⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Effects of Self -Regulated Learning Strategy and Lecture Method on Biology Students Achievement and Retention in Delta Central Senatorial District


Authors : Ovuakporaye Prevailing; Osawaru Patrick Ajaja

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 11 - November


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/26x5cuv2

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26nov106

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of self-regulated learning instructional strategy on Biology students’ achievement and retention. The independent variables were Self-regulated learning instructional strategy and lecture method, while the dependent variables were achievement and retention, with sex as an intervening variable. To achieve the purpose, seven research questions were answered and seven hypotheses were formulated and tested at 0.05 level of significance.

Keywords : Self-Regulated, Instructional strategy, Sex, Achievement and Retention.

References :

  1. Achufusi, N. N. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement among secondary school students in Anambra State. Unizik Journal of Education, 8(1), 112–124.
  2. Akudo, O., & Olise, C. (2018). Effect of self-regulated learning strategy on Chemistry students’ attitudes in Delta North Senatorial District. International Journal of Science Education, 10(4), 67–79.
  3. Anazifa, R. D., Limiansi, K., & Pratama, A. T. (2023). [Incomplete title in source document].
  4. Borg and Gall, (1979) Kuder-Richardson formula 21, appropriate for establishing the reliability of such instrument.
  5. Dutra and Reis, (2016) quasi experimental design, appropriate for any experimental research that lacks randomization of subjects.
  6. Ejigbo, M. A., & Agbo, E. O. (2024). Effects of innovative instructional strategies on students’ academic achievement in biology in secondary schools. Journal of Science Education and Practice, 12(1), 45–58.
  7. Ejigbo, M. A., & Agbo, E. O. (2024). Effects of innovative instructional strategies on students’ academic achievement in biology in secondary schools. Journal of Science Education and Practice, 12(1), 45–58.
  8. Ibe, E. N. (2025). Retention ability and academic performance of secondary school students in science subjects. International Journal of Educational Research and Development, 9(2), 112–120.
  9. Johnson and Christenson, (2000). Any  research instrument was used for the study as it is considered reliable having a reliability coefficient of 0.70 and above
  10. Mbanefo, M. C., Ozoji, E. D., & John, I. N. (2023). Influence of teaching methods on students’ achievement and interest in biology in secondary schools. Nigerian Journal of Educational Research, 18(3), 89–101.
  11. Mbanefo, M. C., Ozoji, E. D., & John, I. N. (2023). Influence of teaching methods on students’ achievement and interest in biology in secondary schools. Nigerian Journal of Educational Research, 18(3), 89–101.
  12. Ogbaga, C. C., & Osuafor, A. M. (2022). Curriculum implementation and students’ academic achievement in biology in secondary schools. African Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 33–47.
  13. Ogbaga, C. C., & Osuafor, A. M. (2022). Curriculum implementation and students’ academic achievement in biology in secondary schools. African Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 33–47.
  14. Okoye, N. S. (2015). Effects of instructional strategies on students’ retention in science subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology and Practice, 7(1), 66–74.
  15. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4
  16. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic Press.
  17. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  18. Robert, A. (2014). Introduction to biology. Oxford University Press.
  19. Robert, A (2014). Introduction to biology. Oxford University Press.
  20. Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 1–37). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of self-regulated learning instructional strategy on Biology students’ achievement and retention. The independent variables were Self-regulated learning instructional strategy and lecture method, while the dependent variables were achievement and retention, with sex as an intervening variable. To achieve the purpose, seven research questions were answered and seven hypotheses were formulated and tested at 0.05 level of significance.

Keywords : Self-Regulated, Instructional strategy, Sex, Achievement and Retention.

Paper Submission Last Date
30 - November - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe