⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Effectiveness of Myofascial Release with Icing Versus Ultrasound with Ischemic Compression in Patients with Upper Trapezitis: An Experimental Study


Authors : Dr. N. Siva Harish; Dr. M. N. Magesh; M. Sai Ganesh Naik

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 10 - October


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/rt69meca

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26Oct1258

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Background: Trapezitis is a painful inflammatory condition of the trapezius muscle, often associated with myofascial pain. It typically presents with muscle tightness and discomfort, leading to reduced neck mobility. The condition is most commonly observed in individuals between 18 and 50 years of age. Physiotherapeutic approaches such as myofascial release with icing and ultrasound combined with ischemic compression are frequently used to manage symptoms, but limited evidence exists comparing their effectiveness in treating upper trapezitis.  Objective: To find out the effectiveness of myofascial release with icing vs ultrasound with ischemic compression in patients with upper trapezitis.  Methods: An experimental study was conducted on a total of 30 subjects with the upper trapezitis condition present for not more than 3 months. They were taken and allocated into two groups comprising 15 subjects in each group by the lottery method, as group 1 received myofascial release (MFR) followed by icing, while group 2 received ischemic compression followed by ultrasound. Outcome measures were the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and the Universal Goniometer for measuring Range of Motion (ROM).  Duration: Total duration of four weeks, three treatment sessions per week  Results: The statistical analysis showed a significant difference between the two groups. This shows that subjects in group 1 showed a significant improvement over those in group 2.  Conclusion: The study concluded that the MFR, along with icing, is more effective in improving the neck range of motion, especially neck lateral flexion, and reducing pain in individuals with upper trapezitis.

Keywords : MFR – Myofascial Release, IC – Ischemic Compression, Upper Trapezitis, Ultrasound Therapy, Cryotherapy.

References :

  1. Travell JG, Simons DG, Simons LS. Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction: The Trigger Point Manual. Volume 1: Upper Half of the Body. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 2000.
  2. Inman VT, Saunders JB, Abbott LC. Observations on the function of the shoulder joint. 1944. Clin OrthopRelat Res. 1996 Sep;(330):3–12.
  3. Chaudhary ES, Shah N, Vyas N, Khuman R, Chavda D, Nambi G. Comparative study of myofascial release and cold pack in upper trapezius spasm. Int J Health Sci Res. 2013 Dec;3(12):20-27.
  4. Hodgson L, Fryer G. The effect of manual pressure release on myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle. Int J Osteopath Med. 2006 Mar;9(1):33-39.
  5. Bergmann TF, Peterson DH. Chiropractic technique: principles and procedures. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2011. p.88, 393. ISBN: 978-0323-049696.
  6. Shweta R. Rakholiya, Vaibhavi Ved. Effect of ischemic compression on upper trapezitis. Int J Curr Adv Res. 2016 Jul;5(7):1131-1134. ISSN: 2319-6475.
  7. Snehal Desai, Kiran Jeswani. To compare the effect of myofascial release and ischaemic compression on pain, cervical lateral flexion and function in acute trapezitis in young adults. Int J Appl Res. 2018;4(3):448-454.
  8. Singh Inderbir. Human anatomy. Vols. 1 & 3. 6th ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2016.
  9. Hanten WP, Olson SL, Butts NL, Nowicki AL. Effectiveness of a home program of ischemic pressure followed by sustained stretch for treatment of myofascial trigger points. Phys Ther. 2000 Oct;80(10):997-1003.
  10. Smith LK, Weiss EL, Lehmkuhl LD. Brunnstrom's clinical kinesiology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company; 1996.
  11. Nadler SF, Weingand K, Kruse RJ. The physiologic basis and clinical applications of cryotherapy and thermotherapy for the pain practitioner. Pain Physician. 2004 Jul;7(3):395-399.
  12. Vispute S, Kumar N. A comparative study of the immediate effects of myofascial release technique and positional release technique on trapezitis among college students. Int J Physiotherapy Res. 2022;10(3):4243-4249.
  13. Gautam H, Pal R, Khan J, Kapoor S. A comparative study to analyze the effects of myofascial release with ultrasound and exercises vs. ultrasound with stretching in patients with trapezitis. Afr J Biol Sci. 2024;6(Si3):3335-3339
  14. Ravish VN, Shridhar S, Helen S. To compare the effectiveness of myofascial release technique versus positional release technique with laser in patients with unilateral trapezitis. J Evol Med Dent Sci.2014;3(9):2161-6. doi:10.14260/jemds/2014/2121.

Background: Trapezitis is a painful inflammatory condition of the trapezius muscle, often associated with myofascial pain. It typically presents with muscle tightness and discomfort, leading to reduced neck mobility. The condition is most commonly observed in individuals between 18 and 50 years of age. Physiotherapeutic approaches such as myofascial release with icing and ultrasound combined with ischemic compression are frequently used to manage symptoms, but limited evidence exists comparing their effectiveness in treating upper trapezitis.  Objective: To find out the effectiveness of myofascial release with icing vs ultrasound with ischemic compression in patients with upper trapezitis.  Methods: An experimental study was conducted on a total of 30 subjects with the upper trapezitis condition present for not more than 3 months. They were taken and allocated into two groups comprising 15 subjects in each group by the lottery method, as group 1 received myofascial release (MFR) followed by icing, while group 2 received ischemic compression followed by ultrasound. Outcome measures were the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and the Universal Goniometer for measuring Range of Motion (ROM).  Duration: Total duration of four weeks, three treatment sessions per week  Results: The statistical analysis showed a significant difference between the two groups. This shows that subjects in group 1 showed a significant improvement over those in group 2.  Conclusion: The study concluded that the MFR, along with icing, is more effective in improving the neck range of motion, especially neck lateral flexion, and reducing pain in individuals with upper trapezitis.

Keywords : MFR – Myofascial Release, IC – Ischemic Compression, Upper Trapezitis, Ultrasound Therapy, Cryotherapy.

Paper Submission Last Date
30 - November - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe