Authors :
Anakha Santhosh; Rajesh Pillai; Afzal A; Vineet R V; Arunima G S; Athira Ramesh ; Sandeep K V
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 2 - February
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/4r8e3hbf
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4wm5h93k
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14881341
Abstract :
Aim
The aim of the study was to compare the dentinal crack formation by different heat treated single file systems ,namely
TruNatomy ,One Curve, AF F One and Protaper F1 using Scanning Electron microscopy.
Materials And Methods
Forty extracted mandibular premolars were taken. After cleaning the soft tissue debris and calculus from the surface
of the teeth, the teeth were decoronated with a low speed diamond disc under water cooling to obtain the roots of
standardized lengths of 12mm.
In group 1, root canals were prepared with the TruNatomy files. In Group 2, One Curve files were used to prepare the
canals. In Group 3, AF F One file was used . In Group 4, the root canals were prepared with Protaper F1. During cleaning
and shaping ,irrigation was performed with sodium hypochlorite and normal saline. Then after root canal preparation ,all
canals were irrigated with 2 ml distilled water and the roots were kept moist in distilled water throughout all experimental
procedures to prevent the effect of dehydration on roots.
Conclusion
TruNatomy rotary files produced fewer dentinal cracks when compared to other files tested. AF F One files caused
statistically significant increase in dentinal crack formation than other tested groups.. There was no statistically significant
difference in crack formation between One Curve and ProTaper Gold files.
Keywords :
Dentinal Crack, Heat Treated Files, Scanning Electron Microscope.
References :
- Pedullà, E., Genovesi, F., Rapisarda, S., La Rosa, G. R., Grande, N. M., Plotino, G., & Adorno, C. G. (2017). Effects of 6 Single-File Systems on Dentinal Crack Formation. Journal of endodontics, 43(3), 456–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.038.
- R, Gupta & A, Tomer & S, Rohilla. (2016). Single file endodontics: boon or myth?. Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences. 3. 102-105. 10.21276/apjhs.2016.3.2.18.
- Kuzekanani M. (2018). Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments: Development of the Single-File Systems. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry, 8(5), 386–390. https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_225_18
- Kumar, Sita & Gade, Vandana. (2015). Single File Niti-Rotary Systems. International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences. 4. 701. 10.19056/ijmdsjssmes/2015/v4i1/79965.
- Sharma, P., Goel, M., Verma, S., Sachdeva, G.S., Sharma, N., & Kumar, V. (2017). Entering A New Era in Endodontics with Revolutionary Single File Systems: A Comprehensive Review.
- Bergmans, L., Van Cleynenbreugel, J., Beullens, M., Wevers, M., Van Meerbeek, B., & Lambrechts, P. (2002). Smooth flexible versus active tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments. International endodontic journal, 35(10), 820–828. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00574.x
- Blum, J. Y., Machtou, P., Ruddle, C., & Micallef, J. P. (2003). Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient. Journal of endodontics, 29(9), 567–575. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200309000-00007
- Pasqualini, D., Scotti, N., Tamagnone, L., Ellena, F., & Berutti, E. (2008). Hand-operated and rotary ProTaper instruments: a comparison of working time and number of rotations in simulated root canals. Journal of endodontics, 34(3), 314–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.12.017
- Yoldas, O., Yilmaz, S., Atakan, G., Kuden, C., & Kasan, Z. (2012). Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file. Journal of endodontics, 38(2), 232–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.10.011
- Zupanc, J., Vahdat-Pajouh, N., & Schäfer, E. (2018). New thermomechanically treated NiTi alloys - a review. International endodontic journal, 51(10), 1088–1103. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12924
- Bürklein, S., Tsotsis, P., & Schäfer, E. (2013). Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation: reciprocating versus rotary instrumentation. Journal of endodontics, 39(4), 501–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.045
Aim
The aim of the study was to compare the dentinal crack formation by different heat treated single file systems ,namely
TruNatomy ,One Curve, AF F One and Protaper F1 using Scanning Electron microscopy.
Materials And Methods
Forty extracted mandibular premolars were taken. After cleaning the soft tissue debris and calculus from the surface
of the teeth, the teeth were decoronated with a low speed diamond disc under water cooling to obtain the roots of
standardized lengths of 12mm.
In group 1, root canals were prepared with the TruNatomy files. In Group 2, One Curve files were used to prepare the
canals. In Group 3, AF F One file was used . In Group 4, the root canals were prepared with Protaper F1. During cleaning
and shaping ,irrigation was performed with sodium hypochlorite and normal saline. Then after root canal preparation ,all
canals were irrigated with 2 ml distilled water and the roots were kept moist in distilled water throughout all experimental
procedures to prevent the effect of dehydration on roots.
Conclusion
TruNatomy rotary files produced fewer dentinal cracks when compared to other files tested. AF F One files caused
statistically significant increase in dentinal crack formation than other tested groups.. There was no statistically significant
difference in crack formation between One Curve and ProTaper Gold files.
Keywords :
Dentinal Crack, Heat Treated Files, Scanning Electron Microscope.