Authors :
Vo Thi Thu Hong; Nguyen Vo Minh Hieu
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 8 - August
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/yvwjr9k9
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26aug348
Note : A published paper may take 4-5
working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and
ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Digital transformation has changed both the skill requirements and the employment relationship in banking, yet
evidence on how organizations can develop Generation Z employees remains fragmented. This study examines six organizational
predictors of Generation Z human resource development (HRD) in Vietnamese digital banking: digital leadership, digital
learning, the digital work environment, employee experience, innovation culture, and career development opportunities. Human
Capital Theory, the Ability–Motivation–Opportunity framework, and Social Exchange Theory provide the integrated
theoretical foundation. A quantitative-dominant, cross-sectional design was used. Following contextual review by seven
practitioners, survey data were obtained from 350 Generation Z employees at a Vietnamese commercial bank and analyzed in
SPSS 26 using reliability analysis, exploratory factor analysis, correlation analysis, ordinary least squares regression, and
demographic group comparisons.
Keywords :
Generation Z; Human Resource Development; Digital Leadership; Digital Learning; Employee Experience; Digital Banking; Vietnam.
References :
- Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press.
- Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Baker, B. (2014). E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 105–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.003
- Bailey, T. (1993). Discretionary effort and the organization of work: Employee participation and work reform since Hawthorne. Teachers College and Conservation of Human Resources, Columbia University.
- Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1964)
- Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
- Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.528
- Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., & Zampieri, R. (2019). The role of leadership in a digitalized world: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1938. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01938
- Greenhaus, J. H., Callanan, G. A., & Godshalk, V. M. (2010). Career management (4th ed.). SAGE.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
- Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355
- Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
- Martins, E. C., & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060310456337
- Morgan, J. (2017). The employee experience advantage. Wiley.
- Noe, R. A. (2020). Employee training and development (8th ed.). McGraw Hill.
- Rudolph, C. W., Rauvola, R. S., & Zacher, H. (2021). Generations and generational differences: Debunking myths in organizational science and practice and paving new paths forward. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36, 945–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09715-2
- Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
- Schein, E. H., & Schein, P. A. (2021). Organizational culture and leadership (6th ed.). Wiley.
- Schroth, H. (2019). Are you ready for Gen Z in the workplace? California Management Review, 61(3), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619841006
- Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
- Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
Digital transformation has changed both the skill requirements and the employment relationship in banking, yet
evidence on how organizations can develop Generation Z employees remains fragmented. This study examines six organizational
predictors of Generation Z human resource development (HRD) in Vietnamese digital banking: digital leadership, digital
learning, the digital work environment, employee experience, innovation culture, and career development opportunities. Human
Capital Theory, the Ability–Motivation–Opportunity framework, and Social Exchange Theory provide the integrated
theoretical foundation. A quantitative-dominant, cross-sectional design was used. Following contextual review by seven
practitioners, survey data were obtained from 350 Generation Z employees at a Vietnamese commercial bank and analyzed in
SPSS 26 using reliability analysis, exploratory factor analysis, correlation analysis, ordinary least squares regression, and
demographic group comparisons.
Keywords :
Generation Z; Human Resource Development; Digital Leadership; Digital Learning; Employee Experience; Digital Banking; Vietnam.