Authors : Sujay Rao Mandavilli

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 3 - March

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/y8pm47fb

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/8tsujz26

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar1459

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.

Abstract : The core objective of this paper is to develop guidelines for developing criteria also known as smoking gun tests for ascertaining and measuring objectivity, accuracy, precision, and rigour in scholarship. We naturally begin this paper by attempting to define what research and scientific method are, and then correlate them with other concepts in this paper such as objectivity, objectivity in mindset, certainty, precision, exactitude, and limits to objectivity. We also then vet and ratify our concepts with the concepts proposed in our earlier papers on scientific method over the years, and other general scientific concepts and methods too. The twin concepts of discourse analysis and content analysis are also reviewed in detail, and we propose a four stage model and approach in this paper, namely the execution of discourse analysis and content analysis, the identification and categorization of fallacies including new ones as a part of a continuous process of identification and categorization, and the creation of objective criteria and smoking gun tests to align with these fallacies. Some examples are provided in support of the above method, though tests can only be continuously developed and added upon as a part of an elaborate and a protracted and continuous process. We hope, expect, and anticipate that this will become an important part and parcel of twenty-first century scientific method, with rich rewards in store for myriad facets of scientific activity.

References :

1. Groh, Arnold (2018). Research Methods in Indigenous Contexts. New York: Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-72774-5
2. Cohen, N.; Arieli, T. (2011). "Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and snowball sampling". Journal of Peace Research. 48 (4): 423–436
3. Talja, Sanna and Pamela J. Mckenzie (2007). Editor's Introduction: Special Issue on Discursive Approaches to Information Seeking in Context, The University of Chicago Press
4. Bauer, Henry H., Scientific Literacy and the Myth of the Scientific Method, University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL, 1992
5. Crombie, A.C. (1953), Robert Grosseteste and the Origins of Experimental Science 1100–1700, Oxford: Clarendon
6. Unveiling the Sociological Ninety-ten rules for Social Sciences research: Towards better hypothesis formulation in the Social Sciences in the interests of higher quality research and intellectual multi-polarity Sujay Rao Mandavilli Published in IJISRT, February 2023
7. Elucidating the Certainty uncertainty principle for the Social Sciences: Guidelines for hypothesis formulation in the Social Sciences for enhanced objectivity and intellectual multi-polarity Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, March 2023
8. Operationalizing cross-cultural research design: Practical, cost-effective, and a minimalistic application of cross-cultural research design to minimize cultural bias in research and reconcile diverse viewpoints IJISRT, April 2023 Sujay Rao Mandavilli
9. Making the use of Inductive approaches, Nomothetic theorybuilding and the application of Grounded theory widespread in the social sciences: A guide to better research and theorization in the social sciences Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT May 2023
10. Copi, I.M.; Cohen, C.; Flage, D.E. (2006). Essentials of Logic (Second ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education
11. Newton, Issac (1999) [1726 (3rd ed.)]. Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica [Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy]. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy
12. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches, John W. Creswell, Sage publications, fourth edition, 2014
13. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES Dr. Prabhat Pandey Dr. Meenu Mishra Pandey © Bridge Center, 2015
14. Rao, C.R., Mitra, S.K. and Matthai, A. (1966) : Formulae and Tables for Statistical Work, Statistical Publishing Society, Kolkota – 700108
15. Sampath, S. (2005) : Sampling Theory & Methods, Second Edition, Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, Chennai, Mumbai, Kolkata
16. Singh, Kultar (2007) : Quantitative Social Research Methods, Sage Publications (Pvt.) Limited, New Delhi
17. Singleton Jr., Royce A. & Straits, Bruce C. (2005) : Approaches to Social Research, 4th Edition, Oxford University Press, New York – Oxford
18. Advocating output criteria based scientific and research methodologies: Why the reliability of scientific and research methods must be measured based on output criteria and attributes Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, August 2023
19. Dallmayr, Winfried Reinhard. Twilight of Subjectivity: Contributions to a Post-Individualist Theory Politics. Amherst, MA:[University of Massachusetts Press, 1981
20. Farrell, Frank B. Subjectivity, Realism, and Postmodernism: The Recovery of the World in Recent Philosophy. Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994
21. Lauer, Quentin. The Triumph of Subjectivity: An Introduction to Transcendental Phenomenology. Fordham University Press, 1958
22. Geroulanos, Stefanos, and Todd Meyers, "Georges Canguilhem’s Critique of Medical Reason", in Georges Canguilhem, Writings on Medicine (Fordham University Press, 2012), 1-24
23. Gutting, Gary, "Canguilhem's history of science" in Michel Foucault's Archaeology of Scientific Reason: Science and the History of Reason (Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 32–52
24. Instituting “Institutional coherentism” as a prerequisite for high-quality science: Another crucial step for winning the battle for consistent high-quality science Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, February 2024
25. Baking innovative and creative thinking techniques into scientific method: Towards innovative and creative techniques as an intrinsic part of scientific method for higher scientific and research output Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT January 2024
26. Towards a formal analysis of “vested interests” as an intrinsic part of social science research techniques: Another crucial component of social and cultural progress Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, September 2024
27. Acocella, N. and Di Bartolomeo, G. and Piacquadio, P.G. [2009], Conflict of interest, (implicit) coalitions and Nash policy games, in: Economics Letters, 105: 303–305
28. Fotion, N. (1998). "Military Ethics". In Chadwick, Ruth (ed.). Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (2 ed.). Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-373932-2
29. Silverman, David (Ed). (2011). Qualitative Research: Issues of Theory, Method and Practice, Third Edition. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage Publications
30. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications
31. Brody, Thomas A. (1993), The Philosophy Behind Physics, Springer Verlag, ISBN 0-387-55914-0. (Luis de la Peña and Peter E. Hodgson, eds
32. Bynum, W.F.; Porter, Roy (2005), Oxford Dictionary of Scientific Quotations, Oxford, ISBN 0-19-858409-1
33. Ashley D, Orenstein DM (2005). Sociological theory: Classical statements (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education. p. 241
34. Weber, Max The Nature of Social Action in Runciman, W.G. 'Weber: Selections in Translation' Cambridge University Press, 1991. p. 7
35.  John Scott. Fifty Key Sociologists: The Contemporary Theorists. Routledge. 2006. p. 19
36. Levine, Donald (ed) 'Simmel: On individuality and social forms' Chicago University Press, 1971. p. 6
37. Bunge, Mario (1983). Epistemology & Methodology II: Understanding the World. Treatise on Basic Philosophy. Vol. 6. Dordrecht; Boston
38. George, Alexander L. 1979. “Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison.” In Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory and Policy, ed. Paul Gordon Lauren, 43–68. New York: The Free Press
39. Rogowski, Ronald. 2010. “How Inference in the Social (but Not the Physical ) Sciences Neglects Theoretical Anomaly.” In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, 2nd ed., ed. Henry E. Brady and David Collier, 89–97. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield
40. Orchestrating “Irreducible simplicity” in science and science communication: Positioning “irreducible simplicity” as a vital guiding principle for effective and bona fide science Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, February 2024
41. Emphasizing “integrationism” in twenty-first century science: Another useful tool to generate better scientific paradigms better quality science Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT October 2024
42. Building upon “Foundationalism” to achieve the objectives of contemporary science: How this can lead to faster scientific progress and inclusive science Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT, October 2024
43. James, Carl (June 1993). "What is applied linguistics?". International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 3 (1): 17–32
44. Wortham, Stanton; Kim, Deoksoon; May, Stephen, eds. (2017). Discourse and Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing
45. Cederblom, J B.; Paulsen, David (2012). Critical Reasoning: Understanding and Criticizing Arguments and Theories (7th ed.). Andover, Hampshire, UK: Cengage Learning
46. Lowry, Paul Benjamin; Humphreys, Sean; Malwitz, Jason; Nix, Joshua C (2007). "A scientometric study of the perceived quality of business and technical communication journals". IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 50 (4): 352–378
47. Reducing the ‘latency period’ for the acceptance of new scientific ideas: Positioning the ‘latency period’ for the acceptance of scientific ideas as an indicator of scientific maturity Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT January 2024
48. Hamby, B.W. (2007) The Philosophy of Anything: Critical Thinking in Context, Kendall Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque Iowa
49. Paul, Richard. (1995) Critical Thinking: How to Prepare Students for a Rapidly Changing World. 4th ed. Foundation for Critical Thinking
50. Paul, Richard and Elder, Linda. (2006) Critical Thinking Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Publishing
51. David Carl Wilson (2020) A Guide to Good Reasoning: Cultivating Intellectual Virtues (2nd edition) University of Minnesota Libraries
52. Gould, S. J. (1996). "A Cerion for Christopher". Natural History 105 (Oct.): 22–29, 78—79