Authors :
CD Adhal; MS Jadhav; SN Sathe; PN Ayare; BJ Deshmukh
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 11 - November
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/2vmprxaa
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/nhd9vf35
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24NOV620
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
The present study was undertaken with the
aim of examining economics of different types of storage
structures, evaluate storage losses, assessing the
profitability of storing onions, and storage efficiency of
onion storages structures. The investigation
encompassed six villages, with three located in Akole and
Sangamner tehsils of the Ahmednagar district. In the
study area, farmers mainly used three different types of
structures for storing onions, which were classified into
the following three categories: Traditional low-cost
thatched roof storage structures, bottom-ventilated
single-row storage structures, and modified bottom-
ventilated double-row storage structures. These
structures differed in the raw materials used for
construction, expected lifespan, and storage losses.
According to study, the maximum net profit was (75.30
%) in modified bottom ventilated double row storage
structure, followed by (45.53%) in Bottom Ventilated
single row storage structure, and minimum was (26.76
%) in Traditional low-cost thatched roof storage
structure. Modified bottom ventilated double row
storage structure is highest net return of other structures
i.e. The most profitable structure regarding other
structures. As the prices of onions fluctuate regularly,
farmers can increase the net profit only by reducing the
total storage losses and total storage cost. Sometimes
even though net profit from onion storage were negative
during few months, farmers were still storing the onions.
Keywords :
Onion, Onion Storage Structures, Storage Losses, Storage Efficiency.
References :
- Anonymous, (2022-23). Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare (Annual Report, 2022). https://pib.gov.in
- Anonymous, Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare (Horticultural Statistical at a Glance 2021). https://agriwelfare.gov.in
- Anonymous, (NHB, 2023-24 first advance estimate). https://www.nhb,gov.in
- Brice J, Currah L, Malins A, Bancroft R (1997). Onion storage in the tropics: A practical guide to methods of storage and their selection. Chatham, UK: Natural Resources Institute.
- Chavan, V. B., Dsouza, T. F., Kokate, S. B. and Sawant, D. M., 1992. Efficacy of storage methods for minimizing the bulb rots of onion. Maharashtra Journal of Horticulture Sciences, 6(1):73-75.
- Deka, B. C., Sarma, D. N., Shadeque, A., Bora, G. C. and Baruah, J. N. (1995) Storage behaviour of few onion cultivars under different storage methods. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Science, 24(3-4): 245-250.
- Eriballo, S.G., Satheesh, N., Fanta, S.W. (2022) Performance Evaluation of Low-cost Storage Structures for Onions (Allium cepa L.) Storage in Bahir Dar, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Philippine Journal of Science - 151 (1):437-448, February (2022).
- Iordachescu, C. S., Fuel, N., Nihailescu, V. and Turbo (1983) Studies on the possibilities of storing onions with reduced energy consumption. Agricultural Engineering Abstract, 8: 3.
- Kassali, R., and Idowu, E. O., (2008). Economics of onion storage systems under tropical conditions. International Journal of Vegetable Sciences, 13(1): 85-97.
- Maini, S. B., Sagar, U. R., Chandan, S. S. and Rajeshkumar, (1997) Evaluation of different structures for storage of onions. Vegetable Science, 24(1):73-74.
- Sapkal, S.B. and Gavali, A.V, (2022) Comparative economics of onion storage structures in western Maharashtra. Research Review committee meeting Report of the research work on agricultural economics, (2021-22) compiled by head, Department Agriculture Economics.
- Selvaraj, S. 1976. Onion: Queen of the kitchen. Kisan World, 3(12): 32-34.
- Tripathi, P.C., Lawande, K.E. (2016) Designing and evaluation of onion storage structures for Indian conditions. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences: ISSN 2167- 0447 Vol 6 (2): pp. 918- 924.
- Tripathi, P. C. and Lawande, K. E. 2003. Onion storage structure for small and marginal farmers. ICAR News, A Science and Technology Newsletter, 9(4): 18-19.
- Warade, S.D., Desale, S.B. and Shinde, K.G. (1997) Studies on storage of onion bulbs Maharashtra Journal Agriculture University 22 (3): 336.
The present study was undertaken with the
aim of examining economics of different types of storage
structures, evaluate storage losses, assessing the
profitability of storing onions, and storage efficiency of
onion storages structures. The investigation
encompassed six villages, with three located in Akole and
Sangamner tehsils of the Ahmednagar district. In the
study area, farmers mainly used three different types of
structures for storing onions, which were classified into
the following three categories: Traditional low-cost
thatched roof storage structures, bottom-ventilated
single-row storage structures, and modified bottom-
ventilated double-row storage structures. These
structures differed in the raw materials used for
construction, expected lifespan, and storage losses.
According to study, the maximum net profit was (75.30
%) in modified bottom ventilated double row storage
structure, followed by (45.53%) in Bottom Ventilated
single row storage structure, and minimum was (26.76
%) in Traditional low-cost thatched roof storage
structure. Modified bottom ventilated double row
storage structure is highest net return of other structures
i.e. The most profitable structure regarding other
structures. As the prices of onions fluctuate regularly,
farmers can increase the net profit only by reducing the
total storage losses and total storage cost. Sometimes
even though net profit from onion storage were negative
during few months, farmers were still storing the onions.
Keywords :
Onion, Onion Storage Structures, Storage Losses, Storage Efficiency.