Characterization of Noise Pollution in Market Environments Across Abuja Municipal Area Council, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria


Authors : Oludele J. Ayoola; Emmanuel Afeonkhai; Dauda Seth Ayenajeyi

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 5 - May


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/dj4nhv76

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may1228

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : The degree of environmental noise pollution and its potential effects in thirteen (13) of AMAC's primary marketplaces in the Federal Capital Territory of Nigeria, have been analyzed. Noise measurement has been done throughout the mornings, afternoons, and nights to determine noise pollution all over the major markets of AMAC, FCT. Thirteen markets (13) was selected based base on the phases and the level of development; ten are selected from phases 1 and 2, while phase three and four (3and 4) is represented by two (2) because the markets present in the district are either local or just coming up because of the level of development that is still coming up in these places. Other criteria are; markets along heavy and light traffic road, markets that have submerged and other gradually submerging into residential building and the busiest markets in AMAC. The analysis of the noise levels measurement was done for seven (7) days, three (3) times a day (mornings, afternoons and evenings), using Testo 816 Digital sound level meter with accuracy class of two to IEC 60651, precision integrated was employed in order to gather the noise data. The loudest mean levels, 122.1 dB(A), 119.2 dB(A), and 95.1 dB(A), were measured at Gosa Market (GM), Nyanya Market (NM), and Nyanya Market (AM), respectively, in the nights, afternoons, and mornings. This generated a serious health hazards for the merchants and some buyers who stay more than two hours in the market as this results far exceed the acceptable recommended standards of WHO/NESREA. The findings revealed that generators, grinding machines, mobile sellers, vehicular movement, siren from security vehicles, horn from moving vehicles, traffic jams etc. are the sources of noise in the markets. With the exception of Asokoro Modern Market, Garki International Market, and Wuye Ultra-Modern Market, most markets have high levels of noise pollution, which may have an adverse effect on the public's and traders' health. The results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and one sample t-test indicated that there were no appreciable variations in sound levels among the various markets in the research region. Because noise can have physiological and psychological effects on people, governments and environmental managers should enforce laws and implement policies to educate the public about the importance of adopting energy-efficient building techniques like solar energy and other environmentally friendly options that will improve urban livability, such as noise- proofing (power) and retrofitting.

Keywords : Noise, Pollution-Level, Market.

References :

  1. Adejobi, O. S. (2012). Spatio-temporal analysis of noise pollution levels in lagos state: oshodi. Agege Route Experiences, European Journal of globalization and development research, 5 (1): 266-286
  2. Adeoye, N.O. (2012). Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Land Use/Cover Change of Lokoja: A Confluence Town. Journal of Geography and Geology, 4(4): 40- 51.
  3. Ahmad, J., Abbas, A., and Reem, S. (2006). Evaluation of traffic noise pollution. Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 120, 499-525
  4. Amando, G., and Jose V, G., (1998). 24-hours continuos  sound level measurement conducted in spanish urban areas. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 46(4), 159-166
  5. Anieofik, O.Akpan, (2018). Global Journal of Human Social , Geography, Geo-Science, Environmental Science disaster management Vol.18, Issue 1, Version 1.0 Double blind Peer Reviewed International research Journal online ISSN: 2249-460X and Print ISSN: 0975-587X Environment.  
  6. Anomohanran, O. (2013). Evaluation of environmental noise pollution in Abuja, the capital cityOf  Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences, IJRRA 14(2), 470-476
  7. Balogun, O. (2001). The Federal Capital Territory of Nigeria: Geography of Its Development. University of Ibadan Press Limited. Basil Blackwell, New York.
  8. Basner, M., Brink, M., Bristow, A., Kiluizeneer, Y.,Finegold, L., Hong, J., and Sorqust,P.,(2015). ICBEN review of research on the biological effects of noise 2011-  2014. Noise and Health,  17(75), 57-82.
  9. Chauhan, A. (2008). Study of Noise Pollution level in different places of Haridwar and  Dehradun city, India. Environmental Conservation Journal, 9(3): 21-25.
  10. Compendium on Implementation of theFadama III project inFederal Capital Territory (CIFIIIP), (2013);
  11. Encyclopeadia Britannica (2012). Encyclopaedia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica.
  12. Georgiadou, E., Kourfidis, K., and Ziomas, I., (2004). Exploratory traffic noise measurements at five main streets of Thessaloniki, Greec. Global NEST, International Journal (Toronto, ont.) 6(1), 53-61
  13. Gorai, A. K. and Pal, A. K. (2006). Noise and its impact on human being: A review. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering. 7(4), 365-370.
  14. Kiely, G., (1998). Environmental Engineering. McGrac-Hill International
  15. Olayinka O. S. and Abdullahi S. A., (2008). A statistical analysis of the day-time and night-time noise levels in Ilorin Metropolis, Nigeria, Trends in Applied Sciences Research, 3(3): 253-266 (2008).
  16. Oloruntoba E.O., Ademola R.A., Sridhar M. K. C., Agbola S.A,. Omokhodion F.O., and  Ana G.R.E.E., and Alabi R. A., (2012). African Journal of biomedical Research Vol. 15(may, 2012); 77-84 
  17. Oyedepo, S. O. (2013). Effective noise Control measures and sustainable development in Nigeria. World Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1(1), 5-15. 
  18. Ozer, S., Zengin, M. and Yilmaz, H. (2014). Determination of the noise pollution on University (Education) campuses: a case study of Ataturk University. EkolojiDergisi, 23(90), 49-54.
  19. Panadya G.H. (2003). Assessment of traffic noise and its impact on community. International  Journal of environmental studies, 60(6), 595-602.
  20. Ugbebor, J. N., Yorkor B., and Nwogu J.N., (2017). Evaluation of noise levels in oil mill markets And its environs, Port Harcourt Nigeria, British Journal of Applied Science and Technology 21(1): 1-11, 2017; Article no.BJAST.33248 ISSN: 2231-0843, NLM ID: 101664541
  21. Zannin, P. H. T., Calixto, A., Diniz, F., and Ferreira J. A. C. ( 2002). Survey of urban noise Annoyance in a large Brazilian city: The importance of subjective analysis in conjunction with objective analysis. Environmental Assessment Impact Review, 22, 245-255.
  22. Zannin, P. H. T., Ferreria A. M. C. and Szeremetta, B. (2006). Evaluation of noise pollution  In Urban parks. Environment Monitoring Assessment, 118, 423-433.
  23. Zeid, Q.,She, M., and Abdel-Razia, I. R. (2000). Measurement of the noise pollution in the  Community of Araba. Acoustica, 86, 376-378

The degree of environmental noise pollution and its potential effects in thirteen (13) of AMAC's primary marketplaces in the Federal Capital Territory of Nigeria, have been analyzed. Noise measurement has been done throughout the mornings, afternoons, and nights to determine noise pollution all over the major markets of AMAC, FCT. Thirteen markets (13) was selected based base on the phases and the level of development; ten are selected from phases 1 and 2, while phase three and four (3and 4) is represented by two (2) because the markets present in the district are either local or just coming up because of the level of development that is still coming up in these places. Other criteria are; markets along heavy and light traffic road, markets that have submerged and other gradually submerging into residential building and the busiest markets in AMAC. The analysis of the noise levels measurement was done for seven (7) days, three (3) times a day (mornings, afternoons and evenings), using Testo 816 Digital sound level meter with accuracy class of two to IEC 60651, precision integrated was employed in order to gather the noise data. The loudest mean levels, 122.1 dB(A), 119.2 dB(A), and 95.1 dB(A), were measured at Gosa Market (GM), Nyanya Market (NM), and Nyanya Market (AM), respectively, in the nights, afternoons, and mornings. This generated a serious health hazards for the merchants and some buyers who stay more than two hours in the market as this results far exceed the acceptable recommended standards of WHO/NESREA. The findings revealed that generators, grinding machines, mobile sellers, vehicular movement, siren from security vehicles, horn from moving vehicles, traffic jams etc. are the sources of noise in the markets. With the exception of Asokoro Modern Market, Garki International Market, and Wuye Ultra-Modern Market, most markets have high levels of noise pollution, which may have an adverse effect on the public's and traders' health. The results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and one sample t-test indicated that there were no appreciable variations in sound levels among the various markets in the research region. Because noise can have physiological and psychological effects on people, governments and environmental managers should enforce laws and implement policies to educate the public about the importance of adopting energy-efficient building techniques like solar energy and other environmentally friendly options that will improve urban livability, such as noise- proofing (power) and retrofitting.

Keywords : Noise, Pollution-Level, Market.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe