⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



BackupIntegrity: AI-Enabled Protection and Recovery of Healthcare Database Backups in Cloud Environments


Authors : Answer Mushedhe; Onuh Matthew Ijiga

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 10 - October


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/muxdmepu

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26Oct623

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : The increasing migration of healthcare information systems to cloud computing environments has intensified concerns regarding database backup integrity, ransomware attacks, unauthorized data modification, backup corruption, and operational disruptions affecting the availability and recoverability of sensitive patient records. Conventional backup protection mechanisms, including checksum-based validation, scheduled backup verification, rule-based intrusion detection, and static disaster recovery procedures, provide essential safeguards but may fail to recognize sophisticated integrity attacks, identify compromised recovery points, or optimize restoration under rapidly changing threat conditions. This paper proposes BackupIntegrity, a novel artificial intelligence-enabled framework integrating adaptive anomaly detection, cryptographic integrity verification, predictive backup reliability assessment, and risk-aware automated recovery for healthcare databases hosted in cloud environments. The proposed framework introduces the Backup Integrity-Aware Adaptive Recovery Algorithm (BIARA), which combines a Temporal Transformer Network (TTN), an Isolation Forest (IF), a Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and a Multi-Objective Recovery Optimization (MORO) mechanism within a unified protection and restoration architecture. The Temporal Transformer captures long-range dependencies in backup activity sequences, while the Isolation Forest identifies abnormal backup access, modification, and encryption patterns. The GRU estimates backup failure probabilities and degradation trends, whereas the optimization component selects verified recovery points by jointly minimizing recovery time, potential data loss, residual compromise risk, and operational recovery costs. Cryptographic SHA-256 verification, authenticated backup manifests, immutable storage policies, and recovery-point dependency analysis provide additional safeguards against backup manipulation and contaminated restoration. The proposed system will be evaluated using a controlled cloud-based healthcare database testbed incorporating representative electronic health record transactions, incremental and full backup operations, simulated ransomware incidents, unauthorized backup modifications, storage failures, and recovery scenarios. Its performance will be compared with conventional checksum-based backup verification, rule-based security monitoring, standalone Isolation Forest, Long ShortTerm Memory (LSTM), and XGBoost-based detection and recovery approaches. Experimental evaluation will examine detection accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), falsepositive rate, backup verification latency, recovery time objective (RTO), recovery point objective (RPO), data restoration success rate, and computational overhead. Comparative performance graphs, ROC curves, recovery-time distributions, reliability trajectories, and multi-objective optimization plots will be used to determine whether BIARA provides statistically significant improvements over the benchmark approaches. The anticipated contribution is a reproducible, integrity-aware cloud recovery architecture capable of strengthening ransomware resilience, identifying trustworthy restoration points, reducing recovery uncertainty, and supporting the continuity, confidentiality, and availability of critical healthcare information systems.

Keywords : Artificial Intelligence; Healthcare Databases; Backup Integrity; Cloud Security; Disaster Recovery.

References :

  1. Agyekum, B., Duodu, D. S.-., & Gloria, A. (2025). Federated Industrial IoT Threats Detection. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology, 4(12), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijsrmt.v4i12.1552
  2. Akanni, F., Idowu, K., Odozor, L., & Waheed, B. (2026). Cyber-financial risk analytics: Integrating business intelligence with threat modeling. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 12(2), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT26121371
  3. Ali, O., Shrestha, A., Soar, J., & Wamba, S. F. (2018). Cloud computing-enabled healthcare opportunities, issues, and applications: A systematic review. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.009
  4. Al-rimy, B. A. S., Maarof, M. A., & Shaid, S. Z. M. (2018). Ransomware threat success factors, taxonomy, and countermeasures: A survey and research directions. Computers & Security, 74, 144–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2018.01.001
  5. Ashieyi-Ahorgah, R. (2025). Blended finance structures for scaling clean energy in emerging markets: Implications for U.S. development strategy. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 8(9), 1741–1751.
  6. Ashieyi-Ahorgah, R. (2025). Crowdfunding the American future: How equity and donation-based models can drive innovation, inclusion, and job creation. World Journal of Innovation and Modern Technology, 9(11), 119–153. https://doi.org/10.56201/wjimt.v9.no11.2025.pg119.153
  7. Ashieyi-Ahorgah, R. (2025a). Blended finance as a strategic tool for U.S.–Africa renewable energy partnerships: Catalyzing climate diplomacy and security through investment innovation. Research Journal in Business and Economics, 3(2), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.61424/rjbe.v3i2.500
  8. Ashieyi-Ahorgah, R. (2025b). Energy infrastructure as a catalyst for mineral-based industrialization in Africa: A U.S. investment perspective. International Journal of Scientific Research & Engineering Trends, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17212450
  9. Ashieyi-Ahorgah, R., & Duodu, R. O. (2024). Mobilizing private capital through blended finance mechanisms to accelerate U.S. startup growth in strategic sectors: A framework for economic competitiveness and national security. International Journal for Novel Research in Economics, Finance and Management, 2(3), 1–13.
  10. Beaman, C., Barkworth, A., Akande, T. D., Hakak, S., & Khan, M. K. (2021). Ransomware: Recent advances, analysis, challenges and future research directions. Computers & Security, 111, Article 102490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102490
  11. Begovic, K., Al-Ali, A., & Malluhi, Q. (2023). Cryptographic ransomware encryption detection: Survey. Computers & Security, 132, Article 103349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2023.103349
  12. Berardi, D., Giallorenzo, S., Melis, A., Melloni, S., Onori, L., & Prandini, M. (2023). Data flooding against ransomware: Concepts and implementations. Computers & Security, 131, Article 103295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2023.103295
  13. Cen, M., Jiang, F., Qin, X., Jiang, Q., & Doss, R. (2024). Ransomware early detection: A survey. Computer Networks, 239, Article 110138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2023.110138
  14. Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541880.1541882
  15. Cho, K., van Merriënboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder–decoder for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 1724–1734). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1179
  16. cstonesolutions., (n.d).  Server vs. Cloud Backup: What’s Best for Your Medical Practice? https://cstonesolutions.net/it-data-backup-monitoring/
  17. Dai, Z., Por, L. Y., Chen, Y.-L., Yang, J., Ku, C. S., Alizadehsani, R., & Pławiak, P. (2024). An intrusion detection model to detect zero-day attacks in unseen data using machine learning. PLOS ONE, 19(9), Article e0308469. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308469
  18. Folorunso, T. N., Idowu, K., & Balogun, A. (2025). AI-driven financial risk forecasting: A multi-model ensemble approach for enterprise decision intelligence. Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications, 34(3), 147–173. https://eudoxuspress.com/index.php/pub/article/view/5080
  19. Frank, U. P. (2026a). Healthcare quality metrics: From data collection to performance improvement; A narrative review of measurement frameworks and improvement methods in United States health care. UKR Journal of Medicine and Medical Research. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22105362
  20. Frank, U. P. (2026b). Optimizing medical inventory management through predictive analytics: Implications for healthcare quality, cost reduction, and patient safety; A narrative review. UKR Journal of Education and Literature, 2(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22105843
  21. Frank, U. P. (2026c). Artificial intelligence for infection surveillance: Improving early detection of healthcare-associated infections. USR Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Studies.
  22. Garg, N., Bawa, S., & Kumar, N. (2020). An efficient data integrity auditing protocol for cloud computing. Future Generation Computer Systems, 109, 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.03.032
  23. Han, H., Fei, S., Yan, Z., & Zhou, X. (2022). A survey on blockchain-based integrity auditing for cloud data. Digital Communications and Networks, 8(5), 591–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2022.04.036
  24. Idowu, K., Cherotich, V., Aniebonam, E. E., Odozor, L., & During, A. (2025). Integrating AI and machine learning into cyber risk management for critical utility systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Engineering and Technology, 6(2), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJAIET.2025.6.2.32-48
  25. Idowu, K., Leslie, A., Twayana, S., Nitzan, Y., & Waheed, B. O. (2026). Real-time detection of DDoS and phishing attacks for enhanced banking security. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 13(1), 572–593. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET2613313
  26. Ijiga, O. M., Ifenatuora, G. P., & Olateju, M. (2021). Bridging STEM and cross-cultural education: Designing inclusive pedagogies for multilingual classrooms in Sub-Saharan Africa. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 5(1). Publisher article
  27. Ijiga, O. M., Ifenatuora, G. P., & Olateju, M. (2021). Digital storytelling as a tool for enhancing STEM engagement: A multimedia approach to science communication in K–12 education. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 2(5), 495–505. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2021.2.5.495-505
  28. Ismayilov, G., & Topcuoglu, H. R. (2020). Neural network based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for dynamic workflow scheduling in cloud computing. Future Generation Computer Systems, 102, 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.08.012
  29. Jin, H., Zhou, K., Jiang, H., Lei, D., Wei, R., & Li, C. (2018). Full integrity and freshness for cloud data. Future Generation Computer Systems, 80, 640–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.06.013
  30. Johnson, A. E. W., Bulgarelli, L., Shen, L., Gayles, A., Shammout, A., Horng, S., Pollard, T. J., Hao, S., Moody, B., Gow, B., Lehman, L.-w. H., Celi, L. A., & Mark, R. G. (2023). MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset. Scientific Data, 10, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01899-x
  31. Lim, B., Arık, S. Ö., Loeff, N., & Pfister, T. (2021). Temporal fusion transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 37(4), 1748–1764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.03.012
  32. Liu, F. T., Ting, K. M., & Zhou, Z.-H. (2008). Isolation forest. In 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (pp. 413–422). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2008.17
  33. Liu, F. T., Ting, K. M., & Zhou, Z.-H. (2012). Isolation-based anomaly detection. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 6(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133360.2133363
  34. Masdari, M., ValiKardan, S., Shahi, Z., & Azar, S. I. (2016). Towards workflow scheduling in cloud computing: A comprehensive analysis. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 66, 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.01.018
  35. Negro-Calduch, E., Azzopardi-Muscat, N., Krishnamurthy, R. S., & Novillo-Ortiz, D. (2021). Technological progress in electronic health record system optimization: Systematic review of systematic literature reviews. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 152, Article 104507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104507
  36. Neprash, H. T., McGlave, C. C., Cross, D. A., Virnig, B. A., Puskarich, M. A., Huling, J. D., Rozenshtein, A. Z., & Nikpay, S. S. (2022). Trends in ransomware attacks on US hospitals, clinics, and other health care delivery organizations, 2016–2021. JAMA Health Forum, 3(12), Article e224873. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.4873
  37. Odozor, L., Berko, S. N., Obu, A. U., & Idowu, K. (2025). Building a resilient U.S. cybersecurity workforce through practical training. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 8(8), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2025.8804
  38. Oh, S.-R., Seo, Y.-D., Lee, E., & Kim, Y.-G. (2021). A comprehensive survey on security and privacy for electronic health data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18), Article 9668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189668
  39. Onyekaonwu, C. B., & Peter-Anyebe, A. C. (2019). Empowering underserved youth through tech-enabled STEM education: A participatory model from Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST1965990
  40. Onyekaonwu, C. B., Peter-Anyebe, A. C., & Raphael, F. O. (2019). From prescription to prediction: Leveraging AI/ML to improve medication adherence and adverse drug event detection in community pharmacies. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 6(6), 460–476. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST52310387
  41. Pang, G., Shen, C., Cao, L., & van den Hengel, A. (2022). Deep learning for anomaly detection: A review. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(2), Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3439950
  42. Patel, A., Taghavi, M., Bakhtiyari, K., & Celestino Júnior, J. (2013). An intrusion detection and prevention system in cloud computing: A systematic review. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 36(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2012.08.007
  43. Pool, J., Akhlaghpour, S., Fatehi, F., & Burton-Jones, A. (2024). A systematic analysis of failures in protecting personal health data: A scoping review. International Journal of Information Management, 74, Article 102719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102719
  44. Salinas, D., Flunkert, V., Gasthaus, J., & Januschowski, T. (2020). DeepAR: Probabilistic forecasting with autoregressive recurrent networks. International Journal of Forecasting, 36(3), 1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.07.001
  45. Singh, S., Jeong, Y.-S., & Park, J. H. (2016). A survey on cloud computing security: Issues, threats, and solutions. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 75, 200–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.09.002
  46. Zafar, F., Khan, A., Malik, S. U. R., Ahmed, M., Anjum, A., Khan, M. I., Javed, N., Alam, M., & Jamil, F. (2017). A survey of cloud computing data integrity schemes: Design challenges, taxonomy and future trends. Computers & Security, 65, 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2016.10.006
  47. Zamanzadeh Darban, Z., Webb, G. I., Pan, S., Aggarwal, C. C., & Salehi, M. (2024). Deep learning for time series anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 57(1), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3691338

The increasing migration of healthcare information systems to cloud computing environments has intensified concerns regarding database backup integrity, ransomware attacks, unauthorized data modification, backup corruption, and operational disruptions affecting the availability and recoverability of sensitive patient records. Conventional backup protection mechanisms, including checksum-based validation, scheduled backup verification, rule-based intrusion detection, and static disaster recovery procedures, provide essential safeguards but may fail to recognize sophisticated integrity attacks, identify compromised recovery points, or optimize restoration under rapidly changing threat conditions. This paper proposes BackupIntegrity, a novel artificial intelligence-enabled framework integrating adaptive anomaly detection, cryptographic integrity verification, predictive backup reliability assessment, and risk-aware automated recovery for healthcare databases hosted in cloud environments. The proposed framework introduces the Backup Integrity-Aware Adaptive Recovery Algorithm (BIARA), which combines a Temporal Transformer Network (TTN), an Isolation Forest (IF), a Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and a Multi-Objective Recovery Optimization (MORO) mechanism within a unified protection and restoration architecture. The Temporal Transformer captures long-range dependencies in backup activity sequences, while the Isolation Forest identifies abnormal backup access, modification, and encryption patterns. The GRU estimates backup failure probabilities and degradation trends, whereas the optimization component selects verified recovery points by jointly minimizing recovery time, potential data loss, residual compromise risk, and operational recovery costs. Cryptographic SHA-256 verification, authenticated backup manifests, immutable storage policies, and recovery-point dependency analysis provide additional safeguards against backup manipulation and contaminated restoration. The proposed system will be evaluated using a controlled cloud-based healthcare database testbed incorporating representative electronic health record transactions, incremental and full backup operations, simulated ransomware incidents, unauthorized backup modifications, storage failures, and recovery scenarios. Its performance will be compared with conventional checksum-based backup verification, rule-based security monitoring, standalone Isolation Forest, Long ShortTerm Memory (LSTM), and XGBoost-based detection and recovery approaches. Experimental evaluation will examine detection accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), falsepositive rate, backup verification latency, recovery time objective (RTO), recovery point objective (RPO), data restoration success rate, and computational overhead. Comparative performance graphs, ROC curves, recovery-time distributions, reliability trajectories, and multi-objective optimization plots will be used to determine whether BIARA provides statistically significant improvements over the benchmark approaches. The anticipated contribution is a reproducible, integrity-aware cloud recovery architecture capable of strengthening ransomware resilience, identifying trustworthy restoration points, reducing recovery uncertainty, and supporting the continuity, confidentiality, and availability of critical healthcare information systems.

Keywords : Artificial Intelligence; Healthcare Databases; Backup Integrity; Cloud Security; Disaster Recovery.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - October - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe