Authors :
Dr. Komal Agrawal; Aditya Rathod; Dr. Rutwa Pandya; Dr. Pallavi Chopade; Dr. Pallavi Manathkar; Dr. Sana Ahmad
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 6 - June
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/298vxh5d
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jun609
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Title:
Effect of Muscle Energy Technique Versus Active Release Technique on Hip Flexibility, Arm Muscular Power, and
Lob Shot Proficiency in Badminton Players
Background:
Badminton demands high levels of flexibility, strength, and technical skill. Muscle tightness, especially in the hip and
upper body, often hinders athletic performance. Muscle Energy Technique (MET) and Active Release Technique (ART) are
commonly used to improve muscle flexibility and strength, but limited evidence compares their efficacy in badminton
performance.
Objective:
To compare the effectiveness of MET and ART on hip flexibility, arm muscular power, and lob shot proficiency in
recreational badminton players.
Methodology:
A comparative study involving 40 participants aged 18–30 years was conducted at Dr. D. Y. Patil College of
Physiotherapy. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: Group A received MET with conventional
physiotherapy, and Group B received ART with conventional physiotherapy. Interventions were administered over two
weeks. Outcome measures included the Sit and Reach Test, Popliteal Angle Test, and Seated Single Arm Shot Put Test.
Expected Outcomes:
Both MET and ART are anticipated to enhance hip flexibility and arm power. This study aims to identify which
technique produces more significant improvements, thereby contributing to optimal treatment strategies for badminton
players.
Conclusion:
The study will provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of MET and ART, guiding physiotherapists and
coaches in enhancing performance and preventing injuries in badminton athletes.
References :
- Stepper B, Hecksteden A, Stagge H, Faude O, Donath L. Systematic review on badminton injuries: incidence, characteristics and risk factors. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med [Internet]. 2025 Jan 2 [cited 2025 Jan 27];11(1). Available from: https://bmjopensem.bmj.com/content/11/1/e002127
- The most common injuries in badminton [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jan 27]. Available from: https://fittoplay.org/sports/badminton/the-most-common-injuries-in-badminton/
- Sheth R, Rizvi SRA. The Immediate Effect of Muscle Energy Technique Versus Active Release Technique on Hamstring Tightness in Footballers. Int J Sci Healthc Res. 2022;7(2):282–94.
- Physiopedia [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jan 27]. Muscle Energy Technique. Available from: https://www.physio-pedia.com/Muscle_Energy_Technique
- Physiopedia [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jan 28]. Active Release Techniques. Available from: https://www.physio-pedia.com/Active_Release_Techniques
- Wong, P. L., et al. (2013). The biomechanics of the badminton lob shot: A comparison with other overhead strokes. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 12(3), 586-595.
- Lees, A., van den Tillaar, R., & Kennis, W. (2010). Biomechanics of the badminton smash: A review. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 5(3), 421-432.
- Edmizal E, Barlian E, Sin TH, Ahmed MA, Nugraha R, Okilanda A, Putra JA, Haryanto J. Exploring the interplay: Hand muscular power, hip flexibility, and lob shot proficiency in badminton. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2023 Dec 1;23(12):3318-24.
- Akbari M, Mistar J, Ismail R, Ismail R. Correlation between arm muscle power and badminton smash skill. ACTIVE: Journal of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation. 2021 Feb 28;10(1):16-20.
- Behera D, Vishwanath S. Comparative study on the effectiveness of muscle energy technique and active release technique on the glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) in young throwing athletes. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science. 2023 Apr 22;9(6).
- Moore SD, Laudner KG, Mcloda TA, Shaffer MA. The immediate effects of muscle energy technique on posterior shoulder tightness: a randomized controlled trial. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2011 Jun; 41(6):400-7.
Title:
Effect of Muscle Energy Technique Versus Active Release Technique on Hip Flexibility, Arm Muscular Power, and
Lob Shot Proficiency in Badminton Players
Background:
Badminton demands high levels of flexibility, strength, and technical skill. Muscle tightness, especially in the hip and
upper body, often hinders athletic performance. Muscle Energy Technique (MET) and Active Release Technique (ART) are
commonly used to improve muscle flexibility and strength, but limited evidence compares their efficacy in badminton
performance.
Objective:
To compare the effectiveness of MET and ART on hip flexibility, arm muscular power, and lob shot proficiency in
recreational badminton players.
Methodology:
A comparative study involving 40 participants aged 18–30 years was conducted at Dr. D. Y. Patil College of
Physiotherapy. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: Group A received MET with conventional
physiotherapy, and Group B received ART with conventional physiotherapy. Interventions were administered over two
weeks. Outcome measures included the Sit and Reach Test, Popliteal Angle Test, and Seated Single Arm Shot Put Test.
Expected Outcomes:
Both MET and ART are anticipated to enhance hip flexibility and arm power. This study aims to identify which
technique produces more significant improvements, thereby contributing to optimal treatment strategies for badminton
players.
Conclusion:
The study will provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of MET and ART, guiding physiotherapists and
coaches in enhancing performance and preventing injuries in badminton athletes.