Authors : Dr. Vitika Rawal; Dr. Renuka Pawar; Dr. Chanamallappa R. Ganiger; Dr. Sandesh Phaphe; Dr. Yusuf A. Ronad; Dr. Pratap Mane; Dr. Seema Patil

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 10 - October

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3yrm56tj

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26Oct1612

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Cleft lip and palate (CLP) represent a major group of congenital craniofacial conditions that require coordinated, long-term care involving multiple healthcare specialties. The increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in dentistry and orthodontics has opened new avenues for addressing the diagnostic and therapeutic complexities associated with cleft management. This narrative review examines the evolving applications of AI throughout the CLP treatment pathway, highlighting its potential contributions to clinical assessment, treatment planning, and outcome evaluation. The review considers seven key areas in which AI-based technologies may support cleft care. These include the identification of cleft anomalies from prenatal ultrasound and photographic images using deep learning algorithms; computer-assisted planning and digital fabrication of nasoalveolar molding appliances; automated localization of cephalometric landmarks in patients with atypical craniofacial structures; three-dimensional assessment and segmentation of alveolar bone grafts using conebeam computed tomography (CBCT); radiographic identification of dental abnormalities frequently associated with CLP; predictive modelling of orthognathic surgical requirements and postoperative facial soft-tissue changes; and computerized analysis of speech patterns associated with velopharyngeal dysfunction. Research in these areas suggests that AI may improve the efficiency and consistency of diagnostic procedures, facilitate quantitative analysis, and assist clinicians in complex treatment decisions. However, the translation of these technologies into routine clinical practice remains challenging. Important barriers include limited sample sizes, inadequate representation of patient populations, insufficient validation across independent clinical settings, the possibility of algorithmic bias, and ethical issues related to patient data protection and professional accountability. For orthodontists involved in cleft care, AI offers opportunities to enhance clinical decision-making and streamline selected aspects of treatment. Nevertheless, its outputs must be interpreted in conjunction with comprehensive clinical examination, patient-specific findings, and multidisciplinary expertise. Future research should prioritize larger and more diverse datasets, independent clinical validation, transparent reporting, and evaluation of real-world patient outcomes to establish the reliability and clinical value of AI-assisted approaches in CLP management.

Keywords : Cleft Lip and Palate, Alveolar Bone Grafting, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Cleft Lip & Palate, Cleft Orthodontics, Cleft Pediatric Oral Health, Craniofacial Growth and Development, Nasoalveolar Molding (Nam), Orthognathic Surgey, Plastic Surgergy, Prenatal Detection.

References :

1. Santiago PE, Grayson BH: Role of the craniofacial orthodontist on the cleft palate and craniofacial team .Semin Orthod. 2009, 15:225-43. 10.1053/j.sodo.2009.07.004
2. Thurzo A, Urbanová W, Novák B, et al.: Where is the artificial intelligence applied in dentistry? Systematic review and literature analysis. Healthcare :1269. 10.3390/healthcare10071269
3. Almoammar KA: Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence in cleft lip and palate: an in-depth analysis from diagnosis to treatment, a comprehensive review. Children :140. 10.3390/children11020140
4. Long RE Jr, Semb G, Shaw WC: Orthodontic treatment of the patient with complete clefts of lip, alveolus,and palate: lessons of the past 60 years. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000, 37:533. 10.1597/15451569_2000_037_0533_ototpw_2.0.co_2
5. Alam MK, Alfawzan AA: Characteristics of Different Types of Cleft and Non-cleft Individuals. . Front Cell Dev Biol.. 2020, 8:789. 10.3389/fcell.2020.00789
6. Rossell-Perry P: Atlas of surgical repair for cleft lip, palate and associated nasal deformities . Berlin: Springer. 2020,
7. Patel P, El-Mangoush A, Amin A, Ahmad M: The accuracy and speed of artificial intelligent cephalometric software compared to computer and paper tracing in patients with cleft lip and palate. Br Dent J. 2025,10.1038/s41415-025-8877-y
8. Ravelo V, Acero J, Fuentes-Zambrano J, García Guevara H, Olate S. : Artificial intelligence used for diagnosis in facial deformities: a systematic review. J Pers Med. 2024, 14:647. 10.3390/jpm14060647
9. Akcam MO, Evirgen S, Uslu O, Memikoğlu UT. .: Dental anomalies in individuals with cleft lip and/or palate .Eur J Orthod. 2010, 32:207-13. 10.1093/ejo/cjp156
10. Huqh MZU, Abdullah JY, Wong LS, et al.: Clinical applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in children with cleft lip and palate: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022, 19:10860.10.3390/ijerph191710860
11. Dhillon H, Chaudhari PK, Dhingra K, et al.: Current applications of artificial intelligence in cleft care: a scoping review. Front Med. 2021, 8:676490. 10.3389/fmed.2021.676490
12. Grayson BH, Cutting CB: Presurgical nasoalveolar orthopedic molding in primary correction of the nose, lip, and palate of infants with bilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001, 38:193-8.10.1597/1545-1569_2001_038_0193_pnomip_2.0.co_2
13. Schiebl J, Bauer FX, Grill F, et al.: RapidNAM: algorithm for the semi-automated generation of patient-specific nasoalveolar molding devices for patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2020, 67:1263-1271. 10.1109/tbme.2019.2934907
14. Arslan C, Yucel NO, Kahya K, Akturk ES, Cakan DG: Artificial intelligence for tooth detection in cleft lip and palate patients. Diagnostics :2849. 10.3390/diagnostics14242849
15. Bergland O, Semb G, Abyholm FE: Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment. Cleft Palate J. 1986, 23:175-205.
16. Zhang X, Qin N, Zhou Z, Chen S: Machine learning in 3D auto-filling alveolar cleft of CT images to assess the influence of alveolar bone grafting on the development of maxilla. BMC Oral Health. 2023, 23:16.10.1186/s12903-023-02706-8
17. Miranda F, Choudhari V, Barone S, et al.: Interpretable artificial intelligence for classification of alveolar bone defect in patients with cleft lip and palate. Scientific Reports. 2023, 13:15861. 10.1038/s41598-023-11 of 1243125-7
18. Park JA, Moon JH, Lee JM, Cho SJ, Seo BM, Donatelli RE, and Lee SJ. : Does artificial intelligence predict orthognathic surgical outcomes better than conventional linear regression methods?. Angle Orthod. 2024,94:549-56. 10.2319/111423-756.1
19. Lin G, Kim PJ, Baek SH, Kim HG, Kim SW, Chung JH: Early prediction of the need for orthognathic surgery in patients with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate using machine learning and longitudinal lateral cephalometric analysis data. J Craniofac Surg. 2021, 32:616-20. 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006943
20. Kim, IH., Jeong, J., Kim, JS.: Predicting orthognathic surgery results as postoperative lateral cephalograms using graph neural networks and diffusion models. . Nat Commun . 2025, 16:2586. 10.1038/s41467-025-57669-x
21. Ezhov M, Gusarev M, Golitsyna M, et al.: Clinically applicable artificial intelligence system for dental diagnosis with CBCT. Sci Rep. 2021, 11:15006. 10.1038/s41598-021-94093-9
22. Kantar RS, Hamdan US, Muller JN, et al.: Global prevalence and burden of orofacial clefts: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2023,34:10.1097/SCS.0000000000009591
23. Nantha O, Sathanarugsawait B, Praneetpolgrang P. : Cleft lip and palate classification through vision transformers and Siamese neural networks. . journal of imaging . 2024,10:271.10.3390/jimaging10110271
24. Murphy I, Taylor N. : The accuracy and speed of artificial intelligent cephalometric software compared to computer and paper tracing in patients with cleft lip and palate.. British dental journal . 2025, 10.1038/s41415-025-8877-y.
25. Kuwada C, Ariji Y, Kise Y, : Detection and classification of unilateral cleft alveolus with and without cleft palate on panoramic radiographs using a deep learning system.. Scientific Report . 2021, 11:16044. 10.1038/s41598-021-95653-9
26. Mathad VC, Scherer N, Chapman K et.al: A Deep Learning Algorithm for Objective Assessment of Hypernasality in Children With Cleft Palate. . IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021, 68:2986-2996. 10.1109/TBME.2021.3058424