Effects of Urbanization on Jos Wildlife Park and Environs Using Geospatial Technology


Authors : Ogunmola James Kehinde; Malangale Albert; Omada Meshach Arome; Hyelduku Mwada Aliyu; Gajere Nabit Caleb

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 2 - February


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3pa26ssd

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/shs44833

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26feb295

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Urbanization poses a significant threat to protected ecosystems, particularly in rapidly growing cities . This study assessed the effects of urbanization on land use/land cover (LULC) dynamics and habitat integrity of Jos Wildlife Park and its environs, Plateau State, Nigeria, over a 35-year period (1988–2023). Using multi-temporal Landsat satellite imageries (TM, ETM+, and OLI/TIRS) integrated with Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques, supervised classification was employed to map and quantify changes in five major LULC classes: vegetation, built-up areas, farmland, bare land, and rocky outcrops. Ground truthing using GPS data and high-resolution imagery supported classification accuracy assessment. The results revealed pronounced urban-induced landscape transformation within and around the park. Vegetation cover declined drastically from 904.70 ha (52.51%) in 1988 to 390.15 ha (22.65%) in 2023, representing a net loss of 514.55 ha (−40.31%). Conversely, built-up areas expanded substantially from 84.96 ha (4.93%) to 538.65 ha (31.27%), while farmland increased from 192.24 ha (11.16%) to 376.85 ha (21.87%) over the same period. Rocky outcrops and bare land also experienced net declines, reflecting intensified land conversion pressures. Decadal analysis showed consistent increases in built-up and agricultural land at the expense of natural vegetation, indicating accelerating anthropogenic encroachment. Classification accuracy was acceptable, with overall accuracies ranging from 83.75% to 95.63%, confirming the reliability of the results. The observed LULC changes underscore the adverse impacts of unchecked urban expansion, agricultural intensification, and deforestation on wildlife habitats and biodiversity conservation in Jos Wildlife Park. The study highlights an urgent need for strengthened land-use planning, effective buffer-zone management, public awareness, and improved conservation strategies to mitigate urban pressures and ensure the long-term sustainability of this critical protected area.

Keywords : Urbanization, Vegetation Cover, Forest Change, Wildlife Park, Environments.

References :

  1. Adzandeh , E. A., Akintunde, J. A., & Akintunde, E. A. (2015). Analysis of Urban Growth Agents in Jos Metropolis, Nigeria. International Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS, 41-50.
  2. Amundson, R., Berhe, A. A., Hopmans, J., Olson, C., Sztein, E., & Sparks, D. (2015). Soil and human security in the 21st century. Science.
  3. Barbour, K.M. (1982). Human Diseases and Health Facilities In: Barbour, K.M., et al., (Eds), Nigeria in Maps. Hodder and Stoughton, London, pp: 54-55.
  4. Chaskda, A. A., and Fandip, B. (2017). Anthropogenic Footprints In The Amurum Forest Reserve And The Jos Wildlife Park, Jos Plateau State, Nigeria. Journal of Research in Forestry, Wildlife & Environment Vol. 9(4)
  5. Encyclopedia Britannica. (n.d.). Urbanization. Retrieved April 07, 2022, from Encyclopedia Britannica: https://www.britannica.com/topic/urbanization
  6. Foley, J.A., DeFries, R.S., Asner, G.P., Barford, C., Bonana, G., Carpenter, S.R., Chapin, F.S. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 80 (309): 570–574
  7. Gu, C. (2019). Urbanization: Processes and driving forces. Science China Earth Sciences volume, 1351-1360.
  8. Hoffman, T., Todd, S., Ntshona , Z., & Turner , S. (2014). Land degradation in South Africa. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.
  9. Iirmdu, T. O., Jumbo, S. E., Gontul, T. K., Ayuba, I. G., Gyang, J. G., Paul, E. M., (2013). Effects of Deforestation on the Jos Wildlife Park Ecosystems, Plateau State, Nigeria, Benin Journal of Social Sciences, 231-239.
  10. Ijeomah, H.M.; Ayodele, I.A.; Alarape, A.A. and Edet, D.I. (2005). Contributions of Jos Wildlife Park towards conservation education in Plateau State, Journal of Environmental Extension 5: 70-76.
  11. Kanianska, R. (2016). Agriculture and Its Impact on Land‐Use, Environment, and Ecosystem Services, Landscape Ecology – The Influences of Land Use and Anthropogenic Impacts of Landscape Creation, Dr. Amjad Almusaed (Ed.), InTech, DOI: 10.5772/63719. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/landscape-ecology-the-influences-of-land-useand anthropogenic-impacts-oflandscape-creation/agriculture-and-itsimpact-on-land-use environment-andecosystem-services.
  12. Kondratyeva, A., Knapp , S., Durka , W., Kühn , I., Vallet, J., Machon, N. (2020). Urbanization Effects on Biodiversity Revealed by a Two-Scale Analysis of Species Functional Uniqueness vs. Redundancy. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.
  13. McKinney, M. (2002). Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. BioScience, 883-890.
  14. McKinney, M. (2008). Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosystems, 161-176.
  15. Michalski, F., and Peres, C. A. (2005). Anthropogenic determinants of primate and carnivore local extinctions in a fragmented forest landscape of southern Amazonia. Biological Conservation, 124: 383–396.
  16. Mittermeier, R. A., Ratsimbazafy, J., Rylands, A. B., Williamson, L., Oates, J. F., Mbora, D., Ganzhorn, J. U., Rodriguez-Luna, E., Palacios, E., Heymann, E. W., Kierulff, M. C. M., Yongcheng, L., Supriatna, J., Roos, C., Walker, S., and Aguiar, J. M. (2007). Primate in peril: the World’s 25 most endangered Primates 2006-2008. Primate conservation. 22:1-40.
  17. Ojo, O., Gbuyiro, S.O., Okoloye C.U. (2004). Implications of climatic variability and climate change in West Africa. Geo.J. 61, pp 111-119.
  18. Pickett, S., & Cadenasso, M. (2009). Altered resources, disturbance, and heterogeneity: a framework for comparing urban and non-urban soils. Urban Ecosystems, 23-44.
  19. Rosenfield, G.H.; Fitzpatrick-lins, K. (1986). A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 52, 223–227.
  20. Seifolddini, F., & Mansourian, H. (2014). Spatial-Temporal Pattern of Urban Growth in Tehran Megapole. Journal of Geography and Geology.
  21. Seto, K. C., Solecki, W. D., & Griffith, C. A. (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Urbanization and Global Environmental Change. Routledge Books.

