Authors :
Penina, Njauledi Paulo; Dr. Fulgence Dominick Waryoba
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 5 - May
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/scv6pkmr
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may2058
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
This study examines the economic determinants of environmental emissions in Tanzania from 1990 to 2023,
focusing on key macroeconomic factors such as land use (LU), gross domestic product (GDP), foreign direct investment
(FDI), renewable energy consumption (REC), and population growth rate (PGR). Using a Vector Error Correction Model
(VECM), Johansen’s co-integration test, the study investigates both short- and long-run relationships between these
variables and environmental emissions. The results indicate that LU, GDP, and FDI have a significant positive impact on
emissions, implying that economic expansion and foreign investments contribute to environmental degradation. Conversely,
REC negatively influences emissions, highlighting the importance of renewable energy adoption in mitigating pollution. The
findings also suggest that PGR (Population Growth Rate) contributes to increased emissions through rising energy demand,
urbanization, and expansion of economic activities. The VECM results show that emissions adjust to equilibrium in response
to economic shocks. Despite the existence of environmental policies, their effectiveness appears limited due to weak
enforcement mechanisms. The study concludes that stringent environmental regulations, coupled with increased investment
in renewable energy, are essential to curb emissions. Additionally, policies should focus on sustainable land use and
responsible foreign investment.
Keywords :
Environmental Emissions, Economic growth, Greenhouse Gases, Sustainable Development.
References :
- Alam, M. S., Murad, M. W., Noman, A. H. M., & Ozturk, I. (2021). Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, renewable energy, and financial development in developing countries. Renewable Energy, 177, 715–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.017
- Albulescu, C. T., Tiwari, A. K., Yoon, S. M., & Kang, S. H. (2022). Quantile fixed-effect panel data analysis: An application to energy consumption and economic growth. Energy Economics, 108, 105884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105884
- Allaire, M., & Brown, S. (2016). The impact of environmental regulations on business competitiveness: A review. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rev019
- Ansuategi, A., & Perrings, C. (1999). Transboundary externalities in the environmental Kuznets curve. Environmental & Resource Economics, 14(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008348614511
- Assamoi, G. R., & Wang, Y. (2023). The impact of environmental policy stringency on air quality: A NARDL approach for China and the U.S. Environmental Research, 216, 114436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.114436
- Bennett, E. M., Carpenter, S. R., & Gordon, L. J. (2008). Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12(12), 1394–1404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x
- Chakraborty, D., & Maity, S. (2020). Global climate change and economic development: A policy perspective. Environmental and Resource Economics, 76(2), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00450-9
- Cimen, M. (2021). Role of circular economy in achieving environmental sustainability: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 125645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125645
- Diffenbaugh, N. S., & Burke, M. (2019). Global warming has increased global economic inequality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(20), 9808–9813. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816020116
- Du, Q., & Zhou, X. (2022). The effectiveness of pollution levies: Empirical evidence from China’s sulfur dioxide emission charge reform. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 24(3), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-022-00343-4
- Du, X. (2013). The impact of environmental regulations on industry performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.02.002
- Ehrlich, P. R., & Holdren, J. P. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171(3977), 1212–1217. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3977.1212
- Everett, T., Ishwaran, M., Ansaloni, G. P., & Rubin, A. (2010). Economic growth and the environment. DEFRA Evidence and Analysis Series Paper, 2, 1–36.
- Grafton, R. Q., Kompas, T., & Van Ha, P. (2014). The economics of environmental security. Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.016
- Guler, M., & Ozarslan, B. (2023). Environmental pollution and externalities: A theoretical framework. Journal of Environmental Economics, 5(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeeco.2023.101123
- Guo, Y., & Che, X. (2023). China's two-stage carbon emission strategy: Progress and challenges. Energy Policy, 172, 113012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113012
- Hailemariam, A., & Erdiaw-Kwasie, M. O. (2022). Towards net-zero emissions: Policy approaches and challenges. Energy Research & Social Science, 87, 102453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102453
- Hassan, A. M., & Rousseliere, D. (2022). Environmental policy and economic growth: A systematic GMM approach. Economic Modelling, 105, 105912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105912
- IMF. (2023). Environmental protection expenditure and economic performance: Evidence from Tanzania. International Monetary Fund Working Papers, WP/23/101.
- Lee, C., Park, J., & Kim, H. (2021). The economic-environmental trade-off: Policy implications for sustainable development. Sustainability, 13(10), 5438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105438
- Liu, Y., He, Z., & Zhang, X. (2023). The impact of environmental policy stringency on CO2 emissions in the Asia-Pacific region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 386, 135739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135739
- OECD. (2020). The future of global greenhouse gas emissions: Trends and policy implications. OECD Environmental Outlook Report.
- Pettinger, T. (2021). Can economic growth and environmental sustainability coexist? Economics Help Blog.
- Polasky, S., Costello, C., & McAusland, C. (2019). Protecting natural capital through ecosystem services valuation. Science, 364(6445), 544–545. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw1715
- Surya, B., Shinta, T., & Yuniarti, R. (2021). The role of technological innovation in reducing environmental pollution. Environmental Research, 196, 110383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110383
- United Nations. (2021). COP26 climate summit: Global efforts towards net-zero emissions. UN Climate Change Conference Report.
- Waryoba, J. (2023). Urbanization, industrialization, and environmental pollution in Tanzania. Tanzania Economic Review, 5(1), 34–57.
- Wolde, Y. (2015). Industrial pollution and economic growth: A critical review. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 12(8), 2345–2360.
- World Health Organization. (2016). Environmental risks and global health: An overview. WHO Environmental Health Report.
- Wu, J., & Chen, L. (2023). Fiscal environmental protection expenditures and CO2 emissions in China: Evidence from panel data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 120, 102543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102543
This study examines the economic determinants of environmental emissions in Tanzania from 1990 to 2023,
focusing on key macroeconomic factors such as land use (LU), gross domestic product (GDP), foreign direct investment
(FDI), renewable energy consumption (REC), and population growth rate (PGR). Using a Vector Error Correction Model
(VECM), Johansen’s co-integration test, the study investigates both short- and long-run relationships between these
variables and environmental emissions. The results indicate that LU, GDP, and FDI have a significant positive impact on
emissions, implying that economic expansion and foreign investments contribute to environmental degradation. Conversely,
REC negatively influences emissions, highlighting the importance of renewable energy adoption in mitigating pollution. The
findings also suggest that PGR (Population Growth Rate) contributes to increased emissions through rising energy demand,
urbanization, and expansion of economic activities. The VECM results show that emissions adjust to equilibrium in response
to economic shocks. Despite the existence of environmental policies, their effectiveness appears limited due to weak
enforcement mechanisms. The study concludes that stringent environmental regulations, coupled with increased investment
in renewable energy, are essential to curb emissions. Additionally, policies should focus on sustainable land use and
responsible foreign investment.
Keywords :
Environmental Emissions, Economic growth, Greenhouse Gases, Sustainable Development.