors influencing total-loss marine accidents in the world: Analysis and evaluation based on ship types and sea regions,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 191, p. 106495, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106495.
  16. D. Chen, Y. Pei, and Q. Xia, “Research on human factors cause chain of ship accidents based on multidimensional association rules,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 218, p. 107717, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107717.
  17. U. Yıldırım, E. Başar, and Ö. Uğurlu, “Assessment of collisions and grounding accidents with human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) and statistical methods,” Safety Science, vol. 119, pp. 412–425, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.022.
  18. F. Paolo et al., “Investigating the Role of the Human Element in Maritime Accidents using Semi-Supervised Hierarchical Methods,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 52, pp. 252–259, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2021.01.029.
  19. Anish Hebbar, Clever Tugume, and Jens-Uwe Schroeder-Hinrichs, “A statistical overview of containerships casualties.” World Maritime University, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://docs. imo.org/Shared/Download.aspx?did=150891
  20. IMO GISIS, “GISIS: Marine Casualties and Incidents 2015-2025.” 2025. [Online]. Available: https:// gisis.imo.org/Members/MCIR/Search.aspx
  21. IMO, Ed., International code on the enhanced programme of inspections during surveys of bulk carriers and oil tankers, 2011: 2011 ESP code, Fourth edition, 2020 edition. in IMO publication. London: IMO, 2020.
  22. IMO, IGF Code: international code of safety for ships using gases or other low-flashpoint fuels, 2016 edition. in IMO publication. London: International Maritime Organization, 2016.
  23. IMO, Master and chief mate, Rev. ed. 2014. in Model course, no. 7.01. London: IMO, 2014.
  24. IMO, Ed., Officer in charge of a navigational watch, 2014 ed., rev. Ed. in Model course, no. 7.03. London: IMO, 2014.

Container ships play a vital role in global trade by transporting a significant portion of general cargo worldwide. Despite extensive safety regulations, accidents continue to occur, often due to human error and non-compliance with mandatory cargo stowage and securing requirements. This study analyses the need for specialised training for seafarers responsible for cargo operations on container ships to ensure compliance with International Maritime Organization (IMO) regulations and reduce accidents. A review of statistical data on container ship accidents, a comparative analysis of training standards for different vessel types, and an examination of current IMO regulations related to container ship crew training were conducted. The analysis revealed that human error is the largest contributing factor to accidents, and a significant proportion of safety recommendations are related to cargo handling and transportation. However, the STCW Code and IMO model courses lack specialized training for container ship deck officers, in contrast to the extensive training provided for tanker officers. A survey of nautical students who completed their first contract as junior cadets on container ships confirmed the findings, highlighting the need for ship type-specific training. The study recommends that the IMO review the current training standards for container ships and consider introducing type-specific training for all crew joining container ships to address this gap and improve maritime safety.

Keywords : Container Ships; Maritime Safety; Crew Training; Specialised Training.

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe