Authors :
Prasanth. K; Shilpachandran. K
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 6 - June
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/yc6jrujy
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jun1245
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Background and Objectives:
The primary aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of ELDOA technique and Mckenzie protocol techniques for
patients with mechanical neck pain.
Methodology:
Study design – Experimental study. 30 subjects were enrolled in the study both male and female gender. Subjects were
enrolled by using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pre – test and post- test were taken on Visual Analogue Scale and Neck
Disability Index to evaluate pain and disability respectively.
Result:
Both groups revealed an improvement in VAS and NDI scores post-intervention (p < 0.05). Group A (ELDOA) presented
more improvement in pain and disability reduction compared to Group B (McKenzie), and the differences between the two
groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
ELDOA was proven to be more effective than McKenzie protocol for decreasing pain and functional disability in
patients with mechanical neck pain. Thus, ELDOA may be a better intervention in clinical settings for the management of
mechanical neck pain.
Keywords :
Mechanical Neck Pain, ELDOA Technique, Mckenzie Protocol Technique, Visual Analogue Scale, Neck Disability Index.
References :
- Hall T, Briffa K, Hopper D. Clinical evaluation of cervicogenic headache: a clinical perspective. J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(2):73-80.
- McKenzie R, May S. The Cervical and Thoracic Spine: Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy. 2nd ed. Spinal Publications; 2006.
- Myers TW. Anatomy Trains: Myofascial Meridians for Manual and Movement Therapists. 4th ed. Elsevier; 2020.
- Biondi DM. Cervicogenic headache: a review of diagnostic and treatment strategies. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005;105(4 Suppl 2):16S-22S.
- Kuchera ML, Kuchera WA. Osteopathic Considerations in Systemic Dysfunction. 2nd ed. Greyden Press; 1994.
- Michalsen A, Jeitler M, Brunnhuber S. Manual therapy in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(3):220-229.
- Bove GM. Mechanisms of manual therapy. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2008;12(3):266-270.
- Ernst E. A review of systematic reviews of spinal manipulation. J R Soc Med. 2002;95(6):328-334.
- Dunning JR, Butts R, Mourad F, et al. Spinal manipulation and dry needling in patients with neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(6):443-452.
- Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14(7):409-415.
Background and Objectives:
The primary aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of ELDOA technique and Mckenzie protocol techniques for
patients with mechanical neck pain.
Methodology:
Study design – Experimental study. 30 subjects were enrolled in the study both male and female gender. Subjects were
enrolled by using inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pre – test and post- test were taken on Visual Analogue Scale and Neck
Disability Index to evaluate pain and disability respectively.
Result:
Both groups revealed an improvement in VAS and NDI scores post-intervention (p < 0.05). Group A (ELDOA) presented
more improvement in pain and disability reduction compared to Group B (McKenzie), and the differences between the two
groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
ELDOA was proven to be more effective than McKenzie protocol for decreasing pain and functional disability in
patients with mechanical neck pain. Thus, ELDOA may be a better intervention in clinical settings for the management of
mechanical neck pain.
Keywords :
Mechanical Neck Pain, ELDOA Technique, Mckenzie Protocol Technique, Visual Analogue Scale, Neck Disability Index.