22. Wang, S.W.; Gebru, B.M.; Lamchin, M.; Kayastha, R.B.; Lee, W.-K. (2020). Land Use and Land Cover Change Detection and Prediction in the Kathmandu District of Nepal Using Remote Sensing and GIS. Sustainability, 12, 3925.

Urbanization poses a significant threat to protected ecosystems, particularly in rapidly growing cities . This study assessed the effects of urbanization on land use/land cover (LULC) dynamics and habitat integrity of Jos Wildlife Park and its environs, Plateau State, Nigeria, over a 35-year period (1988–2023). Using multi-temporal Landsat satellite imageries (TM, ETM+, and OLI/TIRS) integrated with Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques, supervised classification was employed to map and quantify changes in five major LULC classes: vegetation, built-up areas, farmland, bare land, and rocky outcrops. Ground truthing using GPS data and high-resolution imagery supported classification accuracy assessment. The results revealed pronounced urban-induced landscape transformation within and around the park. Vegetation cover declined drastically from 904.70 ha (52.51%) in 1988 to 390.15 ha (22.65%) in 2023, representing a net loss of 514.55 ha (−40.31%). Conversely, built-up areas expanded substantially from 84.96 ha (4.93%) to 538.65 ha (31.27%), while farmland increased from 192.24 ha (11.16%) to 376.85 ha (21.87%) over the same period. Rocky outcrops and bare land also experienced net declines, reflecting intensified land conversion pressures. Decadal analysis showed consistent increases in built-up and agricultural land at the expense of natural vegetation, indicating accelerating anthropogenic encroachment. Classification accuracy was acceptable, with overall accuracies ranging from 83.75% to 95.63%, confirming the reliability of the results. The observed LULC changes underscore the adverse impacts of unchecked urban expansion, agricultural intensification, and deforestation on wildlife habitats and biodiversity conservation in Jos Wildlife Park. The study highlights an urgent need for strengthened land-use planning, effective buffer-zone management, public awareness, and improved conservation strategies to mitigate urban pressures and ensure the long-term sustainability of this critical protected area.

Keywords : Urbanization, Vegetation Cover, Forest Change, Wildlife Park, Environments.

Paper Submission Last Date
28 - February - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe