⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Beyond Neurocentrism: Toward an Embodied, Predictive and Integrative Framework for Consciousness


Authors : Mohammad Ebrahimi

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 10 - October


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3scbvn56

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26Oct224

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : The prevailing neurological orthodoxy equates the mind with neuronal activation. While empirically grounded, this reductionist paradigm fails to account for subjective experience, altered states of consciousness, and the profound influence of the body on cognition. This opinion challenges the neurocentric assumption and proposes a radical redefinition: The mind is an emergent, dynamic, predictive, and nonlinear process arising from the continuous integration of all intentional (cognitive) and non-intentional (affective, homeostatic, and interoceptive) psychological processes occurring throughout the living body, constantly reconciling internal bodily needs with external environmental demands. Drawing on predictive processing theory, embodied cognition, complex systems dynamics, and recent work on interoception and homeostatic feelings, it is argued that consciousness is not a binary neural switch but a nonlinear spectrum of bodilycognitive integration. This framework offers novel implications for psychiatry, medicine, artificial intelligence, and clinical diagnostics.

Keywords : Consciousness, Neurocentrism, Embodied Cognition, Predictive Processing, Interoception, Integration, Nonlinearity.

References :

  1. Chalmers DJ. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 2(3), 200–219.
  2. Cariani P, Baker JM. (2022).  Time Is of the Essence: Neural Codes, Synchronies, Oscillations, Architectures. Front Comput Neurosci. 169898829),1-36.
  3. Ebrahimi M. (2025). Beyond the Brain: Decoding Cellular Memory through the Quantum. Homunculus. IJISRT. 10, (6),1-7.
  4. Foglia L, Wilson RA. (2013). Embodied cognition. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci, 4(3), 319-325.
  5. Ebrahimi M, Ivanovna Nesterova V. (2024). Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Quantum-Entropy theory in Psychology and Medicine, Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, 1-10.
  6. Damasio A, & Damasio H. (2024). Homeostatic Feelings and the Emergence of Consciousness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 36(8), 1653-1659.
  7. Klin A, Jones W, Schultz R, Volkmar F. (2003). The enactive mind, or from actions to cognition: lessons from autism. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 28,358(1430), 345-60.
  8. Friston K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 11(2), 127–138.
  9. Clark A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204.
  10. Eva D, Felix S, Adam S, Abhinandan J, Arturo T, et al. (2025). Feeling the Heat: A Thermodynamic Perspective on Emotions, Motivation, and Time Perception. New Ideas in Psychology. 2025, (79),1-7.
  11. Ebrahimi M. (2025). Homunculus Models in Neuroscience, Immunology, and Quantum Biology: Insights into Cellular Signaling and Communication. IJISRT, 10, (2),1-9.
  12. Ebrahimi M. (2025). The Quantum Homunculus in Biology: How DNA and Biomolecules Bridge the Classical and Quantum Realms, IJISRT. 10, (4),1-5.
  13. Miller MD. (2018). Entangled predictive brain: Emotion, prediction and embodied cognition [Doctoral thesis]. University of Edinburgh.
  14. Petzschner FH, Garfinkel SN, Paulus MP, Koch C, Khalsa SS. (2021). Computational Models of Interoception and Body Regulation, Trends Neurosci. 44(1), 63-76.
  15. Singer J, Damasio A. (2025). The physiology of interoception and its adaptive role in consciousness, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 13,380(1939), 20240305.
  16. Ainley V, Maister L, Brokfeld J, Farmer H, Tsakiris M. (2013). More of myself: manipulating interoceptive awareness by heightened attention to bodily and narrative aspects of the self, Conscious Cogn. 22(4), 1231-8.
  1. Engel AK, Fries P. (2016). Neuronal oscillations, coherence, and consciousness. In The Neurology of Consciousness, chapter 3, (2nd ed., pp. 49–60). Elsevier.
  2. Venter E. (2021). Toward an embodied, embedded predictive processing account. 29,12(543076), 1-11.
  3. Clark A. (2016). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind, Oxford University Press.
  4. Kiverstein J, Kirchhoff MD, & Thacker M. (2022) An embodied predictive processing theory of pain experience, Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 13(4), 973–998.
  5. Kelso JAS. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior, MIT Press.
  6. Kelso JAS, & Engstrøm DA. (2006). The complementary nature. MIT Press.
  7. Carhart-Harris RL, Leech R, Hellyer PJ, Shanahan M, Feilding A, Tagliazucchi E, & Nutt D. (2014). The entropic brain: A theory of conscious states informed by neuroimaging research with psychedelic drugs, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8, 20, 1-22.
  8. Beggs JM, & Plenz D. (2003). Neuronal avalanches in neocortical circuits. Journal of Neuroscience. 23(35), 11167–11177.
  9. Seth AK. (2013). Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 17(11), 565–573.
  10. Allen M, & Friston K J. (2018). From cognitivism to autopoiesis: Towards a computational framework for the embodied mind. Synthese, 195(6), 2459–2482.
  11. Tognoli E, & Kelso JAS. (2014). The metastable brain. Neuron. 81(1), 35–48.
  12. Hartshorn S, O’Brien. (2026). Domain Loop Model: Grounding consciousness science in whole-body homeostatic computation. (2026). Zenodo.  Version 1.0,1-47.
  13. Edwards R R, Dworkin R H., Sullivan M D, Turk D C, & Wasan A D. (2016). The role of psychosocial processes in the development and maintenance of chronic pain, The Journal of Pain, 17(9), T70–T92.
  14. Van den Bergh O, Witthöft M Petersen S, & Brown RJ. (2017). Symptoms and the body: Taking the inferential leap. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 74, 185–203.
  15. Lane R D. (2014). Is it possible to bridge the Biopsychosocial and Biomedical models? Biopsychosoc Med. 14,8(1), 1-3.
  16. Gazzaniga M S. (2018). The consciousness instinct: Unraveling the mystery of how the brain makes the mind. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 101728992.
  17. Wangxiao B, and Yining Z. (2026). Mini-Review: Vagus Nerve Stimulation and ThalamicConnectivity in Disorders of Consciousness. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 2026, 3600621, 1-9.
  18. Yaxiu T, Qu S, Xinchun W, Fanshuo Z. (2025). Discriminative power of diverse nonlinear EEG dynamics across consciousness states during auditory stimulation in disorders of consciousness. Front Hum Neurosci, 12, 19:1-12.
  19. Atta-ur-Rahman. (2024). Protein Folding and Molecular Basis of Memory: Molecular Vibrations and Quantum Entanglement as Basis of Consciousness. Current Medicinal Chemistry.31,3,258-269.

The prevailing neurological orthodoxy equates the mind with neuronal activation. While empirically grounded, this reductionist paradigm fails to account for subjective experience, altered states of consciousness, and the profound influence of the body on cognition. This opinion challenges the neurocentric assumption and proposes a radical redefinition: The mind is an emergent, dynamic, predictive, and nonlinear process arising from the continuous integration of all intentional (cognitive) and non-intentional (affective, homeostatic, and interoceptive) psychological processes occurring throughout the living body, constantly reconciling internal bodily needs with external environmental demands. Drawing on predictive processing theory, embodied cognition, complex systems dynamics, and recent work on interoception and homeostatic feelings, it is argued that consciousness is not a binary neural switch but a nonlinear spectrum of bodilycognitive integration. This framework offers novel implications for psychiatry, medicine, artificial intelligence, and clinical diagnostics.

Keywords : Consciousness, Neurocentrism, Embodied Cognition, Predictive Processing, Interoception, Integration, Nonlinearity.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - October - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe