Authors :
Edward OLADIGBOLU; Marvellous O. AKANBI; Utom Joshua CHIKADIBIA; Muneer. A. AKINBOLA; Rasak. K. BANJO; Ejiwumi Jamiu ADEWALE; Adesorin Matthew ADESOLA
Volume/Issue :
Volume 7 - 2022, Issue 8 - August
Google Scholar :
https://bit.ly/3IIfn9N
Scribd :
https://bit.ly/3UbfTnH
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7087946
Abstract :
Project delivery systems outline the
responsibilities and tasks of the parties involved in a
project. They also established a framework for how the
phases of design, procurement, and construction would be
carried out. the decision made when deciding on a project.
The delivery system of a project affects every aspect of its
execution, and it also has a big impact on how effectively the
project is completed. Such analyses ought to be sufficiently
complete to support decision-making. The generalized,
unstructured, and too simplistic approaches that
characterize subjective judgments have been proven to have
a number of disadvantages compared to processes for
organized, quantitative decision-making. Project managers
are typically obliged to base their choice of project delivery
techniques on subjective evaluations because there aren't
any quantifiable criteria for project delivery systems that
have been established and validated via research. The
establishment of the essential quantitative values for use in
a decision analysis process, which also provides a valid
justification for the selection of project delivery methods for
capital projects, would considerably increase the quality of
the decision-making process. The research findings that are
provided in this paper provide the field with the requisite
quantitative values.
Keywords :
Project Delivery Methods; Design-Bid-Build; Design-Build; Construction Management Agency And Construction Management At Risk
Project delivery systems outline the
responsibilities and tasks of the parties involved in a
project. They also established a framework for how the
phases of design, procurement, and construction would be
carried out. the decision made when deciding on a project.
The delivery system of a project affects every aspect of its
execution, and it also has a big impact on how effectively the
project is completed. Such analyses ought to be sufficiently
complete to support decision-making. The generalized,
unstructured, and too simplistic approaches that
characterize subjective judgments have been proven to have
a number of disadvantages compared to processes for
organized, quantitative decision-making. Project managers
are typically obliged to base their choice of project delivery
techniques on subjective evaluations because there aren't
any quantifiable criteria for project delivery systems that
have been established and validated via research. The
establishment of the essential quantitative values for use in
a decision analysis process, which also provides a valid
justification for the selection of project delivery methods for
capital projects, would considerably increase the quality of
the decision-making process. The research findings that are
provided in this paper provide the field with the requisite
quantitative values.
Keywords :
Project Delivery Methods; Design-Bid-Build; Design-Build; Construction Management Agency And Construction Management At Risk