Authors :
Dr. Bappa Mondal
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 5 - May
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/5n934f7r
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/2kv5nd43
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26May734
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Floodplains represent highly productive yet environmentally vulnerable landscapes because of their dynamic
geomorphic processes and recurring hydrological disturbances. The present micro-level study investigates the changing
nature of agriculture and rural livelihoods under the influence of recurrent flooding and flood-induced sand deposition in
Guptipara Char Mouza of the lower Bhagirathi floodplain, West Bengal, India. The study analyses spatio-temporal flood
characteristics, sand-splay deposition, land-use transformation, agricultural change, socio-economic vulnerability, and
livelihood adaptation between the agricultural years 1999–2000, 2012–2013, and 2025–2026. Both primary and secondary
data sources were used. Household surveys, farmer perception analysis, plot-wise land-use surveys, GPS-based field
investigation, and satellite image interpretation using Google Earth Pro imagery (2015 and 2025) formed the major
methodological basis of the study. Several agricultural indices, including Cropping Intensity, Gibbs–Martin Crop
Diversification Index, Overall Yield Index (Shafi, 1972), Enyedi Crop Productivity Index, and Volume of Change in Crop
Cultivation Index, were applied to measure agricultural transformation. The results reveal that the floods of 2000, 2007, and
2015 caused severe inundation and extensive sand-splay deposition across the study area. The flood of 2000 affected almost
the entire mouza, whereas the flood extent gradually declined in later years due to partial embankment strengthening and
local adaptation measures. Sand deposition significantly reduced soil fertility, altered soil texture, and negatively affected
traditional crop cultivation, particularly Boro paddy. Consequently, agricultural diversification increased gradually, while
orchard farming, especially mango cultivation, emerged as a major adaptive strategy in sand-affected areas. Land-use and
land-cover analysis indicates a decline in traditional agricultural land and a rapid increase in orchard area and settlement
expansion between 2015 and 2025. Occupational diversification also increased substantially as households shifted from
cultivation toward agricultural labour, business, transportation, textile work, service activities, and seasonal migration. The
study demonstrates that recurrent flood hazards and geomorphic disturbances have fundamentally transformed the
agricultural economy and livelihood structure of the lower Bhagirathi floodplain. Sustainable floodplain management
therefore requires integrated river management, scientific sediment-control measures, climate-resilient agricultural
planning, community-based adaptation strategies, and improved rural livelihood support systems.
Keywords :
Sand-Splay Deposition; Rural Livelihood; Crop Diversification; Agricultural Transformation; Bhagirathi Floodplain; Farmer Perception Study.
References :
- Junk, W.J., Bayley, P.B., Sparks, R.E. (1989). The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 106, 110–127.
- Tockner, K., Stanford, J.A. (2002). Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends. Environmental Conservation, 29(3), 308–330. https://doi.org/10.1017/S037689290200022X
- Sinha, R., Jain, V. (1998). Flood hazards of north Bihar rivers, Indo-Gangetic plains. Natural Hazards, 17, 147–172. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008032427067
- Rudra, K. (2018). Rivers of the Ganga-Brahmaputra-Meghna Delta. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76529-2
- Adger, W.N., Hughes, T.P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S.R., Rockström, J. (2005). Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science, 309, 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1112122
- IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
- Thakkar, M.G., Goyal, R.K., Maurya, D.M. (2006). Sand splays associated with Kosi River flooding. Current Science, 91(12), 1656–1659.
- Islam, M.R., Hasan, M., Khan, N.I. (2018). Flood hazards and agricultural vulnerability in floodplain areas of Bangladesh. Environmental Systems Research, 7, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-018-0112-5
- Sanyal, J., Lu, X.X. (2005). Remote sensing and GIS-based flood vulnerability assessment of the Gangetic West Bengal. Hydrological Processes, 19, 3699–3716. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5852
- Mukhopadhyay, A. (2010). The changing morphology of Bhagirathi-Hooghly River. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 75, 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-010-0020-5
- Sarkar, S., Mondal, P., Ghosh, A. (2012). Flood hazard in lower Bhagirathi basin. Indian Journal of Geography and Environment, 11, 44–56.
- Das, S., Bandyopadhyay, J., Roy, S. (2019). River dynamics and floodplain changes in lower Ganga basin. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 12, 511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4652-1
- Chakraborty, T., Mukhopadhyay, S. (2015). Sand casting and agricultural transformation in lower Gangetic floodplain. Spatial Information Research, 23, 573–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-015-0056-3
- Banerjee, S. (2015). Flood vulnerability and agrarian distress in eastern India. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(3), 45–53.
- Jha, V.C., Bairagya, H. (2007). Floods and livelihood vulnerability in Bihar floodplains. Annals of the National Association of Geographers, India, 27(1), 55–69.
- Islam, S.N., Walkerden, G. (2015). How bonding and bridging networks contribute to disaster resilience and recovery on the Bangladeshi coast. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 10, 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.09.016
- Ellis, F. (2000). Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. Oxford University Press.
- Habiba, U., Shaw, R., Takeuchi, Y. (2012). Farmer’s perception and adaptation practices to cope with drought. Climate, 1, 72–89. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli1010072
- Deb, P., Babel, M.S., Das Gupta, A. (2016). Adaptation to climate change in agriculture. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 123, 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-014-1351-6
- Ghosh, S., Kar, N.S. (2018). Floodplain dynamics and environmental vulnerability in lower Ganga basin. Geocarto International, 33(6), 620–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2017.1284348
- Ghosh, A., Mistri, B. (2021). Agricultural adaptation and flood resilience in West Bengal. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 14621–14642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01264-7
- Roy, P.S., Roy, A., Joshi, P.K. (2015). Geospatial analysis for land use dynamics. Current Science, 108(10), 1900–1911.
- Singh, R.B., Kumar, A. (2018). GIS and remote sensing applications in floodplain mapping. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2890-8
- Birthal, P.S., Roy, D., Negi, D.S. (2015). Assessing the impact of crop diversification. Food Policy, 57, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.09.005
- Brouwer, R., Akter, S., Brander, L., Haque, E. (2007). Socioeconomic vulnerability and adaptation to environmental risk. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 12, 805–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-9040-3
- Shah, T. (2009). Taming the Anarchy: Groundwater Governance in South Asia. Resources for the Future Press.
- Mukherji, A., Shah, T., Verma, S. (2012). Groundwater governance in India. Hydrogeology Journal, 20, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-011-0795-9
- Tilman, D., Cassman, K.G., Matson, P.A. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 418, 671–677. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01014
- Foley, J.A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K.A. (2011). Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478, 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452
- Paul, S.K., Routray, J.K. (2011). Household response to cyclone and flood disasters. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(9), 2240–2249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.04.017
- Gibbs, J.P., Martin, W.T. (1962). Urbanization and diversification. American Sociological Review, 27(5), 667–677.
- Shafi, M. (1972). Measurement of agricultural productivity. Indian Geographical Review, 34(1), 45–56.
- Enyedi, G. (1964). Measurement of agricultural productivity. Geographical Studies, 3, 23–34.
- Singh, J., Dhillon, S.S. (1984). Agricultural Geography. Tata McGraw-Hill.
- Sinha, R. (2009). The Great Avulsion of Kosi River. Current Science, 97(3), 429–433.
- Mukhopadhyay, A., Pal, S., Ghosh, S. (2016). Floodplain geomorphology of lower Bhagirathi basin. Journal of Earth System Science, 125, 1447–1460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-016-0745-0
- Mandal, M., Zhang, J. (2018). Climate adaptation in flood-prone agriculture. Sustainability, 10(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030798
- Thakkar, M.G., Desai, B.G., Chamyal, L.S. (2017). Floodplain dynamics in India. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 152, 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.11.014
- Chakraborty, S., Das, P., Ghosh, S. (2020). Sediment deposition and agricultural land degradation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192, 515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08492-0
- Adger, W.N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
- Roy, K., Saha, S., Banerjee, P. (2020). Agricultural diversification in flood-prone West Bengal. Journal of Rural Development, 39(2), 155–176.
- Singh, R.P., Singh, S., Pathak, C. (2014). Horticultural transformation in flood affected plains. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 27, 57–68.
- FAO. (2017). Climate Smart Agriculture Sourcebook. Food and Agriculture Organization.
- UNDP. (2019). Human Development Report 2019. United Nations Development Programme.
- World Bank. (2021). Climate Risk Country Profile: India. World Bank Group.
- IPBES. (2019). Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.
- UNESCO. (2020). Water and Climate Change Report.
- UNEP. (2021). Adaptation Gap Report 2021.
- Government of West Bengal. (2024). District Statistical Handbook: Hooghly.
- Census of India. (2011). District Census Handbook: Hooghly.
- Government of India. (2023). Agricultural Statistics at a Glance.
- FAO. (2020). Flood Management and Agricultural Resilience.
- NOAA. (2021). Climate Variability and Extreme Rainfall Events.
- WMO. (2022). State of the Global Climate 2022.
- OECD. (2020). Climate Resilience in Agriculture.
Floodplains represent highly productive yet environmentally vulnerable landscapes because of their dynamic
geomorphic processes and recurring hydrological disturbances. The present micro-level study investigates the changing
nature of agriculture and rural livelihoods under the influence of recurrent flooding and flood-induced sand deposition in
Guptipara Char Mouza of the lower Bhagirathi floodplain, West Bengal, India. The study analyses spatio-temporal flood
characteristics, sand-splay deposition, land-use transformation, agricultural change, socio-economic vulnerability, and
livelihood adaptation between the agricultural years 1999–2000, 2012–2013, and 2025–2026. Both primary and secondary
data sources were used. Household surveys, farmer perception analysis, plot-wise land-use surveys, GPS-based field
investigation, and satellite image interpretation using Google Earth Pro imagery (2015 and 2025) formed the major
methodological basis of the study. Several agricultural indices, including Cropping Intensity, Gibbs–Martin Crop
Diversification Index, Overall Yield Index (Shafi, 1972), Enyedi Crop Productivity Index, and Volume of Change in Crop
Cultivation Index, were applied to measure agricultural transformation. The results reveal that the floods of 2000, 2007, and
2015 caused severe inundation and extensive sand-splay deposition across the study area. The flood of 2000 affected almost
the entire mouza, whereas the flood extent gradually declined in later years due to partial embankment strengthening and
local adaptation measures. Sand deposition significantly reduced soil fertility, altered soil texture, and negatively affected
traditional crop cultivation, particularly Boro paddy. Consequently, agricultural diversification increased gradually, while
orchard farming, especially mango cultivation, emerged as a major adaptive strategy in sand-affected areas. Land-use and
land-cover analysis indicates a decline in traditional agricultural land and a rapid increase in orchard area and settlement
expansion between 2015 and 2025. Occupational diversification also increased substantially as households shifted from
cultivation toward agricultural labour, business, transportation, textile work, service activities, and seasonal migration. The
study demonstrates that recurrent flood hazards and geomorphic disturbances have fundamentally transformed the
agricultural economy and livelihood structure of the lower Bhagirathi floodplain. Sustainable floodplain management
therefore requires integrated river management, scientific sediment-control measures, climate-resilient agricultural
planning, community-based adaptation strategies, and improved rural livelihood support systems.
Keywords :
Sand-Splay Deposition; Rural Livelihood; Crop Diversification; Agricultural Transformation; Bhagirathi Floodplain; Farmer Perception Study.