Authors :
Sujay Rao Mandavilli
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 10 - October
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/43uszc49
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26Oct068
Note : A published paper may take 4-5
working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and
ResearchGate.
Abstract :
The objective of this paper is to revisit the ongoing debates and controversies regarding the origin and evolution of humans, and also to evaluate the various pros and cons associated with various versions of the Out of Africa model, and the multiregional hypothesis, given that these are the two major classes of models in common intellectual discourse and debate. We would also like to state and declare emphatically at this juncture that there is inadequate or insufficient evidence to jump to grand conclusions. Instead, the only viable path forward would be to synthesize data from across a wide variety of fields, and develop rock solid and robust interdisciplinary models that can be further refined as more and more data emerges. This approach would serve the best interests of science and scientific progress. We also propose the wholly independent multiregional model, with evolutionary paths taking place across Africa, Europe and Asia, and complex, multiple and divergent ways, with oversimplification posing a major obstacle to scientific progress. We also show that many species from the dawn of life have been universal or near universal, but this may be because different species around the world may be subject to similar evolutionary pressures, and may therefore have pursued similar evolutionary paths. Of course, migrations would always be possible given the scarce fossil records of early humans in Australia, and in North and in South America, but these must be justified on a case to case basis, and must not be beyond the realm of possibility taking into account geographical barriers and technological constraints.
References :
- Envisaging a New Era in Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research: Presenting the COMPASS Model for Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research Sujay Rao Mandavilli1 1Institute for the Study of the Globalization of Science Publication Date: 2025/06/12
- Kara, Helen (2012). Research and Evaluation for Busy Practitioners: A Time-Saving Guide. Bristol: The Policy Press
- McRaney, David (2022). How Minds Change: The Surprising Science of Belief, Opinion, and Persuasion. New York: Portfolio/Penguin
- Gauchat, Gordon William (2008). "A Test of Three Theories of Anti-Science Attitudes". Sociological Focus. 41 (4): 337–357
- Marburger, John Harmen III (10 February 2015). Science policy up close. Crease, Robert P. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
- Bailey GN, Flemming N. 2008. Archaeology of the continental shelf: marine resources, sub merged landscapes and underwater archaeol ogy. Quat Sci Rev 27: 2153–2165. 83 Marean CW. 2014.
- Stringer CB, Finlayson JC, Barton RNE, et al. 2008. Neanderthal exploitation of marine mammals in Gibraltar. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:14319–14324.
- Wolpoff, M.H., Thorne, A.G., Smith, F.H., Frayer, D.W., Pope, G.G., (1994). Multiregional evolution: a world-wide source for modern human populations, In: Nitecki, M.H., Nitecki, D.V. (Eds.), Origins of Modern Humans. Plenum, New York, pp. 175-199. [Proposes that modern humans evolved in Africa,
- Tchernov, E., (1992). Biochronology, paleoecology, and dispersal events of hominids in the southern Levant, In: Akazawa, T., Aoki, K., Kimura, T. (Eds.), The Evolution and Dispersal of Modern Humans in Asia. Hokusen-sha, Tokyo, pp. 149-188. [Describes patterns of mammalian and hominid movements between Africa and southwest Asia].
- Rose, J.I., (2010). New Light on Human Prehistory in the Arabo-Persian Gulf Oasis. Current Anthropology 51, 849-883. [Proposes that early modern humans in the Arabia were able to survive arid conditions by settling around coastal refugia].
- Penny, David; Poole, Anthony (December 1999). "The nature of the last universal common ancestor". Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 9 (6): 672–677
- Hendry, Andrew Paul; Kinnison, Michael T. (November 2001). "An introduction to microevolution: rate, pattern, process". Genetica. 112–113 (1): 1–8
- Orr, H. Allen (February 2005). "The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history". Nature Reviews Genetics. 6 (2): 119–127
- Svensson, Erik I.; Berger, David (1 May 2019). "The Role of Mutation Bias in Adaptive Evolution". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 34 (5): 422–434
- Bernstein H, Byerly HC, Hopf FA, Michod RE. Genetic damage, mutation, and the evolution of sex. Science. 1985 Sep 20;229(4719):1277–81d
- Radick, Gregory (2013). "Darwin and Humans". In Ruse, Michael (ed.). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Darwin and Evolutionary Thought. Cambridge University Press. pp. 173–181.
- East Asians 2.3–2.6%, Western Eurasians 1.8–2.4% (Prüfer K, de Filippo C, Grote S, Mafessoni F, Korlević P, Hajdinjak M, et al. (November 2017)
- Shea, John J. (2003). "Neandertals, competition, and the origin of modern human behavior in the Levant". Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. 12 (4): 173–187
- Walter RC, Buffler RT, Bruggemann JH, Guillaume MM, Berhe SM, Negassi B, et al. (May 2000). "Early human occupation of the Red Sea coast of Eritrea during the last interglacial". Nature. 405 (6782): 65–69
- James HVA, Petraglia M. Modern human origins and the evolution of behavior in the later Pleistocene record of South Asia. Curr Anthropol. 2005; 46(Supplement):S4–S27.
- Petraglia M, Clarkson C, Boivin N, et al. Population increase and environmental deterioration correspond with microlithic innovations in South Asia ca. 35,000 years ago. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009; 106(30):12261–12266. [PubMed: 19620737]
- Abi-Rached, L., Jobin, M.J., Kulkarni, S. 2011. The Shaping of Modern Human Immune Systems by Multiregional Admixture with Archaic Humans. Science 334: 89-94.
- Agoni, L., Golden, A., Guha, C. 2012. Neandertal and Denisovan retroviruses. Current Biology 22: R437-438
- Wolpoff, M. H., & Caspari, R. (1997). Race and Human Evolution. Simon & Schuster
The objective of this paper is to revisit the ongoing debates and controversies regarding the origin and evolution of humans, and also to evaluate the various pros and cons associated with various versions of the Out of Africa model, and the multiregional hypothesis, given that these are the two major classes of models in common intellectual discourse and debate. We would also like to state and declare emphatically at this juncture that there is inadequate or insufficient evidence to jump to grand conclusions. Instead, the only viable path forward would be to synthesize data from across a wide variety of fields, and develop rock solid and robust interdisciplinary models that can be further refined as more and more data emerges. This approach would serve the best interests of science and scientific progress. We also propose the wholly independent multiregional model, with evolutionary paths taking place across Africa, Europe and Asia, and complex, multiple and divergent ways, with oversimplification posing a major obstacle to scientific progress. We also show that many species from the dawn of life have been universal or near universal, but this may be because different species around the world may be subject to similar evolutionary pressures, and may therefore have pursued similar evolutionary paths. Of course, migrations would always be possible given the scarce fossil records of early humans in Australia, and in North and in South America, but these must be justified on a case to case basis, and must not be beyond the realm of possibility taking into account geographical barriers and technological constraints.