Change Management Strategies and Educational Innovation in Sta. Maria West District


Authors : James Cobourn B. Ejercito

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 5 - May


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/ykc9den4

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may1979

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This descriptive-correlational study surveyed 100 public elementary school teachers from Sta. Maria District using a structured questionnaire adapted from established literature. The instrument measured perceptions of change management strategies—communication, teacher involvement, resource provision, and evaluation feedback—and the extent of educational innovation, including innovative teaching methods and technological adoption. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression. Descriptive analysis revealed that the overall extent of change management strategies was rated as Extensive, while educational innovation was also rated as Extensive). The findings indicate a moderate, statistically significant positive correlation between change management strategies and educational innovation, with approximately 21.3 percent of the variance in innovation explained by change management practices. Moreover, regression analysis demonstrated that teacher involvement, provision of necessary resources, and evaluation/feedback mechanisms significantly predicted educational innovation, whereas communication and dissemination of information did not emerge as a significant predictor. Aligning institutional change management efforts with these key factors can lead to more effective teaching practices, improved learning experiences, and sustainable reform within s. Sta. Maria West District.

Keywords : Change Management Strategies, Educational Innovation, Teacher Involvement, Sta. Maria West District

References :

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
  2. Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., & Wallace, M. (2016). Creating and sustaining professional learning communities [Online]. Routledge. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781317265003
  3. Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., & Grunow, A. (2016). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better [Online]. Harvard Education Press. Available: https://hepg.org/hep-home/books/learning-to-improve
  4. Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., & Grunow, A. (2021). Getting ideas into action: Building networked improvement communities in education [Online]. Harvard Education Press. Available: https://hepg.org/hep-home/books/getting-ideas-into-action
  5. Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., & Grunow, A. (2021). Getting ideas into action: Building networked improvement communities in education. Stanford University Press.
  6. Clarke, W. M., & Hyde, A. (2019). Change management in higher education: A study of academic and administrative leaders' perspectives. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(1), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1535850
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
  8. Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2016). Flattening the hierarchy of evidence for effective education [Online]. American
  9. Educator, 39(1), 17-23. Available: https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/ae_winter2016_darling-hammond.pdf
  10. Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2019). Teacher learning: What matters? Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46-53.
  11. Davies, R. S., & West, R. E. (2019). Technology integration in schools. In M. J. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (5th ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_43
  12. Davis, N. (2023). Education 3.0: Embracing technology to give every child the best start in life [Online]. Routledge. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781135091068
  13. DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2016). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work (3rd ed.) [Online]. Solution Tree. Available: https://www.solutiontree.com/free-resources/learning-by-doing-third-edition.html
  14. Elmore, R. F., & Burney, D. (2016). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement in community school district #2, New York City [Online]. Consortium for Policy
  15. Research in Education. Available: https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/25031/412899-Investing-in-Teacher-Learning-Staff-Development-and-Instructional-Improvement-in-Community-School-District-2-New-York-City.PDF
  16. Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2010). Classroom innovations that work: Research-based strategies for the classroom (2nd ed.) [Survey instrument]. Retrieved from https://www.ascd.org/Publications/Books/Overview/Classroom-Innovations-That-Work-Research-Based-Strategies-for-the-Classroom-2nd-edition
  17. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2015). How to design and evaluate research in education (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  18. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
  19. Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
  20. Fullan, M. (2017). The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. Wiley. Available: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/The+Principal%3A+Three+Keys+to+Maximizing+Impact-p-9781119422300
  21. Fullan, M. (2019). Nuance: Why some leaders succeed and others fail. Corwin.
  22. Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems [Online]. Corwin. Available: https://us.corwin.com/en-us/nam/coherence/book250548
  23. Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems [Online]. Corwin. Available: https://us.corwin.com/en-us/nam/coherence/book250548 (Duplicate Entry)
  24. Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2020). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems (2nd ed.). Corwin.
  25. Garcia, A., et al. (2020). Leadership communication styles and change management: Insights from academic institutions. Journal of Educational Leadership, 17(3), 78-92.
  26. Halbert, J., Kaser, L., & Timperley, H. (2024). A framework for transforming learning in schools: Innovation and the spiral of inquiry [Online]. NZCER Press. Available: https://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/Framework%20for%20Transforming%20Learning%20in%20Schools%20WEB_0.pdf
  27. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2015). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (4th ed.). Pearson.
  28. Hallinger, P. (2019). Bringing leadership to learning: Teacher leadership for the 21st century [Online]. Springer. Available: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319788102
  29. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
  30. Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2020). Leading professional learning with impact: Evidence-based practices to improve outcomes. School Leadership & Management, 40(3-4), 218–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1686995
  31. Hattie, J. (2017). Visible learning: Feedback [Online]. Routledge. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315307553
  32. Jerald, C. D., & Van Heusden, D. (2019). Building trust to promote educational improvement. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Retrieved from https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/resources/publications/building-trust-to-promote-educational-improvement/
  33. Johnson, T., et al. (2019). Professional development and teacher readiness for change: Implications for school improvement. Journal of Educational Leadership, 16(2), 89-104.
  34. Johnson, T., et al. (2019). Resource allocation and organizational culture: Drivers of change management success in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(3), 321-335.
  35. Koehler, M. J. (2024). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/22929926_Technological_Pedagogical_Content_Knowledge_A_Framework_for_Teacher_Knowledge
  36. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? [Online]. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70. Available: https://www.citejournal.org/volume-9/issue-1-09/general/what-is-technological-pedagogicalcontent-knowledge/
  37. Kools, M., & Stoll, L. (2019). What makes a school a learning organisation? A guide for policy makers, school leaders and teachers. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264309751-en
  38. Leithwood, K., & Seashore Louis, K. (2022). Linking leadership to student learning (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  39. Martin, F., Polly, D., Coles, S., & Wang, C. (2020). Examining higher education faculty use of current digital technologies: Importance, competence, and motivation. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 32(1), 73–86. Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/
  40. McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2019). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(3), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1612037
  41. Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., & Liou, Y.-H. (2020). Networked leadership in action: Relationship brokers in changing district and school contexts. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(6), 612–627. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2020-0038
  42. OECD. (2020). Back to the future of education: Four OECD scenarios for schooling. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/178ef527-en
  43. Puentedura, R. (2020). SAMR: A brief introduction [Online]. Available: http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/06/29/SAMRBriefIntroduction.pdf
  44. Reyes, M., & Cruz, R. (2019). Leadership support and teacher involvement in change processes: Perspectives from Philippine educational institutions. Educational Change and Reform, 28(2), 189-204.
  45. Reyes, M., & Cruz, R. (2019). Organizational culture and communication practices during change: Perspectives from Philippine educational settings. Educational Change and Reform, 26(2), 215-230.
  46. Reyes, M., & Cruz, R. (2020). Time allocation and teacher adjustment to change: Perspectives from Philippine educational institutions. Educational Change and Reform, 27(3), 345-360.
  47. Reyes, M., & Garcia, B. (2020). Evaluation and feedback mechanisms in driving sustainable change: Lessons from Philippine academic institutions. Educational Change and Reform, 25(4), 567-582.
  48. Roblyer, M. D., & Doering, A. H. (2014). Integrating educational technology into teaching (7th ed.) [Online]. Pearson. Available: https://www.pearson.com/store/p/integrating-educational-technology-into-teaching/P100001311387
  49. Rogers, E. M. (2023). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  50. Salazar-Clemeña, R. M., & Almonte-Acosta, S. A. (2007). Developing research culture in Philippine higher education institutions: Perspectives of university faculty. UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge.
  51. Santos, A., et al. (2021). Collaborative resource provision for change initiatives: Insights from academic institutions. Educational Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 432-448.
  52. Santos, A., et al. (2022). Training and resources for teacher involvement in change processes: Evidence from academic institutions. Educational Innovation Quarterly, 29(4), 567-582.
  53. Sarason, S. B. (2015). Revisiting "The culture of the school and the problem of change" [Online]. Teachers College Press. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281964425_Revisiting_
  54. The_Culture_of_the_School_and_the_Problem_of_Change
  55. Sarason, S. B. (2016). Revisiting "The culture of the school and the problem of change". Teachers College Press.
  56. Spector, M. J. (2024). Foundations of educational technology: Integrative approaches and interdisciplinary perspectives [Online]. Routledge. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781135616561
  57. Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2019). The research methods knowledge base (3rd ed.). Atomic Dog Publishing.
  58. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (2015). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform [Online]. Harvard University Press. Available: https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674049576
  59. West, M. A. (2016). Effective teamwork: Practical lessons from organizational research (3rd ed.) [Online]. Wiley-Blackwell. Available: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Effective+Teamwork%3A+Practical+Lessons+from+Organizational+Research%2C+3rd+Edition-p-9781118905636
  60. West, M. A. (2022). Effective teamwork: Practical lessons from organizational research (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

This descriptive-correlational study surveyed 100 public elementary school teachers from Sta. Maria District using a structured questionnaire adapted from established literature. The instrument measured perceptions of change management strategies—communication, teacher involvement, resource provision, and evaluation feedback—and the extent of educational innovation, including innovative teaching methods and technological adoption. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression. Descriptive analysis revealed that the overall extent of change management strategies was rated as Extensive, while educational innovation was also rated as Extensive). The findings indicate a moderate, statistically significant positive correlation between change management strategies and educational innovation, with approximately 21.3 percent of the variance in innovation explained by change management practices. Moreover, regression analysis demonstrated that teacher involvement, provision of necessary resources, and evaluation/feedback mechanisms significantly predicted educational innovation, whereas communication and dissemination of information did not emerge as a significant predictor. Aligning institutional change management efforts with these key factors can lead to more effective teaching practices, improved learning experiences, and sustainable reform within s. Sta. Maria West District.

Keywords : Change Management Strategies, Educational Innovation, Teacher Involvement, Sta. Maria West District

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe