Authors :
Nickson Jere; Dr. Mildred Muhyila
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 3 - March
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/yc4pbc3z
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4vkp4pd2
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26mar1195
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Agriculture is central to Zambia’s economy, yet small-scale farmers face persistent challenges linked to land
access, tenure insecurity, and limited policy effectiveness. This study examines the effectiveness of Zambia’s land policy in
enhancing agricultural productivity among small-scale farmers in Chipili District. Guided by Property Rights Theory, the
research assesses how land tenure security, access to land, and land administration influence investment in agriculture,
adoption of sustainable land management practices, and household livelihoods. A quantitative cross-sectional design was
employed, with data collected from 130 small-scale farmers using structured questionnaires. Descriptive and inferential
statistical analyses, including regression and Chi-square tests, were conducted using SPSS to evaluate relationships between
land policy variables and productivity outcomes. Findings indicate that secure land tenure significantly increases farmers’
likelihood to invest in soil conservation, irrigation, and improved crop management, thereby enhancing productivity.
Conversely, tenure insecurity and limited access to statutory land constrain investment and adoption of sustainable
practices. The study highlights the socio-economic and environmental implications of land policy, emphasizing the need for
context-specific reforms to strengthen tenure security, promote equitable access, and support sustainable agricultural
development. The results provide empirical evidence to inform policymakers, development partners, and local stakeholders
in designing inclusive and effective land governance frameworks.
Keywords :
Land Policy; Land Tenure Security; Agricultural Productivity.
References :
- Alchian, A.A. & Demsetz, H. (1973). The Property Right Paradigm. Journal of Economic History.
- Ali, D.A., Deininger, K. & Goldstein, M. (2014). Environmental and Gender Impacts of Land Tenure Regularization in Africa. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.
- Ali, D.A., Deininger, K. & Harris, A. (2019). Using Satellite Imagery to Assess Impacts of Land Tenure Regularization in Rwanda. World Bank Economic Review.
- Babbie, E. (2020). The Practice of Social Research. 15th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.
- Besley, T. (1995). Property Rights and Investment Incentives: Theory and Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Political Economy.
- Bezu, S. & Holden, S. (2014). Are Rural Youth in Ethiopia Abandoning Agriculture? World Development.
- Boone, C. (2019). Property and Political Order in Africa. Cambridge University Press.
- Boone, C. (2021). Land Politics and Territorial Authority in Africa. African Affairs.
- Brown, T. (2019). Land Policy Reform and Rural Development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Land Use Policy.
- Brown, C., et al. (2016). Land Governance and Sustainable Land Management: A Meta-Analysis. Global Environmental Change.
- Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. 5th ed. Oxford University Press.
- Carrilho, J. (2023). Sustainable Land Use: Policy Implications of Systematic Land Regularisation in Mozambique. Land Use Policy.
- Central Statistical Office (CSO). (2020). Agricultural Census Report. Lusaka: Government of Zambia.
- Central Statistical Office (CSO). (2022). Population and Agricultural Statistics Report. Lusaka.
- Chirwa, E. (2018). Land Policy and Rural Livelihoods in Zambia. Journal of African Development.
- Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Sage.
- Creswell, J.W. & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research Design. 5th ed. Sage.
- Deininger, K. & Binswanger, H. (1999). The Evolution of the World Bank’s Land Policy. World Bank Research Observer.
- Deininger, K. & Feder, G. (2001). Land Institutions and Land Markets. Handbook of Agricultural Economics.
- Ding, C. (2003). Land Policy Reform in China and Its Impacts. Land Use Policy.
- Djurfeldt, A., et al. (2018). Gender and Land Ownership in Africa. World Development.
- FAO. (2019). Sustainable Land Management Guidelines. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
- Feder, G. & Nishio, A. (1999). The Benefits of Land Registration and Titling. Land Use Policy.
- German, L., Schoneveld, G. & Mwangi, E. (2014). Contemporary Processes of Large-Scale Land Acquisition in Zambia. World Development.
- German, L., et al. (2017). Customary Land Governance in Zambia. Land.
- Kamal, A., et al. (2021). Land Ownership and Agricultural Productivity in Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Economics.
- Nunnally, J. & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill.
- World Bank. (2019). Zambia Land Governance Assessment Framework. Washington DC.
- World Bank. (2022). Zambia Economic Brief. Washington DC.
- ZamStats. (2022). Agricultural Production Report. Lusaka.
- Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis. Harper & Row.
Agriculture is central to Zambia’s economy, yet small-scale farmers face persistent challenges linked to land
access, tenure insecurity, and limited policy effectiveness. This study examines the effectiveness of Zambia’s land policy in
enhancing agricultural productivity among small-scale farmers in Chipili District. Guided by Property Rights Theory, the
research assesses how land tenure security, access to land, and land administration influence investment in agriculture,
adoption of sustainable land management practices, and household livelihoods. A quantitative cross-sectional design was
employed, with data collected from 130 small-scale farmers using structured questionnaires. Descriptive and inferential
statistical analyses, including regression and Chi-square tests, were conducted using SPSS to evaluate relationships between
land policy variables and productivity outcomes. Findings indicate that secure land tenure significantly increases farmers’
likelihood to invest in soil conservation, irrigation, and improved crop management, thereby enhancing productivity.
Conversely, tenure insecurity and limited access to statutory land constrain investment and adoption of sustainable
practices. The study highlights the socio-economic and environmental implications of land policy, emphasizing the need for
context-specific reforms to strengthen tenure security, promote equitable access, and support sustainable agricultural
development. The results provide empirical evidence to inform policymakers, development partners, and local stakeholders
in designing inclusive and effective land governance frameworks.
Keywords :
Land Policy; Land Tenure Security; Agricultural Productivity.