Development of Aluminum Alloys 6061(AA6061) Silicon Carbide (SiC)-Graphite (GR) and Hybrid Composite for Automotive Applications


Authors : P. T. Zubairu; M. Abdullahi; Tobi .A. Agboola; Ajiboye .O. David

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2dpxn3wr

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2tuctp6e

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1509

Abstract : The microstructure and mechanical properties of composite materials made of Silicon carbide (SiC) and Graphite (GR) reinforcement, known as Aluminum Alloy 6061(AA6061) Matrix were developed. Using the stir casting method, the hybrid composites were prepared with 6 weight percent of the reinforcements in the ratio of 0:1,1:3,1:1,3:1,and 1:0. It was determined how the reinforcement particles affected the microstructures and mechanical characteristics of these materials. The microstructure displays a uniformly distributed fine particles of α-Al grains and Mg2Si phase with in the matrix alloy. The microstructure amply demonstrates the presence of the reinforcing particles (SiC and GR) and dendritic development was noted. There are very few indications of particles clusters, and the particles are very dispersed throughout the matrix. Sample A2 (AA6061 25% SiC/ 75% GR) had the highest recorded hardness value of 123.34 HRB4.8,9.33, while the base alloy had the lowest value of 70.36 HRB when compared to the base alloy, the developed hybrid composites showed improved tensile strength. In contrast to the base alloy, which displayed a strength of 115.67N/mm2, Sample A3 demonstrated a maximum strength of 143.88 N/mm2 as compared to the base alloy which showed strength of 115.67 N/mm2. The hard reinforcement particles sharp edges serve as a nucleation site, which is why the strength of samples A4 and A5 decreased when SiC reinforcement is added, the materials extension decreases when the developed hybrid composite materials with samples were compared with the base alloy. In comparison to the created hybrid composite materials, the base alloy displayed a maximum extension of 2.4mm, with sample A5 showing the lowest extension value of 1.23mm. Sample A2 displayed the highest structures rate of 0.060, while sample A5 displayed the lowest strain rate of 0.031. The impact strength values increases from 2.76 (Base alloy) to 4.77j (Sample A5) with the addition of the reinforcement particles. The obtained mechanical properties indicate that the reinforced alloy performed favorably well but not significantly better than the ones in the literature.

Keywords : Stir Casting; Reinforcement Particles; Hybrid Composites, Mechanical Behavior; AA6061 Alloy.

References :

  1. Vijaya Ramnath B, Elanchezhian C, Jaivignesh M, Rajesh S,Parswajinan C, Siddique Ahmed Ghias A.  (2014). Evaluation of mechanical properties of aluminum alloy–alumina–boron carbide metal matrix composites. Mater Des; 58:332–8.
  2. Kaczmar JW, Pietrzak K, Włosi´nski W, (2000). The production and application of metal matrix composite materials. J MaterProcess Technol;106(1–3):58–67.
  3. Tjong S. C (2014). Processing and deformation characteristics of metals reinforced with ceramic nano particles. In: Tjong S-C,editor. Nanocrystalline materials [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier. p. 269–304
  4. Surappa M. K (2003). Aluminum matrix composites: challenges and opportunities. Sadhana. 28(1–2):319–34.
  5. Kok M., (2005). Production and mechanical properties of Al2O3 particle-reinforced 2024 aluminum alloy composites. J. Mater Process Technol. 161(3):381–7.
  6. Rino J. J, Chandramohan D, Sucitharan K. S, Jebin V. D (2012). An overview on development of aluminum metal matrix composites with hybrid reinforcement. IJSR India Online ISSN 2012:2319–7064.
  7. Rohatgi P, (1991). Cast aluminum-matrix composites for automotive applications. J Manag;43(4):10–5.
  8. Anantha Prasad M. G, and Nityanand Bandekar (2015). study of microstructure and mechanical behavior of Aluminum/ Garnet/ Carbone Hybrid metal matrix composites (HMMCs) fabricated by chill casting method. Journal of materials science and chemical engineering. 3, pp. 1-8.
  9. Surapa M. K., (2003). Aluminum matrix composites: Challenges and opportunities. Sadhana 28 (1 & 2), pp. 319–334.
  10. Pydi R. H., Adhithan B., Bakrudeen A., (2013). Microstructure Exploration of the Aluminum-Tungsten Carbide Composite with different Manufacturing circumstances. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering. 2 (6).
  11. Garcia-Cordovilla C., Narciso J., and Louis E., (1996). Abrasive wear resistance of aluminum alloy/ceramic particulate composites. Wear, vol. 192, pp. 170-177.
  12. Michael Oluwatosin Bodunrin, Kenneth Kanayo Alaneme, Lesley Heath Chown Michael Oluwatosin Bodunrin, Kenneth Kanayo Alaneme, Lesley Heath Chown, (2015). Aluminum matrix hybrid composites: a review of reinforcement philosophies; mechanical, corrosion and tribological characteristics. Journal of materials research and technology. 4(4):434–445.
  13. Alaneme K. K, Aluko A. O., (2012). Fracture toughness (K1C) and tensile properties of as cast and age hardened aluminium (6063)-SiC particulate composites. Sci. Iran, 19(4), pp. 992-996.
  14. Rajmohan T., Palanikumar K., Arumugam S., (2013). Synthesis and characterization of sintered hybrid aluminium matrix composites reinforced with nano copper oxide particles and micro silicon carbide particles.
  15. ASTM F1372-93. (2005). Standard Test Method for Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Analysis of Metallic Surface Condition for Gas Distribution System Components. p3.
  16. ASTM E384-11. (2012). Standard Test Method for Knoop and Vivkers Hardness of Materials. p6
  17. ASTM E 8M: Standard Test Method for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials (Metric), Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Philadelphia; 1991.
  18. ASTM E 602-91: Standard test method for sharp-notch impact testing with flat specimens. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials; 1992.
  19. Poddar, P., Srivastava, V., De, P., Sahoo, K., (2007). Processing and mechanical properties of SiC reinforced cast magnesium matrix composites by stir casting process. Materials Science and Engineering: A 460: 357-364.
  20. Kuburi, L. S., Dauda, M., Yaro, S. A. and M. Abdulwahab, (2017). Investigation of the mechanical properties of Aluminum matrix composite for marine structures. Nigerian Journal of Technology Research. 12(2). DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/njtr.v12i2.3  
  21. Sambathkumar M., Navaneethakrishnan P., Ponappa K., Sasikumar K.S.K., (2016). Mechanical and Corrosion Behavior of Al7075 (Hybrid) Metal Matrix Composites by Two Step Stir Casting Process. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures. 14 (2017) 243-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1679-78253132
  22. Bhushan, R. K., Kumar, S., (2011). Influence of SiC particles distribution and their weight percentage on 7075 Al alloy. Journal of materials engineering and performance 20(2): 317-323.

23. Sasikumar K. S. K.  (2017). Mechanical and Corrosion Behavior of Al7075 (Hybrid) Metal Matrix Composites by Two Step Stir Casting Process. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures. 14, Pp 243-255

The microstructure and mechanical properties of composite materials made of Silicon carbide (SiC) and Graphite (GR) reinforcement, known as Aluminum Alloy 6061(AA6061) Matrix were developed. Using the stir casting method, the hybrid composites were prepared with 6 weight percent of the reinforcements in the ratio of 0:1,1:3,1:1,3:1,and 1:0. It was determined how the reinforcement particles affected the microstructures and mechanical characteristics of these materials. The microstructure displays a uniformly distributed fine particles of α-Al grains and Mg2Si phase with in the matrix alloy. The microstructure amply demonstrates the presence of the reinforcing particles (SiC and GR) and dendritic development was noted. There are very few indications of particles clusters, and the particles are very dispersed throughout the matrix. Sample A2 (AA6061 25% SiC/ 75% GR) had the highest recorded hardness value of 123.34 HRB4.8,9.33, while the base alloy had the lowest value of 70.36 HRB when compared to the base alloy, the developed hybrid composites showed improved tensile strength. In contrast to the base alloy, which displayed a strength of 115.67N/mm2, Sample A3 demonstrated a maximum strength of 143.88 N/mm2 as compared to the base alloy which showed strength of 115.67 N/mm2. The hard reinforcement particles sharp edges serve as a nucleation site, which is why the strength of samples A4 and A5 decreased when SiC reinforcement is added, the materials extension decreases when the developed hybrid composite materials with samples were compared with the base alloy. In comparison to the created hybrid composite materials, the base alloy displayed a maximum extension of 2.4mm, with sample A5 showing the lowest extension value of 1.23mm. Sample A2 displayed the highest structures rate of 0.060, while sample A5 displayed the lowest strain rate of 0.031. The impact strength values increases from 2.76 (Base alloy) to 4.77j (Sample A5) with the addition of the reinforcement particles. The obtained mechanical properties indicate that the reinforced alloy performed favorably well but not significantly better than the ones in the literature.

Keywords : Stir Casting; Reinforcement Particles; Hybrid Composites, Mechanical Behavior; AA6061 Alloy.

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe