Bridge Failures and their Causes: A Narrative Review of Structural, Environmental, and Human Factors


Authors : Jamiu Lateef; Imran Muhammed Awwal

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 1 - January


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yc8hzbpu

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/5n7btxd5

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jan096

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Bridges are critical components of transportation networks, yet catastrophic collapses continue to occur, sometimes in structures that were previously judged acceptable by conventional inspection and evaluation practices. This narrative review synthesizes bridge failure mechanisms reported between 1970 and 2024 and organizes them into structural, environmental, and human-organizational domains. The synthesis indicates that environmental hazards frequently act as the immediate trigger, with hydraulic scour repeatedly emerging as a dominant initiating mechanism, while severe outcomes are often enabled by latent vulnerabilities such as deterioration, limited redundancy, constructability and inspectability limitations, and gaps in inspection, communication, and maintenance decision-making. By integrating failure case evidence with reliability and lifecycle perspectives, the review highlights how capacity declines over time can intersect with changing demands and extreme events, increasing the likelihood of rapid, disproportionate collapse. The paper also discusses climate non-stationarity as a growing challenge for hazard characterization and emphasizes opportunities for proactive asset management through enhanced monitoring, data integration, and decision-support tools. The proposed synthesis framework supports more consistent failure attribution and informs strategies for resilient design, inspection planning, and risk-based maintenance policy.

Keywords : Bridge Failure; Bridge Collapse; Forensic Engineering; Scour; Fatigue and Fracture; Corrosion; Asset Management.

References :

  1. Federal Highway Administration, “National Bridge Inventory (NBI) element inspection data (as of 2025)”, U.S. Department of Transportation. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/.
  2. American Road & Transportation Builders Association, “2023 Bridge Report: Progress and challenges for America's bridges”, ARTBA. https://artbabridgereport.org/reports/2023-ARTBA-Bridge-Report.pdf.
  3. K. Wardhana and F. C. Hadipriono, “Analysis of recent bridge failures in the United States”, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 17(3), 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2003)17:3(144).
  4. L. Deng, W. Wang, and Y. Yu, “State-of-the-art review of causes and mechanisms of bridge collapse”, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 30(2), 04015005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000731, 2016.
  5. D. Proske, “Bridge Collapse Frequencies Versus Failure Probabilities”, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73833-8, 2018.
  6. J. Reason, “Human Error”, Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/highereducation/books/human-error/281486994DE4704203A514F7B7D826C0, 1990.
  7. M. J. Page, J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. C. Hoffmann, and C. D. Mulrow, “The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews”, BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71, 2021.
  8. H. Arksey and L. O'Malley, “Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework”, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616, 2005.
  9. D. Levac, H. Colquhoun, and K. K. O'Brien, “Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology”, Implementation Science, 5, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69, 2010.
  10. A. C. Tricco, E. Lillie, W. Zarin, K. K. O'Brien, H. Colquhoun, and D. Levac, “PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation”, Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850, 2018.
  11. J. Scheer, “Failed Bridges: Case Studies, Causes and Consequences”, Ernst & Sohn (Wiley). https://doi.org/10.1002/9783433600634, 2010.
  12. E. V. Richardson and S. R. Davis, “Evaluating scour at bridges (Hydraulic Engineering Circular No”, 18, 4th ed.). Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/50281/dot_50281_DS1.pdf, 2001.
  13. B. W. Melville and S. E. Coleman, “Bridge Scour”, Water Resources Publications. https://www.wrpllc.com/books/bsr.html, 2000.
  14. B. M. Imam and M. K. Chryssanthopoulos, “Causes and consequences of metallic bridge failures”, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 8(2), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2010.504852, 2012.
  15. N. Leveson, “Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety”, MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8179.001.0001, 2012.
  16. U. Starossek, “Progressive Collapse of Structures”, Thomas Telford. https://doi.org/10.1680/pcos.36109, 2009.
  17. National Transportation Safety Board, “Collapse of I-35W Highway Bridge, Minneapolis, Minnesota, August 1, 2007 (NTSB/HAR-08/03)”, https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/HAR0803.pdf, 2008.
  18. M. P. Enright and D. M. Frangopol, “Service-life prediction of deteriorating concrete bridges”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 124(3), 309-317. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:3(309).
  19. National Transportation Safety Board, “Collapse of the Fern Hollow Bridge, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, January 28, 2022 (NTSB/HIR-24/02)”, National Transportation Safety Board. https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/HIR2402.pdf, 2024.
  20. J. W. Fisher, “Fatigue and Fracture in Steel Bridges: Case Studies”, John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com/books/about/Fatigue_and_Fracture_in_Steel_Bridges.html?id=FS9SAAAAMAAJ, 1984.
  21. National Transportation Safety Board, “Pedestrian bridge collapse over SW 8th Street, Miami, Florida, March 15, 2018 (NTSB/HAR-19/02)”, https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/HAR1902.pdf, 2019.
  22. B. M. Ayyub, “Risk Analysis in Engineering and Economics (2nd ed.)”, Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16663, 2014.
  23. Federal Highway Administration, “Evaluating scour at bridges (Hydraulic Engineering Circular No”, 18, 5th ed.). U.S. Department of Transportation. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42053/dot_42053_DS1.pdf, 2012.
  24. W. Cook, P. J. Barr, and M. W. Halling, “Bridge failure rate”, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 29(3), 04014080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000571, 2015.
  25. M. Bruneau, S. E. Chang, R. T. Eguchi, G. C. Lee, T. D. O'Rourke, A. M. Reinhorn, M. Shinozuka, K. Tierney, W. A. Wallace, and D. Winterfeldt, “A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities”, Earthquake Spectra, 19(4), 733-752. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497, 2003.
  26. K. Y. Billah and R. H. Scanlan, “Resonance, Tacoma Narrows Bridge failure, and undergraduate physics textbooks”, American Journal of Physics, 59(2), 118-124. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16590, 1991.
  27. E. Simiu and R. H. Scanlan, “Wind Effects on Structures: Fundamentals and Applications to Design (3rd ed.)”, John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com/books/about/Winds_Effects_on_Structures.html?id=DcSZTIMZObEC, 1996.
  28. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, “Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis”, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.
  29. Transportation Research Board, “Potential Impacts of Climate Change on U.S”, Transportation (Special Report 290). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12179, 2008.
  30. P. Milillo, “Pre-collapse space geodetic observations of critical infrastructure: The Morandi Bridge, Genoa, Italy”, Remote Sensing, 11(12), 1403. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11121403, 2019.
  31. M. Domaneschi, “Collapse analysis of the Polcevera viaduct by the applied element method”, Engineering Structures, 214, 110659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110659.
  32. M. Morgese, “Post-collapse analysis of Morandi's Polcevera viaduct in Genoa, Italy”, Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 10, 257-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-019-00370-7, 2020.
  33. K. Rymsza, “Potential causes of the Polcevera Viaduct collapse in Genoa, Italy”, Applied Sciences, 11(17), 8098. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178098, 2021.
  34. P. Clemente, “Foreword: Special issue on Morandi Bridge collapse”, Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 10, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-020-00384-6, 2020.
  35. Z. Sun, “A critical review for trustworthy and explainable structural health monitoring and risk prognosis of bridges with human-in-the-loop”, Sustainability, 15(19), 14134. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914134, 2023.

Bridges are critical components of transportation networks, yet catastrophic collapses continue to occur, sometimes in structures that were previously judged acceptable by conventional inspection and evaluation practices. This narrative review synthesizes bridge failure mechanisms reported between 1970 and 2024 and organizes them into structural, environmental, and human-organizational domains. The synthesis indicates that environmental hazards frequently act as the immediate trigger, with hydraulic scour repeatedly emerging as a dominant initiating mechanism, while severe outcomes are often enabled by latent vulnerabilities such as deterioration, limited redundancy, constructability and inspectability limitations, and gaps in inspection, communication, and maintenance decision-making. By integrating failure case evidence with reliability and lifecycle perspectives, the review highlights how capacity declines over time can intersect with changing demands and extreme events, increasing the likelihood of rapid, disproportionate collapse. The paper also discusses climate non-stationarity as a growing challenge for hazard characterization and emphasizes opportunities for proactive asset management through enhanced monitoring, data integration, and decision-support tools. The proposed synthesis framework supports more consistent failure attribution and informs strategies for resilient design, inspection planning, and risk-based maintenance policy.

Keywords : Bridge Failure; Bridge Collapse; Forensic Engineering; Scour; Fatigue and Fracture; Corrosion; Asset Management.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe