⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Effect of Vigna radiata (Mung Bean) Cropping Systems Intercropped with Rice in a Smallholder Farming Environment in Tshilenge, KasaïOriental: Integrated Assessment of Agronomic, Ecological and Phytosanitary Performance


Authors : Mutombo Tshibamba Jean Michel; Kizungu Vumilia Roger; Tshibamba Mukendi John; Tshilenge Lukanda Luc; Malumba Kamba Paul; Muyayabantu Mupala Georges

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 7 - July


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mr45zc3e

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/yk4eej8w

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul337

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Smallholder agriculture in developing countries, such as sub-Saharan Africa, represents about 80 to 90% of agricultural holdings, with an average area ranging from 0.5 to 2 hectares per household, and employs 60-70% of the active population, thus constituting the main source of employment. The present study aims to determine whether rice-Vigna radiata intercropping constitutes a sustainable and profitable alternative for family farmers. To this end, a field experiment was conducted in Tshilenge, specifically in the village of Bena-Ntanda (-6.130199, 23.432759 and 621m), using a Fisher complete randomized block design. In pure stands, mung beans (yellow and green cultivars) and rice (Nerica 4 variety) were sown at spacings of 0.20 m x 0.20 m with two seeds (mung bean) and four grains (rice) per hole, respectively. In intercropping, rice was sown one month before mung beans at spacings of 0.40 m x 0.20 m (4 grains per hole), while for Vigna radiata (yellow and green) spacings were 0.30 m x 0.20 m (2 seeds per hole). The rice-Vigna radiata cropping system represents a sustainable and profitable alternative for family farmers in smallholder farming environments. It has promoted increased vegetative growth in both mung bean and rice. Although a slight reduction in yield (13%) was observed for the two crops, the attack incidence was significantly lower in intercropping compared to pure stands. Thus, rice-Vigna radiata intercropping constitutes a simple, affordable (low-cost) agricultural practice that enables income diversification and enhances the resilience of production systems to climate change.

Keywords : Rice-Vigna radiata Cropping System, Agronomic Performances, Ecological Performances, Phytosanitary Performances, Tshilenge, Kasaï-Oriental, D.R. Congo.

References :

  1. Abudulai M., Shepard B.M., 2001. Timing insecticide sprays for control of pod-sucking bugs in cowpea in Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology, 18(1), 51-60.
  2. Alcober, E. A. L., Ratilla, M. D., Capuno, O. B., & Valenzona, J. S., 2014. Evaluation of Different Cropping Systems for Marginal Uplands in Inopacan, Leyte, in Annals of Tropical Research, 36(Supplement), 124--138. https://doi.org/10.32945/atr36s8.2014
  3. AL-Sabagh T.M.H.B., Hadi S.F., Abdul-Kadhim M.H., Qahraman D.S., 2024. Response of mung bean (Vigna Radiata L.) seed treated with gibberellin under water-stress conditions in Sabrao, in Journal of Breeding and Genetics, 56(3): 1262-1270. http://doi.org/10.54910/sabrao2024.56.3.33.
  4. Asnake B., Fassil A., 2019. Isolation, Identification and Characterization Effective Rhizobium Species Nodulating Mung Bean (Vigna radiata) from some places of North Shewa, in Int J Environ Sci Nat Res 20(1), p1-9. http://DOI: 10.19080/IJESNR.2019.20.556026.
  5. Ballaré C.L., 2014. Light regulation of plant defense in Annual Review of Plant Biology, 65, 335‑363.
  6. Bahlouli F., Bouzerzour H., Benmahammed A., 2009. Etude des mécanismes de stabilité du rendement grain de quelques génotypes de blé dur (Triticum durum desf.) sous climat semi-aride, in Annales de la Faculté des Sciences et Sciences de l'Ingénieur, Vol. 1 N° 3, p1-11
  7. Bhawana S., Sahu C., Parikh M., Ritu R.S., 2025. Genetic and Phenotypic Diversity of Elite Mung Bean (Vigna Radiata L. Wilczek) Genotypes, in Journal of Advances, Biology & Biotechnology 28 (4):246-58. https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2025/v28i42184.
  8. Beatriz A.O., 2019. Soil-plant interactions within a cereal-legume intercropping system and effects on soil functioning, PhD Thesis, GAIA Doctoral School -- Biodiversity, Agriculture, Food, Environment, Soil, Water, University of Montpellier, France p192
  9. Bedoussac L., Justes E., 2011. A comparison of commonly used indices for evaluating species interactions and intercrop efficiency: Application to durum wheat--winter pea intercrops, in Field Crops Research, 124(1), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.05.025
  10. Boetzl, F.A., Douhan S.A., Friberg H., Viketoft M., Bergkvist G., Lundin O., 2023. Undersowing oats with clovers supports pollinators and suppresses arable weeds without reducing yields, in Journal of Applied Ecology, 60, 4, 614-623. Doi. 10.1111/1365-2664.14361
  11. Bruce T.J.A., Wadhams L.J., Woodcock C.M., 2005. Insect host location: volatile situation in Trends, in Plant Science, 10(6), 269-274.
  12. Cheyrou J., 2024. Analysis of the performance of diversity of intercropping systems carried out on farms in a low-input context in South-West France. Life Sciences [q-bio]. dumas-05084916.
  13. Corre-Hellou G., Bedoussac L., Bousseau D., Chaigne G., Chataigner C., Celette F., Cohan J.P., Coutard J.P., Emile J.C., Floriotet M., 2013. Multi-service cereal-legume intercrops, in Innovations Agronomiques, 30, pp.41-57. 10.17180/w3pk-w678. hal-01173335
  14. Coulibaly K., Vall E., Autfray P., Sedogo P.M., 2012. Technico-economic performance of maize/cowpea and maize/mucuna intercrops under real farming conditions in Burkina Faso: potentials and constraints, in Tropicultura, 30, 3, p147-154
  15. Dobermann A., Fairhurst T. 2000. Rice: Nutrient management and fertilizer practices. Los Baños, Philippines, in International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), ISBN: 981-04-2742-5, p191
  16. Diatta A.A., Abaye O., Thomason W.E., Lo M., Guèye F., Baldé A.B., Tine F., Vaughan L.J., Thompson T.L., 2019. Effect of mung bean intercropping on millet yield in the Groundnut Basin, Senegal, in Innovations Agronomiques 74, p69-81.
  17. Dhima K.V., Lithourgidis A.S., Vasilakoglou I.B., Dordas C.A., 2007. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratios, in Field Crops Research, 100(2-3), 249-256
  18. Du J-b., Han T-F., Gai J-Y., Yong T-W., Sun X., Wang X-C., Yang F., Liu J, Shu K., Liu W-G., Yang W-Y., 2018. Maize-soybean strip intercropping, achieved a balance between high productivity and sustainability, in J. Integr Agric 17(4), 747-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61789-1
  19. ECHO, 2017. La sélection de légumineuses comme engrais verts/cultures de couverture; Pratiques exemplaires, fiche n°7, North Fort Myers, Florida 33917, USA, p 1 -- 18
  20. Egli DB, Bruening WP (2005) Shade and temporal distribution of pod production and pod set in soybean published with the approval of the director of the Kentucky, in Agric. Exp. Stn. as paper 04--06-147. Crop Sci 45:1764--1769. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0557
  21. Erik S.J., Mark B. P., Boddey M.R., Gresshoff M.P., Henrik H.N., Bruno J.R., Malcolm J.M., 2012. Legumes for mitigation of climate change and the provision of feedstock for biofuels and biorefineries, in Agronomy for Sustainable Development Volume 32, pages 329-364,
  22. Eshetu B.A., 2023. Mung Bean (Vigna radiata L.) Production Vis-Avis Market Potential in Ethiopia: A Review in Asian J. Biol. Sci., 16 (4): 614-622. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajbs.2023.614.622
  23. Fan Y., Chen J., Cheng Y., Raza MA., Wu X., Wang Z., Liu Q., Wang R., Wang X., Yong T., Liu W., Liu J., Du J., Shu K., Yang W., Yang F., 2018. Effect of shading and light recovery on the growth, leaf structure, and photosynthetic performance of soybean in a maize-soybean relay-strip intercropping system. PLoS ONE 13(5):e0198159. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198159
  24. Fageria N.K., 2007. Soil fertility and plant nutrition research under field conditions: Basic principles and methodology, in Journal of Plant Nutrition, 30(2), 203--223.
  25. FAO, 2016. Les légumineuses et la biodiversité, Nutrition-Sécurité Alimentaire- Santé-Changement Climatique- Biodiversité, Rome, Italie, 2p
  26. Fontaine L., Coulombel A., Belleil A., 2013. Cereal/legume intercrops: undeniable agronomic assets, in AlterAgri, p8-17.
  27. Franklin K.A., 2008. Shade avoidance, in New Phytologist, 179(4), 930‑944.
  28. Guinet M., Nicolardot B., Durey V., Revellin C., Lombard F., Pimet E., Bizouard F., Voisin A.S., 2019. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and preceding crop effect: are all grain legumes equal? in Innovations Agronomiques, 74, pp.55-68. 10.15454/jj5qvv. hal-02158172.
  29. Haya B.A., Sulaiman Z., Ramlan M.F., Ariffin M.R., Yusoff M.M., Tsan F.Y., Kalam, M.A., Karim K.N., Zaheid M.I.I., 2025. Optimizing sweet corn and groundnut intercropping: A comparative analysis of yield and economic outcomes, in Journal of Academia, 13(2), 224-237. https://doi.org/10.24191/joa.v13i2.6400
  30. Hossain M.A., Hasan M.A., Sikder S., Chowdhury A. K. M. M. B., Sarker M.S., 2017. Physiological Traits And Yield Performance of Mungbean (Vigna Radiata (L) Wilczek) as Influenced By Light Intensities, in Bangladesh Agron. J., 20(2): 67-74
  31. Hinsinger P., 2012. Cereal/Legume Intercropping in Low-Input Agriculture in Southern France, PerfCom, 28p
  32. Jahn G.C., Domingo I., Almazan, M.L.P., Pacia, J.B., 2004. Effect of rice bug Leptocorisa oratorius (Hemiptera: Alydidae) on rice yield, grain quality, and seed viability, in Journal of Economic Entomology, 97(6), 1923-1927
  33. Jiao Y., Zhang Q., Miao F., 2024. Forage yield, competition, and economic indices of oat and common vetch intercrops in a semi-arid region, in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1385296
  34. Kanfany G., Diatta A.A., Nndiaye M., Bakhayokho M., Bassene C., Diop L., Manga A.G.B., Abaye O., 2025. Agro-morphological evaluation of a mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) collection under Senegalese growing conditions, in Innovations Agronomiques, 99, pp.147-152. 10.17180/ciag-2025-vol99-art12. hal-04927987.
  35. Kimou S.H., Koné T., Coulibaly N.D., Koné M., 2023. Efficacité de l'association maïs [Zea mays (L.) (Poaceae)] et niébé [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp (Fabaceae)] sur la fertilité chimique du sol au Sud de la Côte d'Ivoire, in Journal of Applied Biosciences 191: 20286 - 20294. ISSN 1997-5902. https://doi.org/10.35759/JABs.191.9
  36. Kouame N., Kouassi N.J., Ayolie K., Yao K.B., Yatty K.J., 2020. Influence of intercropping on the nodulation capacity of three legume species: Peanut, Cowpea and Green Soybean, in Journal of Applied Biosciences 145: 14930-14937 (doi.org/10.35759/JABs.v145.8).
  37. Kouassi N.J., Kouame N., Ayolie K., Yao J.K., Yatty K.J., 2019. Influence of fertilization on the nodulation capacity of two legume species, Vigna radiata L.Wilczek and Vigna unguiculata L.Walp (Fabaceae), in Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 13(7): p3079-3086 (doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v13i7.9)
  38. Kwatcho K.S., Diane D.L., Baudouin N.B.C., Tejedor J., Butterbach-B.K., Mariana C.R., Sonwa D.J., Verchot V.L., Dannenmann M., 2026. Intercropping with legumes in the Congo Basin increases maize yields but not greenhouse gas emissions in npj Sustain. Agric. 4, 38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-026-00146-9
  39. Lyu X., Mu R., Liu B., 2023. Shade avoidance syndrome in soybean and ideotype toward shade tolerance, Volume 43, 31, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-023-01375-3
  40. Mao R., Zeng D.H., 2009. Research advances in plant competition in agroforestry systems (synthèse sur la compétition aérienne et racinaire), in Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 17(2): 379-386
  41. Mathu S., Herrmann L., Pypers P., Matiru V., Mwirichia R., Lesueur D., 2012. Potential of indigenous bradyrhizobia versus commercial inoculants to improve cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. walp.) and green gram (Vigna radiata L. wilczek.) yields in Kenya in Soil, in Science and Plant Nutrition, 58 (6): 760-763. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2012.741041
  42. Matthews L., Strauss A.J., Reinsch T., Hendrik P.J.S., Taube F., Kluss C., Swanepoel A.P., 2025. Legumes and livestock in no-till crop rotations: Effects on nitrous oxide emissions, carbon sequestration, yield, and wheat protein content, in Agricultural Systems, 224, 104218, DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104218
  43. Matsumoto S., Tsuboi T., Asea G., Maruyama1 A., Kikuchi1 M., Takagaki1 M., 2014. Water Response of Upland Rice Varieties Adopted in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Water Application Experiment, in J Rice Res, Volume 2, Issue 1, 1-6 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/jrr.1000121
  44. Mesmin X. 2018. Natural regulation of insect pests in vegetable crops and its consequences on production: quantification of the service provided and search for levers for its intensification, Animal Biology, Agrocampus Ouest, France. 270p. NNT: 2018NSARC134. tel-01892160.
  45. Mischler P., 2011. Vers des Systèmes de Culture Intégrés, 6 années de réduction d'intrants réussies en Picardie, basées sur de l'agronomie, INRA, Chambres d'Agriculture de Picardie et Instituts Techniques, 43p.
  46. Mohoric L.A., 2025. Analysis of the performance of a diversity of cereal/legume intercrops for human consumption and focus on the chickpea species in its varietal diversity and intercropping practices, in Agronomy. p89. dumas-05471786.
  47. Muhammad A., Sajjad A., Ghulam A.S., Rab N., Shaukat A., 2020. Growth and yield performance of Vigna radiata (L.) R.Wilczek influenced by altitude, nitrogen dose, planting pattern and time of sowing under sole and intercropping with maize, in Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ., 24(3), p142-155.
  48. Muyayabantu G.M., Kadiata B.D., Nkongolo K.K., 2013. Assessing the Effects of Integrated Soil Fertility Management on Biological Efficiency and Economic Advantages of Intercropped Maize (Zea Mays L.) and Soybean (Glycine Max L.) in DR Congo in American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 3(3): p520-541.
  49. Muyayabantu G. Mupala., Kadiata J-B Dikand BaKach et Kabwe K.C Nkongolo. 2024: Évaluation des effets de la gestion intégrée de fertilité des sols sur l'efficacité biologique et les avantages économiques des cultures de maïs (Zea mays L.) en association avec le soja (Glycine Max L.) en RD Congo. In Kabwe K.C Nkongolo 2024. Promotion Paysanne Et Sélection Participative Décentralisée Pour Lutter Contre La Malnutrition En Rd-Congo. « Apports de variétés de maïs à haute teneur en protéines de qualité et de Légumineuses Adaptées au conditions locales ». (ISBN 978-0-9867757-2-7), Sudbury, Ontario, Canada, pp. 211-235 (Chapitre 13).
  50. Muyayabantu Mupala Georges 2017: « La Culture Du Maïs Sur Les Oxisols En Republique Democratique Du Congo ». Collection Notes des Cours. L'Harmattan, Paris, ISBN: 978-2-343-11074-5, 248 p.
  51. Namdiar M., Mahmood S., 2013. Evaluation of grain yield and yield components in intercropping of dwarf and tall cultivars of soybean (Glycine max L.), in Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1-20
  52. Niyibizi G.P., 2020. Plant associations for pest control: from a synthesis of theoretical approaches to practical application, DEA, Liège University Gembloux, Agro-Bio Tech, Belgium, p69.
  53. Nolot J.M., 2002. Systèmes de grande culture Intégrés, principes et outils de conception, conduite et évaluation, Courrier de l'environnement de l'INRA n°47, 15-26
  54. Nwagwu F.A., Umunnakwe O.C., Ojikpong T.O., Omadewu L.I., Awelewa E.A., 2023. Production returns of cassava-turmeric inter-cropping system in Calabar, Southern Nigeria, in Global Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 22(1), 63-70.
  55. Onzo A., Seidou S.M., Zoumarou-Wallis N., Datinon D.B., Tamó M., 2016. Effects of intercropping on the population dynamics of major insect pests and seed production of Jatropha curcas L. in Southern Benin, in Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 10(3): p993-1006.
  56. Pelzer E., Bedoussac L., Corre-Hellou G., Jeuffroy Ma.H., Métivier T., Naudinal C., 2014. Annual crop associations combining a legume and a cereal: farmer feedback and analysis in Innovations Agronomiques, 40, pp.73-91. 10.17180/83mt-jz86. hal-01173338.
  57. Pickett J.A., Khan Z.R., 2016. Plant volatile-mediated signalling and its application in agriculture in Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 32, 138-144.
  58. Pongi K.G., 2021. Study and modeling of the productivity of cropping systems based on direct seeding under plant cover in the savannah of southwestern Democratic Republic of Congo, PhD Thesis, National Pedagogical University, Kinshasa, p203
  59. Poorter H., Nagel O., 2000. The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review, in Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 27(6), 595-607.
  60. Pourcelot M., Pasquet G.Py.M., Schneider A., 2014. Systèmes de cultures avec légumineuses, des atouts observés en exploitations agricoles, perspectives agricoles, n°414, p 31 -- 35
  61. Raboin L.M., Batieno B.J., Gozé Eric., Douzet J.M., Poda L., Koala W.A., Agbevohia K.A., Hassami D., Kabore M., Adam Myriam., Dusserre J., Kabore R., 2023. Mung bean, Vigna radiata (L.), an alternative to sorghum-cowpea intercropping for crop diversification under Sudano-Sahelian conditions? in Cah. Agric., 32, 26, p1-11 (doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2023019)
  62. Reau R., Monnot L.A., Schaub A., Munier-Jolain N., Pambou I., Bockstaller C., Cariolle M., Chabert A., Dumans P., 2012. Les ateliers de conception de systèmes de culture pour construire, évaluer et identifier des prototypes prometteurs, Innovations Agronomiques 20 (2012), 5-33
  63. Said M.A., 2021. The effect of intercropping on olive tree pests (Case of the wilaya of Tlemcen), Master's Thesis, University Aboubekr Belkaid -- Tlemcen, Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences, and Earth and Universe Sciences, Department of Agronomy, People's Democratic Republic of Algeria, 85p.
  64. Schneider A., 2017. Les légumineuses pour des systèmes agricoles et alimentaires durables, in Terres Inova, COMIFER, 24p
  65. Schneider A., Huyghe C., 2015. Les légumineuses pour des systèmes agricoles et alimentaires durables, Éd. Quæ, Canada, 515p
  66. Srivastava R.K., Yetgin Ali., Srivastava S., 2025. The role of legume roots in carbon sequestration, soil health enhancement, and salinity mitigation under climate change: A comprehensive review, in Soil and Tillage Research, 253, 106656, 10.1016/j.still.2025.106656
  67. Stubbs L.R., Singh S., Wysocki D., Heineck G.C., Neely Haly L., Singh S., 2025. Improving sustainability of inland Pacific Northwest dryland agriculture systems with pea-canola intercropping: a review, in Food Systems, Volume 9, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1639908
  68. Tadewos T., Ayalew T., Yoseph T., 2022. Growth, nodulation and yield of mung bean (Vigna Radiata L. (Wilczek)) as affected by bio-chemical fertilizers integration at Southern Ethiopia, in Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 12(11), p39-49, doi: 10.15421/2022_412.
  69. Tonfack, L.B., Rajpoot S.K., Njira K., 2025. Integration of legume intercropping into sustainable farming systems for nitrogen fixation, soil health, and climate resilience, in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9, Doi. 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1651949
  70. Valladares F., Niinemets Ü., 2008. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences in Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39, 237‑257.
  71. Vericel G., Dubois S., Duval R., Flenet F., Fontaine L., Fourrié L., Leclerc B., Justes E., Mary B., Massad R.S., 2018. Impact de l'introduction des légumineuses dans les systèmes de culture sur les émissions de protoxyde d'azote, 63, pp.1-19.
  72. Vericel G., Minette S., 2010. Légumineuses, comment les utiliser comme cultures intermédiaires?, Mieux gérer l'interculture pour un bénéfice agronomique et environnemental, Chambre Régionale d'Agriculture sur la gestion de l'interculture et présentation des références régionales, Agropole ‐ Route de Chauvigny, 20p
  73. Waligora C., Tetu T., 2008. Légumineuses, il est urgent de les réhabiliter, Techniques Culturales Simplifiées. n°48, p12 -- 22
  74. Wangiyana W., Karlina V., Ernawati N.M.L., 2022. Increasing crop diversity and yield of black rice through intercropping with mungbean at different row proportions on raised-beds in Earth and Environmental Science 1107, 012012, 1 -- 6. https://doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1107/1/012012
  75. Wondimkun D., 2023. Mung Bean (Vigna radiata L.) Production Status and Challenges in Ethiopia, in Global Academic Journal of Agriculture and Bio sciences, Vol-5, Iss- 2 pp- 13-22. (DOI: 10.36348/gajab.2023.v05i02.002).
  76. Yahuza, I., 2011. Review of some methods of calculating intercrop efficiencies with particular reference to the estimates of intercrop benefits in wheat-faba bean system, in International Journal of Biosciences, 1(5).
  77. Yang Lu., Zhang J. Zhou G., Chang D., Chai Q., Cao W., 2024. Maize and legume intercropping enhanced crop growth and soil carbon and nutrient cycling through regulating soil enzyme activities in European Journal of Agronomy, 159, 127237, 10.1016/j.eja.2024.127237
  78. Yogesh K., Rajhans V., Kuldeep S., Oma S.B., Rajesh., 2024. Nodulation, Yield Attributes and Yield of Mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.)) Influenced by Different Level of Potassium Humate and Fertility Levels, in International Journal, Volume 47 Issue 8: p1348-1353

Smallholder agriculture in developing countries, such as sub-Saharan Africa, represents about 80 to 90% of agricultural holdings, with an average area ranging from 0.5 to 2 hectares per household, and employs 60-70% of the active population, thus constituting the main source of employment. The present study aims to determine whether rice-Vigna radiata intercropping constitutes a sustainable and profitable alternative for family farmers. To this end, a field experiment was conducted in Tshilenge, specifically in the village of Bena-Ntanda (-6.130199, 23.432759 and 621m), using a Fisher complete randomized block design. In pure stands, mung beans (yellow and green cultivars) and rice (Nerica 4 variety) were sown at spacings of 0.20 m x 0.20 m with two seeds (mung bean) and four grains (rice) per hole, respectively. In intercropping, rice was sown one month before mung beans at spacings of 0.40 m x 0.20 m (4 grains per hole), while for Vigna radiata (yellow and green) spacings were 0.30 m x 0.20 m (2 seeds per hole). The rice-Vigna radiata cropping system represents a sustainable and profitable alternative for family farmers in smallholder farming environments. It has promoted increased vegetative growth in both mung bean and rice. Although a slight reduction in yield (13%) was observed for the two crops, the attack incidence was significantly lower in intercropping compared to pure stands. Thus, rice-Vigna radiata intercropping constitutes a simple, affordable (low-cost) agricultural practice that enables income diversification and enhances the resilience of production systems to climate change.

Keywords : Rice-Vigna radiata Cropping System, Agronomic Performances, Ecological Performances, Phytosanitary Performances, Tshilenge, Kasaï-Oriental, D.R. Congo.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - August - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe