Disaster Management Policies and Practices in Vulnerable Communities of Nepal: A Qualitative Analysis


Authors : Kshitiz Gautam

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 11 - November


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3jhpvzjm

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2pepa2wx

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24NOV722

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study uses qualitative methods to assess the effectiveness of Nepal's National Policy for Disaster Risk Reduction (2018) in the Sankhu area, a community particularly vulnerable to natural disasters. Focusing on the Shankharapur Municipality in the Kathmandu Valley, the examines the policy's impact on marginalized communities in the aftermath of the devastating 2015 earthquake. Comprehensive interviews were conducted with 30 participants, including earthquake survivors, local government officials, and community leaders. The analysis of these interviews revealed significant barriers to the policy's implementation. Notably, a lack of collaboration among various stakeholders involved in disaster management has hindered effective response and recovery efforts. The existing policy framework also fails to sufficiently address the unique needs of disadvantaged populations, potentially increasing their vulnerability during disasters. Moreover, the study identified that the rigidity of the current policy framework limits its adaptability to evolving disaster scenarios, further diminishing its effectiveness against future threats. Additionally, the findings indicate that inadequate community engagement strategies have weakened disaster preparedness and response mechanisms, ultimately limiting the overall impact of the policy. The study underscores the need for policy reforms that enhance Nepal's capacity to withstand natural disasters by addressing these critical areas for improvement.

Keywords : Disasters, Awareness, Earthquake, Policy, Effectiveness, Implementation, Vulnerable Communities.

References :

  1. Birkmann, J. (2006). Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and definitions. In B. Wisner, P. Blaikie, T. Cannon, & I. Davis (Eds.), At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability, and Disasters (pp. 181-199). Routledge.
  2. Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (2014). At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters. Routledge.
  3. Cutter, S. L. (2016). The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA. Natural Hazards, 80(2), 741-758.
  4. Cutter, S. L. (2018). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. In International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment and Technology (pp. 1-8). John Wiley & Sons.
  5. Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242-261.
  6. Cutter, S. L., Emrich, C. T., Webb, J. J., & Morath, D. (2008). Social vulnerability to climate variability hazards: A review of the literature. Final Project Report to Oxfam America. Columbia: University of South Carolina.
  7. Dahal, R. K. (2015). Assessing Earthquake Disaster Preparedness in Nepal: The Case of Kathmandu Valley. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 13, 259-264.
  8. Dixit, A. M., Shekhar, S., & Assavalapsakul, T. (2007). Landslide hazard and risk assessment mapping for mountainous terrains: A case study from the Nepal Himalaya. Landslides, 4(4), 343-352.
  9. Eriksen, S. (2010). Climate change and society: Lessons from the social sciences. Climate Change, 100(1), 21-27.
  10. Fothergill, A., & Peek, L. A. (2004). Poverty and disasters in the United States: A review of recent sociological findings. Natural Hazards, 32(1), 89-110.
  11. Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2002). Implementing Public Policy: Governance in Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.
  12. Johnson, A. R., & Brown, C. D. (2019). Exploring social vulnerability: A study of disaster risk reduction in vulnerable communities. Journal of Risk Research, 22(5), 611-626.
  13. KC, J. K., Fitzgerald, G., & Chhetri, M. B. P. (2019). Health risks and challenges in earthquake responders in Nepal: A qualitative research. Pre Hospital and disaster medicine, 34(3), 274-281.
  14. Lee, S., Smith, R. D., Brown, B., & Jones, M. (2020). Policy implementation in disaster management: A case study analysis. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 310-318.
  15. Li, F., Yigitcanlar, T., Nepal, M., Thanh, K. N., & Dur, F. (2022). Understanding Urban Heat Vulnerability Assessment Methods: A PRISMA Review. Energies, 15(19), 6998.
  16. Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1981). Implementation and public policy. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
  17. Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA) and UNDP (2018) MoHA, National Policy for Disaster Risk Reduction. http://drrportal.gov.np/uploads/document/1476.pdf.
  18. Narayan, G., Kumar, S. R., & Furze, J. N. (2022). Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Policy in Nepal: A Centralized-Decentralized Dichotomy. In Earth Systems Protection and Sustainability: Volume 1 (pp. 227-249). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  19. O'Toole Jr, L. J. (2000). Research on policy implementation: Assessment and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 263-288.
  20. Pangali Sharma, T. P., Zhang, J., Khanal, N. R., Nepal, P., B. P., Nanzad, L., & Gautam, Y. (2022). Household vulnerability to flood disasters among Tharu community, western Nepal. Sustainability, 14(19), 12386.
  21. Poudel, S. (2018). Disaster Vulnerability of Urban Informal Settlements in Nepal: A Case Study of Pokhara. Journal of Geography and Natural Disasters, 8(2), 1-5.
  22. Quarantelli, E. L. (1997). Ten criteria for evaluating the management of community disasters.  Disasters, 21(1), 39-56.
  23. Rieger, K. (2021). Multi-hazards, displaced people's vulnerability and resettlement: Post- earthquake experiences from Rasuwa district in Nepal and their connections to policy loopholes and reconstruction practices. Progress in Disaster Science, 11, 100187.
  24. Shrestha, M. S., Gurung, M. B., Khadgi, V. R., Wagle, N., Banarjee, S., Sherchan, U., & Mishra, A. (2021). The last mile: Flood risk communication for better preparedness in Nepal. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 56, 102118.
  25. Smith, J. A. (2018). Concepts and their importance in scholarly research. Journal of Scholarly Research, 41(3), 467-482.
  26. Vij, S., Russell, C., Clark, J., Parajuli, B. P., Shakya, P., & Dewulf, A. (2020). Evolving disaster governance paradigms in Nepal. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50, 101911.
  27. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters. Routledge.

This study uses qualitative methods to assess the effectiveness of Nepal's National Policy for Disaster Risk Reduction (2018) in the Sankhu area, a community particularly vulnerable to natural disasters. Focusing on the Shankharapur Municipality in the Kathmandu Valley, the examines the policy's impact on marginalized communities in the aftermath of the devastating 2015 earthquake. Comprehensive interviews were conducted with 30 participants, including earthquake survivors, local government officials, and community leaders. The analysis of these interviews revealed significant barriers to the policy's implementation. Notably, a lack of collaboration among various stakeholders involved in disaster management has hindered effective response and recovery efforts. The existing policy framework also fails to sufficiently address the unique needs of disadvantaged populations, potentially increasing their vulnerability during disasters. Moreover, the study identified that the rigidity of the current policy framework limits its adaptability to evolving disaster scenarios, further diminishing its effectiveness against future threats. Additionally, the findings indicate that inadequate community engagement strategies have weakened disaster preparedness and response mechanisms, ultimately limiting the overall impact of the policy. The study underscores the need for policy reforms that enhance Nepal's capacity to withstand natural disasters by addressing these critical areas for improvement.

Keywords : Disasters, Awareness, Earthquake, Policy, Effectiveness, Implementation, Vulnerable Communities.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe