Authors : B. Siri Sumedha Thero; K.S.H.M.V.W.W. Senevirathne

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5u8ra4xr

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/48j2z3c7

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1837

Abstract : This quantitative study explores the correlation between psychological and contextual characteristics and student achievement in chemistry within senior secondary schools in Sri Lanka. The research addresses the persistent low performance in chemistry, a critical subject within the science curriculum, by examining various influencing factors. The study utilized a cluster random sampling method, selecting 302 students and 114 teachers from the Kegalle Education Zone. A pilot test was conducted to refine the instruments, followed by confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory data analysis to ensure reliability and validity. The psychological factors investigated include teachers' teaching styles, students' perceptions of chemistry, subject satisfaction, and attitudes toward chemistry. Contextual factors encompass school type and gender. Data collection involved standardized instruments and a structured chemistry examination, with analysis performed using SPSS and Amos software. The findings reveal significant positive correlations between students' perceptions, satisfaction, attitudes towards chemistry, and their academic achievement. Additionally, the study highlights differences in achievement based on school type and gender, emphasizing the importance of tailored educational strategies. The results underscore the necessity for targeted interventions and policy reforms to enhance chemistry education in Sri Lanka. These insights aim to inform educators and policymakers, fostering improved educational outcomes in the region.

Keywords : Student Achievement, Chemistry Education, Psychological Factors, Contextual Characteristics, Sri Lankan Secondary Schools

References :

1. American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Arbuckle, J. L. (2016). IBM SPSS Amos 24 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: IBM.
3. Bennett, J. (2019). Teaching and learning science: A guide to recent research and its applications. New York, NY: Continuum.
4. Bennett, J. (2019). Teaching and learning science: A guide to recent research and its applications. New York, NY: Continuum.
5. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
6. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
12. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). London, UK: Sage.
13. Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom environment. Routledge International Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York, NY: Routledge.
14. Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159-1176.
15. Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2016). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
16. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381-391.
17. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
18. Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2006). Gender similarities in mathematics and science. Science, 314(5799), 599-600.
19. Jones, L., & Hargreaves, D. (2018). Understanding student performance in chemistry: The role of teaching and learning strategies. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(3), 412-423.
20. Jones, L., & Hargreaves, D. (2018). Understanding student performance in chemistry: The role of teaching and learning strategies. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(3), 412-423.
21. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
22. Lee, V. E., & Burkam, D. T. (2003). Dropping out of high school: The role of school organization and structure. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 353-393.
23. Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.
25. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
26. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
27. Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Qualitative and quantitative landscapes of classroom learning environments. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 623-640). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
28. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Wang, J., & Goldschmidt, P. (2003). Importance of middle school mathematics on high school students' mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(1), 3-19.