⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Community Policing, Public Safety and Law Enforcement and Crime Prevention Strategy: A Causal Model on Social Vulnerability Among Marginalized Sectors in Region XII


Authors : Christopher D. De Castro Jr.

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 7 - July


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mxtfz7hd

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/44akhtu5

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul279

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This study aimed to develop the best-fit model of social vulnerability among marginalized sectors in Region XII. Specifically, it examined the levels of community policing, public safety and law enforcement, crime prevention strategies, and social vulnerability. The study employed a quantitative research design using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach. A total of 400 respondents from marginalized sectors in Region XII participated in the study. The findings revealed that the levels of community policing, public safety and law enforcement, crime prevention strategies, and social vulnerability were all high. The results also showed significant relationships between community policing and social vulnerability, public safety and law enforcement and social vulnerability, and crime prevention strategies and social vulnerability. Furthermore, community policing and crime prevention strategies significantly influenced social vulnerability, while public safety and law enforcement did not have a significant direct influence. Moreover, the best-fit model revealed that public safety and law enforcement significantly predicts community policing and crime prevention strategies. However, community policing did not significantly predict crime prevention strategies and social vulnerability. Crime prevention strategy emerged as the strongest factor influencing social vulnerability among marginalized sectors. This suggests that strengthening crime prevention programs and preventive community-based initiatives can help reduce vulnerability and improve the safety and well-being of marginalized populations. Finally, the best-fit model of social vulnerability among marginalized sectors was anchored on public safety and law enforcement and crime prevention strategies, with crime prevention strategy serving as the primary pathway influencing social vulnerability.

Keywords : Social Vulnerability, Community Policing, Public Safety and Law Enforcement, Crime Prevention Strategy, Marginalized Sectors, Structural Equation Model, Philippines.

References :

  1. Aziani, A. (2022). What happens when the police go on strike? Homicides increase. Evidence from Ceará, Brazil. Global Crime, 23(4), 365-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2022.2098121
  2. Atilano-Tang, L. A. (2023). Policing and Public Safety: The Case of Police Response to Shooting Incidents in Zamboanga City, Philippines. Philippines (July 7, 2023). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4518739
  3. Audu, A, M. (2022). Time to go public. Political Science, Sociology https://doi.org/10.4018/ijpss.314598
  4. Adžajlić-Dedović, A., Hasković, E., & Humačkić, T. (2018). THE RISKS OF VICTIMIZATION AND MEASURES OF PREVENTION. Knowledge International Journal.
  5. Ancheta, D. P., Tani, R., & Uchida, K.-e. (2022). The relationship of social vulnerability and travel behavior with COVID-19 in Metro Manila, Philippines. *Asian Transport Studies, 9*, 100093. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eastsj.2022.100093](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eastsj.2022.100093)
  6. Braga, A. A., et al. (2024). *Disorder policing to reduce crime: An updated systematic review and synthesis*. Crime & Justice Lab / Criminology & Public Policy.
  7. Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  8. Blair, G., Weinstein, J. M., Christia, F., Arias, E., Badran, E., Blair, R. A., ... & Wilke, A. M. (2021). Community policing does not build citizen trust in police or reduce crime in the Global South. Science, 374(6571), eabd3446. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd3446
  9. Braga, A. A., Brunson, R. K., & Drakulich, K. M. (2019). Race, place, and effective policing. Annual review of sociology, 45(1), 535-555. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-SOC-073018-022541
  10. Blair, G., Weinstein, J. M., Christia, F., Arias, E., Badran, E., Blair, R. A., ... & Wilke, A. M. (2021). Community policing does not build citizen trust in police or reduce crime in the Global South. Science, 374(6571), eabd3446. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd3446
  11. Caliso, R. A. C. C., Francisco, J. P. S., & Garcia, E. M. (2020). Broad insecurity and perceived victimization risk. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 32(2), 160-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0260107919829966
  12. Circo, G., Melde, C., & Mcgarrell, E. F. (2019). Fear, victimization, and community characteristics on citizen satisfaction with the police. Policing: An International Journal, 42(2), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-08-2017-0097
  13. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588-608. https://books.google.com.ph/books
  14. Chan, E., Bradford, B., & Stott, C. (2025). *Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis*. Journal of Experimental Criminology. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09595-5](https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-023-09595-5)
  15. Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS). (2014). *Community policing defined.* U.S. Department of Justice.
  16. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). *Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches* (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  17. Che, Y. K., Kim, K., & Mierendorff, K. (2024). *Predictive enforcement*. arXiv. [https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04764](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04764)
  18. Davidson, R.N. (1984). Burglary in the Community; Patterns of Localisation in Offender-Victim Relations.
  19. Denhardt, R.B., & Glaser, M.A. (1999). Communities at Risk: A Community Perspective on Urban Social Problems. National Civic Review, 88, 145-154.
  20. Dobson, K. S. H., et al. (2025). A transparency statement improves trust in community-police encounters. *[Article]*.
  21. Department of Social Welfare and Development. (2022). *Listahanan SOCCSKSARGEN leaves no one behind* (Listahanan 2 database). DSWD Field Office XII. [https://fo12.dswd.gov.ph/2017/05/listahanan-soccsksargen-leaves-no-one-behind/](https://fo12.dswd.gov.ph/2017/05/listahanan-soccsksargen-leaves-no-one-behind/)
  22. Department of Social Welfare and Development – National Household Targeting Office. (2024). *Full list of available data sets from the Listahanan 3* [PDF]. DSWD. [https://listahanan.dswd.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/FINAL-2023-FULL-LIST-OF-AVAILABLE-DATA-SETS-FROM-THE-L3.pdf](https://listahanan.dswd.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/FINAL-2023-FULL-LIST-OF-AVAILABLE-DATA-SETS-FROM-THE-L3.pdf)
  23. De Maillard, J., & Terpstra, J. (2021). Community policing in comparative perspective. In Oxford research encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. https://doi.org/10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190264079.013.615
  24. Dolliver, M. J., Kenney, J. L., & Williams Reid, L. (2022). Assessing the relationships between past victimization, perceived risk of future victimization, and controversial criminal justice policies using structural equation modeling. Criminal justice policy review, 33(1), 74-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/08874034211018235
  25. Enang, I., Murray, J., Dougall, N., Aston, E., Wooff, A., Heyman, I., & Grandison, G. (2022). Vulnerability assessment across the frontline of law enforcement and public health: a systematic review. Policing and society, 32(4), 540-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2021.1927025
  26. Ekici, N. (2022). A meta-analysis of the impact of community policing on crime outcomes. *Journal of Community Safety & Well-Being*.
  27. Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. *Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, 5*(6), 00149. [https://doi.org/10.15406/bboaj.2017.05.00149](https://doi.org/10.15406/bboaj.2017.05.00149)
  28. Ganapathy, J., Nimruzi, A., & Dawar, S. (2020). Fragile Future: Youth Insecurities and Their Relations with Police in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Journal of Human Security, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.12924/johs2022.16020179
  29. Gilbas, S., Deri, R. A., Dio, R. V., & Jamora, M. J. (2024). Performance of the Philippine National Police (PNP) in Camarines Norte. Authorea Preprints. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/14137
  30. Gaynor, T. S., et al. (2020). Social vulnerability and equity: The disproportionate impacts of structural determinants on community vulnerability. *[Journal]*.
  31. Haim, D., Nanes, M., & Davidson, M. W. (2021). Family matters: The double-edged sword of police-community connections. The Journal of Politics, 83(4), 1529-1544. https://doi.org/10.1086/715071
  32. Hevi, S. S., Ketemepi, G. E., Dorkoo, C., & Wuttor, A. (2022). Community policing experience, public trust in the police, citizens’ psychological safety and community well-being in Ghana. Safer communities, 21(2), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/sc-08-2021-0032
  33. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
  34. Israel, G. D. (1992). *Sampling the evidence of extension program impact* (EDIS Document No. PEOD-5). University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service. [https://ufdc.ufl.edu/IR00004854/00001](https://ufdc.ufl.edu/IR00004854/00001)
  35. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. [https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd](https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd)
  36. Johnson, S. D. (2024). *Situational crime prevention: Anticipating tomorrow’s crime today*. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 26(1), 1–17. [https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-024-00441-5](https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-024-00441-5)
  37. Jimmy, CV.B (2023). CRIME VICTIMIZATION OF NEUST CRIMINOLOGY STUDENTS LIVING IN BOARDING HOUSES AT SUMACAB ESTE, CABANATUAN CITY. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra12482
  38. Kilatya, J. M. (2021). POLICE VICTIMIZATION AND SECURITY IN MATHARE NORTH NAIROBI CITY COUNTY, KENYA (Doctoral dissertation, KENYATTA UNIVERSITY). https://doi.org/10.35942/ijcab.v5i4.209
  39. Koper, C. S., et al. (2022). Police activities and community views of police in crime hot spots. *[Journal]*.
  40. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
  41. Laru-an, R., & Beup, C. (2015). *Community policing and peacekeeping approaches in local governance.*
  42. Lizmar, Y., Daza, R., Carolina, Y., Carrillo, R., Maritza, J., Vera, R., Rocio, V., & Parada, P. (2025). Sense of Community as A Risk and/or Protective Factor Associated with Criminal Behavior Among Young People in the Simón Bolívar Neighborhood, Pamplona Municipality. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management.
  43. Lo, T. W., Wolff, K. T., Liu, J. H., & Tsai, Y. H. (2022). *Community policing, social capital, and feelings of safety: A mediation model in Taiwan*. CrimRxiv. [https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/g4xzdpj6/release/1](https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/g4xzdpj6/release/1)
  44. Lo, T. Y., Wolff, K. T., Liu, Y. H., & Tsai, H. E. (2023). Community policing, social capital, and residents’ feelings of safety in Taiwan. Police practice and research, 24(1), 90-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2022.2067155
  45. Lloyd, S., Gray, J., Healey, S., & Opdyke, A. (2022). Social vulnerability to natural hazards in the Philippines. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 79, 103103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103103
  46. Muchow, A. N. (2023). *The Community Safety Partnership and violence in Los Angeles public housing*. Crime & Delinquency, 70(5), 789–815. [https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111231162353](https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111231162353)
  47. McCandless, S., & Vogler, G. M. (2020). “Habermasville”: Police–Community Intersections and Communicative Rationality. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 42(4), 443-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2019.1678350
  48. Muharremi, D., & Ademi, M. (2023). The Role of the Police in Reducing the Fear of Crime in the Community. Access to Just. E. Eur., 242.
  49. Nicor-Mangilimutan, R. G., Mejica, M. N. A., & Caelian, M. V. (2020). Implementation of the community peace and order and public safety program in Negros Occidental, Philippines. Philippine social science journal, 3(3), 76-84. https://doi.org/10.52006/MAIN.V3I3.273
  50. Nillama, V. R., Sabijon, D., Mendoza, J., Paradiang, E., Delposo, B., Sayson, Y., & Albofera, A. (2024). Police Victimization: A Threat to Life. International Journal of Law and Politics Studies, 6(3), 01-15. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlps.2024.6.3.1
  51. Nubani, L. (2023). Community engagement in crime reduction strategies: participatory approaches and local design. *Journal of Policy Research & Management*.
  52. Poquita, J. M. C., & Nabe, N. C. (2023). Collaborative Leadership of Commissioned Law Enforcers: Basis for Police-Community Relation Program. https://doi.org/10.31098/orcadev.v2i2.1604
  53. Patalinghug, E. M., Dacumos, J. R., & Mangahas, J. R. (2022). *Crime prevention strategies and community engagement: A Philippine perspective.*
  54. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2023). *Regional profile: SOCCSKSARGEN (Region XII).* PSA. [https://psa.gov.ph](https://psa.gov.ph)
  55. Patalinghug, M. E., et al. (2023). Correlates of crime prevention and perception of safety: Community policing through crime prevention activities. *Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities*.
  56. Petersen, K., et al. (2023). Police stops to reduce crime: A systematic review and meta-analysis. *Campbell Systematic Reviews*.
  57. Pattavina, A., Byrne, J.M., & Garcia, L. (2006). An Examination of Citizen Involvement in Crime Prevention in High-Risk Versus Low- to Moderate-Risk Neighborhoods. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 203 - 231.
  58. Republic of the Philippines. (1997). *Republic Act No. 8425: Social Reform and Poverty Alleviation Act.* [https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1997/ra_8425_1997.html](https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1997/ra_8425_1997.html)
  59. Roh, S., & Oliver, W. M. (2005). Effects of community policing upon fear of crime: Understanding the causal linkage. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 28(4), 670-683. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510510628758
  60. Siller, H., & Aydin, N. (2022). Using an intersectional lens on vulnerability and resilience in minority and/or marginalized groups during the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review. *Frontiers in Psychology, 13*, Article 894103. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894103](https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894103)
  61. Stanford, S. (2012). Critically Reflecting on being 'at Risk' and 'a Risk' in Vulnerable People Policing.
  62. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). *Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy.* *Science*, 277(5328), 918–924.
  63. Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). *Juvenile delinquency and urban areas.* University of Chicago Press.
  64. Smylie, C., et al. (2023). Community policing during the pandemic: Adaptations and shifting community concerns. *Carleton Police Research Lab Report*.
  65. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online, 8(2), 23-74.
  66. Siegelaar, A., & Ballard, C. (2023). *Community policing and social crime prevention in the Western Cape: Explaining failure*. Administratio Publica, 31(4), 28–52. [https://doi.org/10.10520/ejc-adminpub\_v31\_n4\_a2](https://doi.org/10.10520/ejc-adminpub_v31_n4_a2)
  67. Scientific Research. (2025). Threshold of community policing in the Philippines. *Scientific Research Publishing (SCIRP)*.
  68. Solar, C. I. (2023). *Determinants of confidence in the police: A multilevel analysis in Brazil*. Canadian Review of Sociology, 60(2), 235–259. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X221079020](https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X221079020)
  69. Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. University of Chicago Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1943-00271-000
  70. Schuck, A. M. (2019). Community policing, coproduction, and social control: Restoring police legitimacy. In Political authority, social control and public policy (pp. 63-77). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2053-769720190000031007
  71. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha.
  72. Tadem, E. C. (2021). *State and Philippine society in the time of the pandemic: Summaries, conclusions, and policy recommendations* (UP CIDS Public Policy Monograph). University of the Philippines Center for Integrative and Development Studies. [https://cids.up.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/UP-CIDS-Public-Policy-Monograph-2021-01-1.pdf](https://cids.up.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/UP-CIDS-Public-Policy-Monograph-2021-01-1.pdf)
  73. Valente, R. R., Beckley, T. M., & Nadeau, S. (2018). *Social vulnerability and community resilience: Understanding local responses to risks and insecurity.
  74. Valente, R., Valera Pertegas, S., & Guàrdia Olmos, J. (2019). A structural equation model estimation of the role of social vulnerability as a predictor of people’s feelings of unsafety. Social Indicators Research, 143(2), 433-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2004-2
  75. Verduzco Chavez, B. (2017). Constructing trust on state-police-community relationships, a problem of institutional design. URVIO Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios de Seguridad, (20), 126-144. https://doi.org/10.17141/URVIO.20.2017.2459
  76. Williams, R., Freeman, C., & Boakye, K. (2024). *Lower social vulnerability is associated with a higher prevalence of social media-involved violent crimes in Prince George’s County, Maryland*. Injury Epidemiology, 11(1), 1–10. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00538 w](https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00538-w) References (all 2020+)Siller, H., & Aydin, N. (2022). Using an intersectional lens on vulnerability and resilience in minority and/or marginalized groups during the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review. *Frontiers in Psychology, 13*, Article 894103. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894103](https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894103)
  77. Weisburd, D. (2024). Are we underestimating the crime prevention outcomes of community policing? *Journal commentary*.
  78. Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). *Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety.* *The Atlantic Monthly*, 249(3), 29–38.
  79. Weis, A. A. (2023). Gender Differences in Rates of Criminal Victimization and Police Response Practices: Basis for Enhanced Crime Solution Efficiency. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2023.v03i10.010
  80. Wisler, D., Monti-Ohannessian, S., & Avila Coya, R. (2021). Impacts of community policing on security: evidence from Mbujimayi in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Police Practice and Research, 22(1), 522-541. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2019.1699409
  81. Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. The Atlantic Monthly, 249(3), 29-38. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b367d3ea2772c73017ac3fb/t/5b84932070a6ad69b44b28d7/1535415091252/BrokenWindows-AtlantaicMonthly-March82.pdf
  82. Yuksel, Y., & Tepe, F. (2013). Citizen satisfaction with police and community policing. European scientific journal, 9(14). ISSN: 1857 – 7881 – e - ISSN 1857- 7431
  83. Zenzile, E., & Magadla, A. F. (2023). The ordeal of police victimization in the Mthatha Policing Cluster, Eastern Cape. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 12(1), 267-274. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i1.2293

This study aimed to develop the best-fit model of social vulnerability among marginalized sectors in Region XII. Specifically, it examined the levels of community policing, public safety and law enforcement, crime prevention strategies, and social vulnerability. The study employed a quantitative research design using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach. A total of 400 respondents from marginalized sectors in Region XII participated in the study. The findings revealed that the levels of community policing, public safety and law enforcement, crime prevention strategies, and social vulnerability were all high. The results also showed significant relationships between community policing and social vulnerability, public safety and law enforcement and social vulnerability, and crime prevention strategies and social vulnerability. Furthermore, community policing and crime prevention strategies significantly influenced social vulnerability, while public safety and law enforcement did not have a significant direct influence. Moreover, the best-fit model revealed that public safety and law enforcement significantly predicts community policing and crime prevention strategies. However, community policing did not significantly predict crime prevention strategies and social vulnerability. Crime prevention strategy emerged as the strongest factor influencing social vulnerability among marginalized sectors. This suggests that strengthening crime prevention programs and preventive community-based initiatives can help reduce vulnerability and improve the safety and well-being of marginalized populations. Finally, the best-fit model of social vulnerability among marginalized sectors was anchored on public safety and law enforcement and crime prevention strategies, with crime prevention strategy serving as the primary pathway influencing social vulnerability.

Keywords : Social Vulnerability, Community Policing, Public Safety and Law Enforcement, Crime Prevention Strategy, Marginalized Sectors, Structural Equation Model, Philippines.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - July - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe