Authors : Neha Barari; Dr. David Ratna Paul

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 3 - March

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/27r7ybmk

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bdswk69x

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar1536

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.

Abstract : Family planning is a critical component of reproductive health that empowers individuals and couples to make informed choices about their reproductive lives. Despite the availability of various methods, numerous barriers hinder the effective utilization of family planning services. This abstract explores key obstacles, including socio-cultural, economic, and educational factors that influence access and acceptance of family planning methods. Socio-cultural barriers often stem from traditional beliefs and societal norms that may promote large families or stigmatize contraceptive use. Economic constraints, such as the cost of contraceptives and healthcare services, can limit access, particularly in low-income populations. Additionally, a lack of comprehensive sexual education contributes to misinformation and fear surrounding family planning methods. This holistic understanding of barriers is essential for developing targeted interventions that promote informed family planning choices and improve reproductive health outcomes globally. By addressing these challenges, stakeholders can enhance accessibility, acceptance, and overall effectiveness of family planning initiatives.

Keywords : Contraceptives, Obstacles, Challenges.

References :

1. World Health Organization. Family planning/contraception methods [Internet]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception. Accessed March 17, 2025.
2. Butler AS, Clayton EW. Overview of family planning in the United States. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2018.
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Access to contraception [Internet]. Available from: https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2015/01/access-to-contraception. Accessed March 17, 2025.
4. Bish JJ, M.S. What is overpopulation? Causes, effects, and solutions [Internet]. Population Media Center; 2024. Available from: https://www.populationmedia.org/the-latest/overpopulation-cause-and-effect. Accessed March 17, 2025.
5. TNN. India has just 2.4% of world’s land but 18% of its population [Internet]. Times Of India; 2019. Available from: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nagpur/india-has-just-2-4-of-worlds-land-but-18-of-its-population/articleshow/69848388.cms. Accessed March 17, 2025.
6. Tessema GA, et al. Interpregnancy intervals and adverse birth outcomes in high-income countries: An international cohort study. PLoS One. 2021;16(7):e0255000. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255000
7. Latt SM, Milner A, Kavanagh A. Abortion laws reform may reduce maternal mortality: An ecological study in 162 countries. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19(1):1. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0705-y
8. Birth control. Mayo Clinic. Available from: https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/birth-control/in-depth/birth-control-options/art-20045571. Accessed March 17, 2025.
9. Family planning. United Nations Population Fund. Available from: https://www.unfpa.org/family-planning. Accessed March 17, 2025.
10. Key K, et al. Challenges accessing contraceptive care and interest in over-the-counter oral contraceptive pill use among Black, Indigenous, and people of color: An online cross-sectional survey. Contraception. 2023;120:109950. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2023.109950
11. Solo J, Festin M. Provider bias in family planning services: A review of its meaning and manifestations. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019;7(3):371-85. Available from: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00130
12. Coulson J, Sharma V, Wen H. Understanding the global dynamics of continuing unmet need for family planning and unintended pregnancy. China Popul Dev Stud. 2023;7(1):1-14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42379-023-00130-7
13. Barari N, Sethi D. A narrative review on knowledge and practice regarding family planning methods and knowledge and effectiveness of Six Sigma in the health sector. J Datta Meghe Inst Med Sci Univ. 2023;18(4):804-14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_487_22
14. Sen S, Cetinkaya A, Cavuslar A. Perception scale of barriers to contraceptive use: A methodological study. Fertil Res Pract. 2017;3(1):11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-017-0038-9
15. Subba M, Devi DB, Devi R. Knowledge, practice, and barriers in utilization of family planning methods among married couples of urban and rural areas of Sikkim. Int J Adv Res Community Health Nurs. 2022;4(1):19-28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33545/26641658.2022.v4.i1a.94
16. Bapolisi WA, Bisimwa G, Merten S. Barriers to family planning use in the Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo: An application of the theory of planned behaviour using a longitudinal survey. BMJ Open. 2023;13(2):e061564. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061564
17. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health - articles list. Mums.ac.ir. Available from: https://jmrh.mums.ac.ir/?_action=article&au=153491&_au=Lumchio+Levis+Murry. Accessed March 17, 2025.
18. Kirigia C, Gitonga L, Muraya MM. Barriers to immediate post-partum intra-uterine contraceptive device uptake among mothers delivering at Meru hospital. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;9(03):312-25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2019.93032
19. Thakur S, et al. A comparative study on knowledge, awareness and perception of contraception among rural and urban population in Punjab. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2024;11(2):191-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijogr.2024.039
20. Sowmya, Ansuya, Vinish V. Contraceptives utilization and barriers in Karnataka, Southern India: A survey on women residing in slums. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020;8(4):1077-81. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2020.03.023
21. Goel P, Nebhinani M, Rani R. Knowledge and barriers towards use of family planning methods among women: A study from Western India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2020;7(11):4385. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20204734
22. Ochako R, et al. Barriers to modern contraceptive methods uptake among young women in Kenya: A qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2017;15(1):118. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1483-1
23. Das MK, et al. Perception of HIV/AIDS: A comparative study among urban and rural adult males. Medico Res Chronicles. 2018;2(3):333-41. Available from: https://medrech.com/index.php/medrech/article/view/91. Accessed March 17, 2025.
24. Shah AM, Lee K, Nisa Mir J. Exploring readiness for birth control in improving women health status: Factors influencing the adoption of modern contraceptives methods for family planning practices. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(22):11892. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211892
25. Nanvubya A, et al. Barriers and facilitators of family planning use in fishing communities of Lake Victoria in Uganda. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020;11:2150132720943775. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2150132720943775
26. Mushy SE, et al. Barriers to the uptake of modern family planning methods among female youth of Temeke District in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: A qualitative study. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2020;24:100499. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100499
27. Jisso M, et al. Barriers to family planning service utilization in Ethiopia: A qualitative study. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2023;33(Spec Iss 2):143-54. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v33i2.8S
28. Sigdel A, et al. Barriers in accessing family planning services in Nepal during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2023;18(5):e0285248. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285248
29. Vidhyalakshmi RK, et al. Obstacles and challenges in gaining access to family planning services in COVID era: A cross-sectional descriptive study. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2023;14(4):242-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37506/ijphrd.v14i4.19800
30. Ngole BE, Joho AA. Factors influencing modern family planning utilization and barriers in women of reproductive age in the Iringa Region, Tanzania: A mixed-methods study. SAGE Open Nurs. 2025;11:23779608251313897. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251313897
31. Akinyemi OO, Harris B, Kawonga M. ‘Our culture prohibits some things’: Qualitative inquiry into how sociocultural context influences the scale-up of community-based injectable contraceptives in Nigeria. BMJ Open. 2020;10(7):e035311. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035311
32. Upadhye JJ, Upadhye JV. Contraceptive awareness and practices in women of urban India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(4):1279. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20171076
33. Bhatt N, et al. Perceptions of family planning services and its key barriers among adolescents and young people in Eastern Nepal: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0252184. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252184
34. Abdulai AM, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of contraceptives among adolescents and young adults in Ghana. The Evidence. 2024;2(2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.61505/evidence.2024.2.2.29
35. Family planning improves the economic well-being of families and communities. PRB. Available from: https://www.prb.org/resources/family-planning-improves-the-economic-well-being-of-families-and-communities/. Accessed March 17, 2025.
36. Gueye A, et al. Belief in family planning myths at the individual and community levels and modern contraceptive use in urban Africa. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015;41(4):191-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1363/4119115
37. Hellwig F, et al. Policies for expanding family planning coverage: Lessons from five successful countries. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1339725. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1339725