Authors :
Dr. Chandralekha; Dr. Pradeep Christopher; Dr. Senthil K Kumar; Dr. Mohammed Afradh; Dr. Satish Kumar
Volume/Issue :
Volume 7 - 2022, Issue 5 - May
Google Scholar :
https://bit.ly/3IIfn9N
Scribd :
https://bit.ly/39gabhM
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6629866
Abstract :
The aim of this study was to assess and compare
the anaesthetic efficacy of 2% lignocaine in combination
with 0.5% bupivacaine in 1:1 ratio versus 0.5%
bupivacaine for inferior alveolar nerve block in surgical
removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars.
Method: 15 patients (18 to 35 years)who meet the
inclusive criteria were included in theintergroup
comparison study.Based ontheanaesthetic modality used
in this study two groups (A and B) were made. The
Groups were given classical inferior alveolar nerve block
injection for impaction surgery i.e., Group A were
injected with a freshly prepared solution of 1 ml of 2%
lignocaine hydrochloride (without adrenaline) admixed
with 1ml of 0.5% bupivacaine on one side for surgical
removal ofimpacted third molar whereas Group B
included same 15 patients but this group candidates
received 2 ml of 0.5% plain bupivacaine for
surgicalremoval of impacted mandibular third molar
oncontralateral side. A time interval of 3-4 weeks was
given between the two procedures and the following
parameters were evaluated the pain on injection, the
onset of anaesthesia,the duration of anaesthesia and the
hemodynamic parameters were evaluated.
Keywords :
Anaesthetics, Bupivacaine, Impaction, Inferior alveolar nerve block, Lignocaine
The aim of this study was to assess and compare
the anaesthetic efficacy of 2% lignocaine in combination
with 0.5% bupivacaine in 1:1 ratio versus 0.5%
bupivacaine for inferior alveolar nerve block in surgical
removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars.
Method: 15 patients (18 to 35 years)who meet the
inclusive criteria were included in theintergroup
comparison study.Based ontheanaesthetic modality used
in this study two groups (A and B) were made. The
Groups were given classical inferior alveolar nerve block
injection for impaction surgery i.e., Group A were
injected with a freshly prepared solution of 1 ml of 2%
lignocaine hydrochloride (without adrenaline) admixed
with 1ml of 0.5% bupivacaine on one side for surgical
removal ofimpacted third molar whereas Group B
included same 15 patients but this group candidates
received 2 ml of 0.5% plain bupivacaine for
surgicalremoval of impacted mandibular third molar
oncontralateral side. A time interval of 3-4 weeks was
given between the two procedures and the following
parameters were evaluated the pain on injection, the
onset of anaesthesia,the duration of anaesthesia and the
hemodynamic parameters were evaluated.
Keywords :
Anaesthetics, Bupivacaine, Impaction, Inferior alveolar nerve block, Lignocaine
