Determinants of Environmental Emissions and Policy Implications: Evidence from Tanzania 1990 to 2023


Authors : Penina, Njauledi Paulo; Dr. Fulgence Dominick Waryoba

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 5 - May


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/scv6pkmr

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may2058

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study examines the economic determinants of environmental emissions in Tanzania from 1990 to 2023, focusing on key macroeconomic factors such as land use (LU), gross domestic product (GDP), foreign direct investment (FDI), renewable energy consumption (REC), and population growth rate (PGR). Using a Vector Error Correction Model (VECM), Johansen’s co-integration test, the study investigates both short- and long-run relationships between these variables and environmental emissions. The results indicate that LU, GDP, and FDI have a significant positive impact on emissions, implying that economic expansion and foreign investments contribute to environmental degradation. Conversely, REC negatively influences emissions, highlighting the importance of renewable energy adoption in mitigating pollution. The findings also suggest that PGR (Population Growth Rate) contributes to increased emissions through rising energy demand, urbanization, and expansion of economic activities. The VECM results show that emissions adjust to equilibrium in response to economic shocks. Despite the existence of environmental policies, their effectiveness appears limited due to weak enforcement mechanisms. The study concludes that stringent environmental regulations, coupled with increased investment in renewable energy, are essential to curb emissions. Additionally, policies should focus on sustainable land use and responsible foreign investment.

Keywords : Environmental Emissions, Economic growth, Greenhouse Gases, Sustainable Development.

References :

  1. Alam, M. S., Murad, M. W., Noman, A. H. M., & Ozturk, I. (2021). Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, renewable energy, and financial development in developing countries. Renewable Energy, 177, 715–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.017
  2. Albulescu, C. T., Tiwari, A. K., Yoon, S. M., & Kang, S. H. (2022). Quantile fixed-effect panel data analysis: An application to energy consumption and economic growth. Energy Economics, 108, 105884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105884
  3. Allaire, M., & Brown, S. (2016). The impact of environmental regulations on business competitiveness: A review. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rev019
  4. Ansuategi, A., & Perrings, C. (1999). Transboundary externalities in the environmental Kuznets curve. Environmental & Resource Economics, 14(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008348614511
  5. Assamoi, G. R., & Wang, Y. (2023). The impact of environmental policy stringency on air quality: A NARDL approach for China and the U.S. Environmental Research, 216, 114436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.114436
  6. Bennett, E. M., Carpenter, S. R., & Gordon, L. J. (2008). Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12(12), 1394–1404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x
  7. Chakraborty, D., & Maity, S. (2020). Global climate change and economic development: A policy perspective. Environmental and Resource Economics, 76(2), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00450-9
  8. Cimen, M. (2021). Role of circular economy in achieving environmental sustainability: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 125645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125645
  9. Diffenbaugh, N. S., & Burke, M. (2019). Global warming has increased global economic inequality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(20), 9808–9813. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816020116
  10. Du, Q., & Zhou, X. (2022). The effectiveness of pollution levies: Empirical evidence from China’s sulfur dioxide emission charge reform. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 24(3), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-022-00343-4
  11. Du, X. (2013). The impact of environmental regulations on industry performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.02.002
  12. Ehrlich, P. R., & Holdren, J. P. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171(3977), 1212–1217. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3977.1212
  13. Everett, T., Ishwaran, M., Ansaloni, G. P., & Rubin, A. (2010). Economic growth and the environment. DEFRA Evidence and Analysis Series Paper, 2, 1–36.
  14. Grafton, R. Q., Kompas, T., & Van Ha, P. (2014). The economics of environmental security. Journal of Environmental Management, 145, 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.016
  15. Guler, M., & Ozarslan, B. (2023). Environmental pollution and externalities: A theoretical framework. Journal of Environmental Economics, 5(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeeco.2023.101123
  16. Guo, Y., & Che, X. (2023). China's two-stage carbon emission strategy: Progress and challenges. Energy Policy, 172, 113012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113012
  17. Hailemariam, A., & Erdiaw-Kwasie, M. O. (2022). Towards net-zero emissions: Policy approaches and challenges. Energy Research & Social Science, 87, 102453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102453
  18. Hassan, A. M., & Rousseliere, D. (2022). Environmental policy and economic growth: A systematic GMM approach. Economic Modelling, 105, 105912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105912
  19. IMF. (2023). Environmental protection expenditure and economic performance: Evidence from Tanzania. International Monetary Fund Working Papers, WP/23/101.
  20. Lee, C., Park, J., & Kim, H. (2021). The economic-environmental trade-off: Policy implications for sustainable development. Sustainability, 13(10), 5438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105438
  21. Liu, Y., He, Z., & Zhang, X. (2023). The impact of environmental policy stringency on CO2 emissions in the Asia-Pacific region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 386, 135739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135739
  22. OECD. (2020). The future of global greenhouse gas emissions: Trends and policy implications. OECD Environmental Outlook Report.
  23. Pettinger, T. (2021). Can economic growth and environmental sustainability coexist? Economics Help Blog.
  24. Polasky, S., Costello, C., & McAusland, C. (2019). Protecting natural capital through ecosystem services valuation. Science, 364(6445), 544–545. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw1715
  25. Surya, B., Shinta, T., & Yuniarti, R. (2021). The role of technological innovation in reducing environmental pollution. Environmental Research, 196, 110383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110383
  26. United Nations. (2021). COP26 climate summit: Global efforts towards net-zero emissions. UN Climate Change Conference Report.
  27. Waryoba, J. (2023). Urbanization, industrialization, and environmental pollution in Tanzania. Tanzania Economic Review, 5(1), 34–57.
  28. Wolde, Y. (2015). Industrial pollution and economic growth: A critical review. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 12(8), 2345–2360.
  29. World Health Organization. (2016). Environmental risks and global health: An overview. WHO Environmental Health Report.
  30. Wu, J., & Chen, L. (2023). Fiscal environmental protection expenditures and CO2 emissions in China: Evidence from panel data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 120, 102543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102543

This study examines the economic determinants of environmental emissions in Tanzania from 1990 to 2023, focusing on key macroeconomic factors such as land use (LU), gross domestic product (GDP), foreign direct investment (FDI), renewable energy consumption (REC), and population growth rate (PGR). Using a Vector Error Correction Model (VECM), Johansen’s co-integration test, the study investigates both short- and long-run relationships between these variables and environmental emissions. The results indicate that LU, GDP, and FDI have a significant positive impact on emissions, implying that economic expansion and foreign investments contribute to environmental degradation. Conversely, REC negatively influences emissions, highlighting the importance of renewable energy adoption in mitigating pollution. The findings also suggest that PGR (Population Growth Rate) contributes to increased emissions through rising energy demand, urbanization, and expansion of economic activities. The VECM results show that emissions adjust to equilibrium in response to economic shocks. Despite the existence of environmental policies, their effectiveness appears limited due to weak enforcement mechanisms. The study concludes that stringent environmental regulations, coupled with increased investment in renewable energy, are essential to curb emissions. Additionally, policies should focus on sustainable land use and responsible foreign investment.

Keywords : Environmental Emissions, Economic growth, Greenhouse Gases, Sustainable Development.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe