Comparative Analysis of Air Pollution Tolerance Index and Dust Carrying Capacity in Calotropis procera, Polyalthia Longifolia, and Nerium oleander L. from Different Locations


Authors : Umar, A. K.; Singh, P.; Garu, U.; Ibrahim, H. A.; Tiwari, P.K.; Dhakar, R

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 8 - August

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yc7p5937

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/336j9p3j

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24AUG1079

Abstract : Air pollution from industrialization and vehicle emissions is a serious hazard. This study assesses three native Indian plant species' resilience to pollution and adaptability for various environments by evaluating their Dust Carrying Capacity (DCC) and Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI). Four biochemical parameters— pH, ascorbic acid levels, chlorophyll, and relative water content—were examined in order to determine APTI. By comparing leaf area to dust deposition capacity, DCC was ascertained. The investigation was carried out at Mewar University utilizing conventional techniques for chemical analysis. The results indicate that, in line with the lower pollution levels at Mewar, Calotropis procera had the highest APTI value (13.71) and the lowest in Chanderiya (4.15). Nerium oleander and Polyalthia longifolia both followed a similar pattern. Because of its wider, hairy leaves, Calotropis procera had the maximum capacity (4.8) for dust capture at Mewar Campus. Comparable DCC values (3.8) were noted in Chanderiya (3.9) and beyond the campus, suggesting that it is environment- adaptable. At the Mewar Campus, Polyalthia longifolia displayed the highest DCC (1.8), whereas Nerium oleander consistently displayed lower DCC (0.8) everywhere it was found, most likely as a result of its smaller leaves. The significance of plant species in urban design and environmental management in contaminated areas is highlighted by these findings.

Keywords : APTI, Dust Carrying Capacity, Calotropis Procera, Polyalthia Longifolia, Nerium Oleander, Air Pollution.

References :

  1. P. O. Ukaogo, U. Ewuzie, and C. V. Onwuka, “Environmental pollution: causes, effects, and the remedies,” in Microorganisms for Sustainable Environment and Health, Elsevier, 2020, pp. 419–429. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819001-2.00021-8.
  2. E. A. Ainsworth, P. Lemonnier, and J. M. Wedow, “The influence of rising tropospheric carbon dioxide and ozone on plant productivity,” Plant Biol., vol. 22, no. S1, pp. 5–11, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1111/plb.12973.
  3. C. J. Stevens et al., “The impact of air pollution on terrestrial managed and natural vegetation,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., vol. 378, no. 2183, p. 20190317, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2019.0317.
  4. P. Dubey, K. R. Singh, and S. K. Goyal, “Traffic related air pollution with particulate matter, sulfur pollutant and carbon monoxide levels near NH-44 in India,” Sādhanā, vol. 47, no. 4, p. 249, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12046-022-02032-9.
  5. M. Yadav, N. K. Singh, S. P. Sahu, and H. Padhiyar, “Investigations on air quality of a critically polluted industrial city using multivariate statistical methods: Way forward for future sustainability,” Chemosphere, vol. 291, p. 133024, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133024.
  6. R. M. Patil and H. T. Dinde, “Status of Ambient Air Pollution in Different States of India during 1990-2015,” Curr. World Environ., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 245–264, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.12944/CWE.18.1.21.
  7. P. Gireesh Kumar, P. Lekhana, M. Tejaswi, and S. Chandrakala, “Effects of vehicular emissions on the urban environment- a state of the art,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 45, pp. 6314–6320, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.739.
  8. M. Filonchyk, M. P. Peterson, L. Zhang, V. Hurynovich, and Y. He, “Greenhouse gases emissions and global climate change: Examining the influence of CO2, CH4, and N2O,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 935, p. 173359, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173359.
  9. K. Walia, R. K. Aggrawal, and S. K. Bhardwaj, “Evaluation of Air Pollution Tolerance Index and Anticipated Performance Index of Plants and their Role in Development of Green Belt along National Highway-22,” Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., vol. 8, no. 03, pp. 2498–2508, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2019.803.296.
  10. A. Cozea, G.-C. Manea, E. Bucur, and G. A. Catrina Traistaru, “Sensitive bioindicator plants studies, under the environmental conditions of climate change impact,” Proc. Int. Conf. Bus. Excell., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 50–58, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.2478/picbe-2020-0006
  11. S. Shahrukh et al., “Air pollution tolerance, anticipated performance, and metal accumulation indices of four evergreen tree species in Dhaka, Bangladesh,” Curr. Plant Biol., vol. 35–36, p. 100296, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cpb.2023.100296.
  12. M. L. Antenozio, C. Caissutti, F. M. Caporusso, D. Marzi, and P. Brunetti, “Urban Air Pollution and Plant Tolerance: Omics Responses to Ozone, Nitrogen Oxides, and Particulate Matter,” Plants, vol. 13, no. 15, p. 2027, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.3390/plants13152027.
  13. M. Correa-Ochoa, J. Mejia-Sepulveda, J. Saldarriaga-Molina, C. Castro-Jiménez, and D. Aguiar-Gil, “Evaluation of air pollution tolerance index and anticipated performance index of six plant species, in an urban tropical valley: Medellin, Colombia,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 7952–7971, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16037-0.
  14. S. Shrestha, B. Baral, N. B. Dhital, and H.-H. Yang, “Assessing air pollution tolerance of plant species in vegetation traffic barriers in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal,” Sustain. Environ. Res., vol. 31, no. 1, p. 3, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s42834-020-00076-2.
  15. Ishfaq Ahmed and I. T. Wani, “Assessment of Air pollution Tolerance Index of different plant species in Dehradun Uttarakhand,” 2024, Unpublished. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36489.86886.
  16. M. D. Ahire, “Influence of Vehicular Pollution on Chlorophyll Content of Roadside Plants,” in Innovations in Biological Science Vol. 3, Dr. I. Hussain, Ed., B P International, 2024, pp. 106–113. doi: 10.9734/bpi/ibs/v3/8289E.
  17. N. Joshi, A. Chauhan, and P. C. Joshi, “Impact of industrial air pollutants on some biochemical parameters and yield in wheat and mustard plants,” The Environmentalist, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 398–404, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10669-009-9218-4.
  18. E. Athira, K. H. Harsha, K. Athira, C. Jithinsha, K. Mridula, and P. Faseela, “Evaluation of Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Air Pollution in Selected Plant Species around Industrial Premises of Malappuram District, Kerala,” Asian J. Biol., pp. 28–36, May 2022, doi: 10.9734/ajob/2022/v14i430224.
  19. Prof.Menon Geetha and Gharat Raja, “Assessment of Biophysiological Response of Plants Grown In Urban Area,” Jun. 2023, doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.8119907.
  20. M. Kaur and A. K. Nagpal, “Evaluation of air pollution tolerance index and anticipated performance index of plants and their application in development of green space along the urban areas,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 24, no. 23, pp. 18881–18895, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9500-9.
  21. P. Gautam and A. K. Shukla, “Identification of Air Pollution Index of certain local available plants at industrial area on the basis of Air Pollution Tolerance index,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 955, no. 1, p. 012081, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/955/1/012081.
  22. A. El Moukhtari, N. Lamsaadi, and M. Farissi, “Biostimulatory effects of ascorbic acid in improving plant growth, photosynthesis-related parameters and mitigating oxidative damage in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) under salt stress condition,” Biologia (Bratisl.), vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 2375–2385, May 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11756-024-01704-7.
  23. U. Iqbal, M. Hameed, and F. Ahmad, “Structural and functional traits underlying the capacity of Calotropis procera to face different stress conditions,” Plant Physiol. Biochem., vol. 203, p. 107992, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.107992.
  24. P. Nikolaev, O. Rumiantseva, A. Rumyantseva, E. Ivanova, M. Ulianova, and D. Bazhenova, “Dust-holding capacity of tree plantation in the industrial area of Cherepovets, Russia,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 407, p. 03007, 2023, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202340703007.
  25. A. Roy, T. Bhattacharya, and M. Kumari, “Air pollution tolerance, metal accumulation and dust capturing capacity of common tropical trees in commercial and industrial sites,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 722, p. 137622, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137622.
  26. S. Anjum, M. Sarwar, Q. Ali, M. W. Alam, M. T. Manzoor, and A. Mukhtar, “Assessment of bioremediation potential of Calotropis procera and Nerium oleander for sustainable management of vehicular released metals in roadside soils,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 8920, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58897-9.
  27. A. Zahid et al., “Assessing the air pollution tolerance index (APTI) of trees in residential and roadside sites of Lahore, Pakistan,” SN Appl. Sci., vol. 5, no. 11, p. 294, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s42452-023-05470-0.

Air pollution from industrialization and vehicle emissions is a serious hazard. This study assesses three native Indian plant species' resilience to pollution and adaptability for various environments by evaluating their Dust Carrying Capacity (DCC) and Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI). Four biochemical parameters— pH, ascorbic acid levels, chlorophyll, and relative water content—were examined in order to determine APTI. By comparing leaf area to dust deposition capacity, DCC was ascertained. The investigation was carried out at Mewar University utilizing conventional techniques for chemical analysis. The results indicate that, in line with the lower pollution levels at Mewar, Calotropis procera had the highest APTI value (13.71) and the lowest in Chanderiya (4.15). Nerium oleander and Polyalthia longifolia both followed a similar pattern. Because of its wider, hairy leaves, Calotropis procera had the maximum capacity (4.8) for dust capture at Mewar Campus. Comparable DCC values (3.8) were noted in Chanderiya (3.9) and beyond the campus, suggesting that it is environment- adaptable. At the Mewar Campus, Polyalthia longifolia displayed the highest DCC (1.8), whereas Nerium oleander consistently displayed lower DCC (0.8) everywhere it was found, most likely as a result of its smaller leaves. The significance of plant species in urban design and environmental management in contaminated areas is highlighted by these findings.

Keywords : APTI, Dust Carrying Capacity, Calotropis Procera, Polyalthia Longifolia, Nerium Oleander, Air Pollution.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe