Consistency of Stratified Random Sampling Estimators in Repetive Sampling


Authors : Adekunle Nurudeen MASOPA; Adisa Anthony AGBONA; Sabiu MUBARAK; Adefunke Rukayat MASOPA

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 11 - November


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4bskdwwp

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/259vdjah

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14410091


Abstract : This study focuses on consistency of stratified random sampling in repeated sampling processes within a population with heterogeneous characteristics. The data for the study is a real life data on number of students in schools where the stratification is on the basis of ownership (public or private). Proportional allocation method was used to determine the number of units (schools) to be chosen from each stratum for a given sample size and four (4) independent samples of equal sample sizes were chosen and estimates of mean ,variance as well as confidence interval obtained with the estimators of stratified random sampling. The estimates obtained for each sample sizes were subjected to a test of significance to test the null hypothesis of no significance difference between the estimates and the actual value using the t-statistic. The analysis revealed that the estimates obtained for different samples differs but the test of significance revealed that there is no significant difference in the estimates across the independent samples as the P-values are less the level of significance   0.05 except for n  30 which could be considered as an outlier. Also, there is no significant difference in the estimates of variances for the various sample sizes considered for this study with a Pvalue of 0. 2344.

Keywords : Resampling, Stratified Sampling, Proportional Allocation, Estimators, P-value.

References :

  1. Adebola, F.B & Ajayi ,O.S (2014).Comparison of allocation procedures in a stratified random sampling   of skewed  population under different distributions and sample sizes.
  2. Ahamed, M. I., Gupt, B. K., & Phukon, M. (2021). Methods of stratification for a generalised auxiliary variable optimum allocation. Mathematics and Statistics, 9(5), 617-629.
  3. Aubry, P. (2024). On the implementation of stratified two-stage simple random sampling without replacement, with possible collapsed strata. MethodsX, 13, 102928.
  4. Bolarinwa, O. A. (2020). Sample size estimation for health and social science researchers: The principles and considerations for different study designs. Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal, 27(2), 67-75.
  5. Clark, R. G., & Steel, D. G. (2022). Sample design for analysis using high-influence probability sampling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 185(4), 1733-1756.
  6. Enzo, V. (2021). The use of stratification in a mixed abilities class to facilitate note-taking in Italian L2 during Geography lessons: A case study conducted in an after-school laboratory for migrant students.
  7. Fayose,T.S., &Adebara,L(2018). Efficiency of Proportional Allocation Procedure over other Allocation  Procedures in Stratified Random Sampling. International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications.2 (4),pp.13-15.
  8. Horgan,J.M.(2006).Stratification of skewed population. International statistical review.74(1),pp.67-76
  9. Iliyasu, R., & Etikan, I. (2021). Comparison of quota sampling and stratified random sampling. Biom. Biostat. Int. J. Rev10(1), 24-27.
  10. Kanaki, K., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2023). Sample design challenges: an educational research paradigm. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 15(3), 266-285.
  11. Kareem,A.O.,Oshungade, I.O.,& Oyeyemi, G.M(2015). A note on the precision of Stratified Sampling. Open Journal   of Statistics,5(2)
  12. Karunarathna, I., De Alvis, K., Gunasena, P., & Jayawardana, A. (2024). Designing and conducting clinical research: Methodological approaches.
  13. Lawal,M.,Salami,A.,Obisesan,K.O.,Yusuff,K.M.,&Owolabi,A.A.(2018).On the comparison of some methods of  allocation in stratified random sampling for skewed population. International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics studies. 6(3).pp.29-42.
  14. Lohr, S. L. (2021). Sampling: Design and analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  15. Mweshi, G. K., & Sakyi, K. (2020). Application of sampling methods for the research design. Archives of Business Review–Vol8(11), 180-193.
  16. Olayiwola,O.M.,Apantaku,F.S.,Bisira,H.O.,&Adewara,A.A.(2013).Efficiency of Neyman allocation procedure   over other allocation procedures in stratified sampling.American Journal of Theoretical and Applied    Statistics. 2(5).pp.122-127
  17. Oyoo, D. O. (2021). Ratio Estimation of Finite Population Total in Stratified Random Sampling Under Non-response (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).
  18. Pandey, G. P. (2024). Advancing English Language Teaching through Survey Research: Methodologies,  Impacts and Applications. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 7(2), 127-141.
  19. Pawar, P. B., Verma, R., Daniel, C. O., & Sayyad, L. (2023). Foundation of Research Methodology: A Comprehensive Guide. Red Unicorn Publication.
  20. Rahman, M. M., Tabash, M. I., Salamzadeh, A., Abduli, S., & Rahaman, M. S. (2022). Sampling techniques (probability) for quantitative social science researchers: a conceptual guidelines with examples. Seeu Review17(1), 42-51.
  21. Shah, M. Y.(2024). Some New Aspects of Post Stratification in Sample Surveys (Doctoral dissertation, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Jammu).
  22. Sharma, L. R. (2023). Choosing appropriate probability sampling designs in research. Health, 2, 4-21.
  23. Udomboso,C.G.,Akanbi,O.B.,Afolabi,S.A.(2019).Application of regression type estimator in double sampling skills enrolment in Oyo State. Global  Scientific Journal.7 (3).pp. 853-863.
  24. Verma, R., Verma, S., & Abhishek, K. (2024). Research methodology. Booksclinic Publishing.
  25. Wu, C. (2022). Statistical inference with non-probability survey samples. Survey Methodology, 48(2), 283-311.

This study focuses on consistency of stratified random sampling in repeated sampling processes within a population with heterogeneous characteristics. The data for the study is a real life data on number of students in schools where the stratification is on the basis of ownership (public or private). Proportional allocation method was used to determine the number of units (schools) to be chosen from each stratum for a given sample size and four (4) independent samples of equal sample sizes were chosen and estimates of mean ,variance as well as confidence interval obtained with the estimators of stratified random sampling. The estimates obtained for each sample sizes were subjected to a test of significance to test the null hypothesis of no significance difference between the estimates and the actual value using the t-statistic. The analysis revealed that the estimates obtained for different samples differs but the test of significance revealed that there is no significant difference in the estimates across the independent samples as the P-values are less the level of significance   0.05 except for n  30 which could be considered as an outlier. Also, there is no significant difference in the estimates of variances for the various sample sizes considered for this study with a Pvalue of 0. 2344.

Keywords : Resampling, Stratified Sampling, Proportional Allocation, Estimators, P-value.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe